OGA-032 Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

This scenario involvesmigration planningfor ArchiCar as it transitions from aproduct-centric approachto anoperational excellence strategyfor mass-producing affordable cars in emerging markets. The task is to model the steps involved, includingwork packages,deliverables, and themotivationsdriving the transitions.

Key ArchiMate® 3.2 Concepts Applied:

Capabilities and Transition Phases:

The existing capabilities—R&D, material sourcing, and engineering—need to be adjusted to fit the new strategy. In particular:

Revising R&D targetsto align with the goal of affordable production.

Revising the procurement strategyto optimize material sourcing.

Introduction of aprocess focusin the second phase to shift from a product-centered approach to operational excellence.

Two transition states are identified:

Plateau 1 (Adjusted Capabilities):Focuses on revising theR&D strategyandprocurement strategy.

Plateau 2 (Shifted Focus):Involves shifting to a process-oriented focus, adjusting material sourcing, and implementing aprocess frameworkto enableend-to-end process thinking.

Work Packages and Deliverables:

Work packagesinclude activities such asrevising R&D strategyandprocurement strategyduring the first transition, and thendeveloping process focusandimplementing a process frameworkin the second transition.

These work packages are linked tokey deliverables:

Plateau 1: Realigning R&D and procurement strategies to achieve adjusted capabilities.

Plateau 2: Implementing a process framework, shifting to process-orientedthinking, and achieving the operational excellence goals.

Motivation Elements:

The migration is driven by a need torealign current capabilities(such as focusing R&D on affordability and optimizing procurement) and a requirement toshift focusfrom product leadership to operational excellence.

The external driver is the competition and market opportunity in emerging markets, where cost is more critical than luxury.

Dependencies and Constraints:

Supplier contracts may impose constraints on how quickly procurement strategies can change, which is considered in the transition planning.

Theprocess frameworkmust be implemented in a way that supportsend-to-end process thinking.

Why Option B is Correct:

Option Baccurately reflects the two transition phases (Plateaus 1 and 2) and shows the appropriate work packages and deliverables in line with the scenario.

It clearly models the steps forrevising R&D strategyandprocurement strategyin the first transition, and the shift to aprocess focusin the second transition.

Theprocess frameworkand its link toend-to-end process thinkingand procurement strategy are also correctly modeled, fulfilling the requirements of the scenario.

Motivationsfor the changes, such as thefocus on the price/quality ratio, and the external drivers for shifting strategy are well captured.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option AandOption Cmisrepresent or omit important relationships between work packages, such as the link between theprocess frameworkand theend-to-end process thinking.

Option Ddoes not correctly capture the sequence of work packages and the logical flow of transitions between phases.

Conclusion:

Option Bprovides the most complete and accurate description of the scenario, correctly illustrating themigration planning,motivations, and thework packagesnecessary to achieve the target state. It aligns well with ArchiMate® 3.2 modeling standards and meets the scenario's requirements.

In this scenario, the goal is to model thebusiness processes, theirsub-processes, theapplicationssupporting these processes, and thedata objectsthese applications access. Additionally, external services that access some of these data objects need to be shown. This includes capturing the key processes and their dependencies, as well as understanding how the applications interact with data and external services.

Key ArchiMate® 3.2 Concepts Applied:

Business Processes and Sub-Processes:

Transaction Capture Process: Consists of two sub-processes:

Manual Exchange

Loans & Distribution (L&D)This process is responsible for capturing transactions from users through different applications (Online Account Management, L&D Application).

Pricing Process: This process uses theMutual Fund Pricesfrom a third-party service and thePlan Balancesto validate and price trades.

Trading Process: This process generates aTrade Fileand interacts with an externalTrading Service.

Reconciliation Process: This final process updates thePlan Recordkeeping Dataafter confirming trades from theExternal Trading Service.

Applications and Data:

Online Account Management ApplicationandL&D Application: These capture user inputs for transactions and maintainTransaction DataandPlan Balances.

Pricing Application: UsesMutual Fund PricesandTransaction Datato generateTrade Data.

Trading Application: SubmitsTrade Dataand receives aConfirmation Filefromthe externalTrading Service.

Reconciliation Application: Uses theConfirmation Fileto updatePlan Recordkeeping Data.

External Application Services:

Third-Party Information Service: ProvidesMutual Fund Prices.

External Trading Service: Processes trades and returns aConfirmation File.

Data Objects:

Transaction Data: Captured by the transaction capture processes.

Mutual Fund Prices: Received from the third-party service.

Trade Data: Generated by the pricing and trading applications.

Plan Recordkeeping Data: Updated by the reconciliation process after trade confirmation.

Why Option B is Correct:

Option Bprovides the most complete and accurate representation of the scenario. It captures thebusiness processes(Transaction Capture, Pricing, Trading, Reconciliation) and their sub-processes, while showing the appropriate connections to theapplicationsthat support these processes.

It clearly depicts thedata objects(Transaction Data, Plan Balances, Trade File, Mutual Fund Prices, Plan Recordkeeping Data) and their flows between the processes and applications.

The model also includes theexternal services(Third-Party Information Service and External Trading Service), showing how these interact with the internal applications and data objects.

It accurately represents the flow ofTrade Datafrom thePricing Applicationto theTrading Application, and the use ofMutual Fund Pricesby thePricing Process.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option AandOption Dmiss some critical connections between the applications and the external services. They also lack clarity in how the data flows between the processes and applications.

Option Cdoes not adequately represent the interaction between the applications and the external services (e.g., Third-Party Information Service), which is a key requirement in this scenario.

Conclusion:

Option Bprovides the best and most accurate description of the business processes, applications, data objects, and external services involved in ArchiSurance's daily fund trading operations, following ArchiMate® 3.2 standards for modeling business processes and applications.