H12-891_V1.0 Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

Before performing a network cutover (migration or upgrade), it is essential to collect baseline data to ensure that services operate normally before and after the change.

Importance of Pre-Cutover Information Collection:

Identifies Network Baseline – Helps compare pre-cutover and post-cutover performance.

Detects Hidden Issues – Ensures that no existing network issues interfere with the cutover process.

Prevents Service Interruptions – Ensures all dependent services are accounted for.

Provides Rollback Plan – If issues arise, administrators can restore previous configurations.

Reference from Huawei HCIE-Datacom Documentation:

Huawei Network Change Management Guide – Pre-Cutover & Post-Cutover Best Practices

HCIE-Datacom Training Material – Service Assurance & Risk Analysis

To determine R3’s role (Level-1, Level-2, or Level-1-2) based on the provided output of the display ipv6 routing-table protocol isis command on R3, we need to analyze the IS-IS routing information and understand IS-IS hierarchy and behavior, particularly in the context of IPv6 routing. Let’s break it down step by step:

Understanding the IS-IS Levels and Hierarchy:

IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) is a link-state routing protocol that supports a two-level hierarchy:

Level-1: Routers within the same area, responsible for intra-area routing. Level-1 routers only maintain routing information for their area and rely on Level-1-2 routers to reach other areas.

Level-2: Routers that form the backbone, connecting different areas for inter-area routing. Level-2 routers maintain routing information across areas.

Level-1-2: Routers that operate both at Level-1 (within their area) and Level-2 (to connect to other areas). These routers act as boundary routers between Level-1 areas and the Level-2 backbone.

A router’s role (Level-1, Level-2, or Level-1-2) determines which types of adjacencies it can form and what routing information it advertises or receives.

Analyzing the Output:

The output shows R3’s IPv6 routing table with routes learned via IS-IS, specifically:

Destination: 2082:EDFC:DDCC::B824:0/127, Protocol: ISIS-L1

This route is learned via IS-IS Level-1 (ISIS-L1), indicating that R3 has a Level-1 adjacency and is receiving or advertising routes within its area.

The next hop (FE80::2E0:FCFF:FE45:6A3E) and interface (GigabitEthernet0/0/0) suggest this route is intra-area.

Destination: 2082:EDFC:DDCC::B891:0/127, Protocol: ISIS-L2

This route is learned via IS-IS Level-2 (ISIS-L2), indicating that R3 has a Level-2 adjacency and is receiving or advertising routes for inter-area or backbone routing.

The next hop (FE80::2E0:FCFF:FE50:406F) and interface (GigabitEthernet0/0/1) suggest this route is for a different area or the backbone.

Both Level-1 and Level-2 routes are present in R3’s routing table, which provides critical insight into R3’s role.

Determining R3’s Role:

Level-1 Routers:

Level-1 routers only participate in Level-1 adjacencies and maintain routing information for their area. They do not have Level-2 routes or adjacencies unless connected to a Level-1-2 router. Since R3 has a Level-2 route (ISIS-L2), it cannot be exclusively a Level-1 router.

Level-2 Routers:

Level-2 routers focus on inter-area routing and typically do not maintain Level-1 routes unless they are also configured as Level-1-2. Since R3 has a Level-1 route (ISIS-L1), it cannot be exclusively a Level-2 router.

Level-1-2 Routers:

Level-1-2 routers operate both at Level-1 (for intra-area routing) and Level-2 (for inter-area routing). They can form adjacencies with both Level-1 and Level-2 neighbors and maintain both types of routes. The presence of both ISIS-L1 and ISIS-L2 routes in R3’s routing table indicates that R3 is participating in both Level-1 and Level-2 adjacencies, making it a Level-1-2 router.

Evaluating Each Option:

A. R3 must be a Level-2 device.

This is incorrect because R3 has ISIS-L1 routes, indicating it is also participating in Level-1 adjacencies, which Level-2-only devices do not do. Level-2 devices focus solely on inter-area routing and do not maintain Level-1 routes.

B. The device role of R3 cannot be determined.

This is incorrect because the presence of both ISIS-L1 and ISIS-L2 routes in the routing table clearly indicates R3’s role. The combination of Level-1 and Level-2 routes confirms R3 is a Level-1-2 router.

C. R3 must be a Level-1-2 device.

This is correct. The routing table shows both ISIS-L1 (Level-1) and ISIS-L2 (Level-2) routes, meaning R3 is operating as both a Level-1 and Level-2 router, which defines a Level-1-2 device.

D. R3 must be a Level-1 device.

This is incorrect because R3 has ISIS-L2 routes, indicating it is also participating in Level-2 adjacencies, which Level-1-only devices do not do. Level-1 devices only maintain intra-area routes and rely on Level-1-2 routers for inter-area reachability.

Additional Considerations:

The Flags: D in the output typically indicates a directly connected route or a route downloaded to the forwarding table, but it does not affect the determination of R3’s IS-IS level.

The preference (15) and cost (20) are standard for IS-IS routes and do not impact the level determination.

In Huawei’s IS-IS implementation, routers can be configured explicitly as Level-1, Level-2, or Level-1-2 using commands like isis level-1-2 under the IS-IS process. The presence of both Level-1 and Level-2 routes confirms R3’s configuration as Level-1-2.

Huawei HCIE-Datacom Context:

According to Huawei HCIE-Datacom documentation, IS-IS routers can operate at different levels, and the routing table’s protocol type (ISIS-L1 or ISIS-L2) indicates the level of adjacency. A router with both Level-1 and Level-2 routes is necessarily a Level-1-2 device, as it participates in both intra-area and inter-area routing.

The display ipv6 routing-table protocol isis command on Huawei devices shows routes learned via IS-IS, and the protocol type (L1 or L2) directly reflects the router’s role in the IS-IS hierarchy.

Conclusion:

Based on the presence of both ISIS-L1 and ISIS-L2 routes in R3’s IPv6 routing table, R3 must be a Level-1-2 device, as it is participating in both Level-1 (intra-area) and Level-2 (inter-area) adjacencies. Therefore, the correct answer is C.

References to Huawei HCIE-Datacom Documents:

Huawei HCIE-Datacom V1.0 Training Material, Chapter on IS-IS Configuration and Hierarchy.

Huawei NE Series Router Configuration Guide, IS-IS Section (Level-1, Level-2, and Level-1-2 Operations).

Huawei Technical Whitepaper on IS-IS Protocol, discussing IPv6 Routing and Level Determination.

Authentication Header (AH) in IPsec

The Authentication Header (AH) protocol is part of IPsec and provides authentication, integrity, and replay protection but does NOT provide encryption.

✅ B. AH provides data origin authentication.

Ensures that packets come from a trusted source using cryptographic signatures.

✅ C. AH provides anti-replay protection.

Uses sequence numbers to prevent attackers from replaying old packets.

✅ D. AH provides data integrity authentication.

Ensures data integrity by verifying that packets have not been tampered with during transmission.

❌ A. AH provides packet encryption – Incorrect!

AH does not encrypt packet contents. It only authenticates headers.

ESP (Encapsulating Security Payload) is used for encryption in IPsec.

Reference from Huawei HCIE-Datacom Documentation:

Huawei IPsec Configuration Guide – AH vs. ESP

HCIE-Datacom Training Material – IPsec Security Mechanisms

Understanding SRLB (Segment Routing Local Block)

???? What is SRLB?

SRLB (Segment Routing Local Block) is a range of local MPLS labels used by Segment Routing (SR-MPLS).

These labels are only relevant to the local router and are not advertised to other routers.

???? Key SR-MPLS Label Blocks:✅ SRGB (Segment Routing Global Block) – Globally significant labels shared among routers.✅ SRLB (Segment Routing Local Block) – Locally significant labels, not shared.

Why is the Answer TRUE?

✅ SRLB labels are only locally defined and are NOT distributed via IGP (OSPF or IS-IS).✅ They are used for local forwarding decisions within an SR-enabled router.✅ Only SRGB labels are advertised to ensure consistent global label assignment.

Real-World Application:

Traffic Engineering (TE): Uses SRLB for custom local path optimizations.

Segment Routing Networks: Ensures scalable MPLS forwarding without requiring full LDP signaling.

✅ Reference: Huawei HCIE-Datacom Guide – Segment Routing Label Blocks (SRGB & SRLB)

From the IS-IS error output, the key error is:

Mismatched Area Addr(L1): 13

This clearly indicates that the area addresses are different, which prevents the Level-1 adjacency from forming.

Why is Option D Correct?

IS-IS Level-1 routers must have the same area ID to form an adjacency.

Since the log shows a mismatched area address, the adjacency fails at Level-1.

If R3 and R4 were Level-2 routers, they could form an adjacency even with different area IDs.

Why Are the Other Options Incorrect?

❌ Option A: No authentication failure is reported.❌ Option B: No "Mismatched Level" errors appear, so their levels are compatible.❌ Option C: No "Bad Circuit Type" errors indicate mismatched circuit types.

Thus, the correct answer is D.

???? Reference: Huawei HCIE Datacom – IS-IS Neighbor Troubleshooting