New Year Sale - Special 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: 70dumps

 AD0-E556 Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

Questions: 50 questions

Last Update: Dec 14, 2024

Adobe Certification Exam AD0-E556 has been designed to measure your skills in handling the technical tasks mentioned in the certification syllabus

AD0-E556 Exam Last Week Results!

20

Customers Passed
Adobe AD0-E556

90%

Average Score In Real
Exam At Testing Centre

87%

Questions came word by
word from this dump

An Innovative Pathway to Ensure Success in AD0-E556

DumpsTool Practice Questions provide you with the ultimate pathway to achieve your targeted Adobe Exam AD0-E556 IT certification. The innovative questions with their interactive and to the point content make your learning of the syllabus far easier than you could ever imagine.

Intensive Individual support and Guidance for AD0-E556

DumpsTool Practice Questions are information-packed and prove to be the best supportive study material for all exam candidates. They have been designed especially keeping in view your actual exam requirements. Hence they prove to be the best individual support and guidance to ace exam in first go!

AD0-E556 Downloadable on All Devices and Systems

Adobe Adobe Marketo Engage AD0-E556 PDF file of Practice Questions is easily downloadable on all devices and systems. This you can continue your studies as per your convenience and preferred schedule. Where as testing engine can be downloaded and install to any windows based machine.

AD0-E556 Exam Success with Money Back Guarantee

DumpsTool Practice Questions ensure your exam success with 100% money back guarantee. There virtually no possibility of losing Adobe Adobe Marketo Engage AD0-E556 Exam, if you grasp the information contained in the questions.

24/7 Customer Support

DumpsTool professional guidance is always available to its worthy clients on all issues related to exam and DumpsTool products. Feel free to contact us at your own preferred time. Your queries will be responded with prompt response.

Adobe AD0-E556 Exam Materials with Affordable Price!

DumpsTool tires its level best to entertain its clients with the most affordable products. They are never a burden on your budget. The prices are far less than the vendor tutorials, online coaching and study material. With their lower price, the advantage of DumpsTool AD0-E556 Adobe Marketo Engage Architect Practice Questions is enormous and unmatched!

Adobe AD0-E556 Practice Exam FAQs

1. To what extent DumpsTool AD0-E556 products are relevant to the Real Exam format?

DumpsTool products focus each and every aspect of the AD0-E556 certification exam. You’ll find them absolutely relevant to your needs.

2. To what extent DumpsTool’s products are relevant to the exam format?

DumpsTool’s products are absolutely exam-oriented. They contain AD0-E556 study material that is Q&As based and comprises only the information that can be asked in actual exam. The information is abridged and up to the task, devoid of all irrelevant and unnecessary detail. This outstanding content is easy to learn and memorize.

3. What different products DumpsTool offers?

DumpsTool offers a variety of products to its clients to cater to their individual needs. DumpsTool Study Guides, AD0-E556 Exam Dumps, Practice Questions answers in pdf and Testing Engine are the products that have been created by the best industry professionals.

4. What is money back guarantee and how is it applicable on my failure?

The money back guarantee is the best proof of our most relevant and rewarding products. DumpsTool’s claim is the 100% success of its clients. If they don’t succeed, they can take back their money.

5. What is DumpsTool’s Testing Engine? How does it benefit the exam takers?

DumpsTool AD0-E556 Testing Engine delivers you practice tests that have been made to introduce you to the real exam format. Taking these tests also helps you to revise the syllabus and maximize your success prospects.

6. Does DumpsTool offer discount on its prices?

Yes. DumpsTool’s concentration is to provide you with the state of the art products at affordable prices. Round the year, special packages and discounted prices are also introduced.

AD0-E556 Questions and Answers

Question # 1

After evaluating global operations, the Marketing Operations team for a mid-sized organization determines that changes must be made to how many operational processes are running in their Adobe Marketo Engage instance. Some processes that cleanse and enrich the data being synced to Marketo Engage from Salesforce must be retired. The team negotiates a new process with Sales Operations to make values in certain data fields compulsory before a salesperson can save a new Contact in the CRM.

Before pushing this change live, which stakeholders must be enabled in the new process?

A.

The CMO. Data Analysts, the Head of Sales, and the Marketing team

B.

Sales Operations, Sales Representatives, Sales Managers, and Data Analysts

C.

CMO, CFO, Sales Operations, Head of Sales, and the Marketing team

D.

Marketing team, Sales Operations, and the Head of Sales

Question # 2

Refer to the case study.

UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE

Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.

Business issues and requirements

Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns. Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses

crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaignscontribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.

Staffing and leadership

Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.

Revenue sources

Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips."

Current and aspirational marketing technology

Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.

Current campaign management processes

A typical email campaign:

• Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from 300,000 to 1.5 million addresses

• Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada

• Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message

• Is static; there are no formula fields

• Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.

All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message. More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.

Current lead management and attribution

Unicorn's lead-management process follows

Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and "qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.

Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.

The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.

Current governance processes

Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.

Input of qualified leads from Marketable into

Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.

CMO

The CMO's most important concerns are:

• The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth

• Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones

• In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable

• The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue

• Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.

CIO

The CIO is concerned primarily with:

• The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives

• Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing

MARKETING STAFF

Marketing Operations staff concerns:

• Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to

• Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best

• Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and

fix

• Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for

Example.

o Webhook not firing,

o Reaching API limit

o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce

• Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns

Despite the absence of an external Sales team,

Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.

Some of Unicorn's customers use their financial products and services. Marketing wants to roll out a "Weekly rollup" email to customers who are opted in for email. This email will show a quick snapshot of how each product/service those customers have with Unicorn perform.

The data to send these emails must be set up to sync to the Adobe Marketo Engage instance for each customer. Each customer can own multiple of the same product, or a number of products/services.

How should this data be pushed into Marketo Engage to be used most effectively?

A.

Sync this data on the "Person' Level in a number of fields for "Product" or "Service"

Build Segmentations for Product and Service

Add Segments into the Email as Dynamic content for personalization

B.

Create a maximum of 3 fields for each piece of data for both Products and Services onto the "Person" Level

Add each field into Email Scripting tokens then use to turn the module on or off if they have less than 3 products

C.

Build two Custom Objects, one called "Products" and one called "Services" to link onto Person

with relevant fields

Use an Email Scripting token in the email so it can be personalized for each email recipient

Question # 3

Refer to the case study.

UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE

Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.

Business issues and requirements

Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns. Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a newloan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses

crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.

Staffing and leadership

Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.

Revenue sources

Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips."

Current and aspirational marketing technology

Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.

Current campaign management processes

A typical email campaign:

• Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from 300,000 to 1.5 million addresses

• Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada

• Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message

• Is static; there are no formula fields

• Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.

All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message. More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.

Current lead management and attribution

Unicorn's lead-management process follows

Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and "qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.

Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.

The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.

Current governance processes

Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.

Input of qualified leads from Marketable into

Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.

CMO

The CMO's most important concerns are:

• The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth

• Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones

• In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable

• The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue

• Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.

CIO

The CIO is concerned primarily with:

• The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives

• Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing

MARKETING STAFF

Marketing Operations staff concerns:

• Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to

• Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best

• Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and

fix

• Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for

Example.

o Webhook not firing,

o Reaching API limit

o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce

• Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns

Despite the absence of an external Sales team,

Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.

Unicorn reaches its Salesforce API limit daily, which causes a backlog of issues in each system. The workflow of the employees who have to use them is also heavily affected by this issue. It takes hours to days for the correct data to come into Adobe Marketo Engage and Salesforce but it's important for newleads to be synced after creation as soon as possible. The IT team has reviewed which applications are using the API and suspect Marketo Engage is the culprit.

Before raising their API limit, which two tasks should an Architect perform to resolve

A.

Change any third-party form integrations into Marketo Engage or Salesforce forms to cut down on additional API usage

B.

Change any additional Smart Campaigns with the 'Sync to SFDC workflow steps to Request Campaign that runs daily to reduce load

C.

Change from using 'Add to Salesforce Campaign' smart campaign workflow step, and instead use the native 'Marketo Program/Campaign' sync setup

D.

Change any additional Smart Campaigns with the 'Sync to SFDC workflow steps into batch campaigns that run daily to reduce load

E.

Remove any additional 'Sync to SFDC Workflow steps in Smart Campaigns other than the dedicated ones managing the sync

Question # 4

An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect joins a company and needs to audit a prospect engagement scoring model. The previous administrator did not properly set up or maintain the model. The Marketing and Sales teams identify all engagement elements they want the new revamped model to score on. The administrator needs to make improvements.

According to best practices, what are the three important elements for the Architect to consider when updating the scoring model? (Choose three.)

A.

Scoring tokens are in use for all scoring values in the model.

B.

The scoring for all form activities happens within the individual form Programs.

C.

The frequency of scoring is considered in the implementation of the model.

D.

All scoring triggers are held in an operational Program in Marketing Activities.

E.

Make sure only Leads are scored on this model, not the entire database.

F.

A new Channel is set up for "Scoring" and all Programs related to scoring use this Channel.

Question # 5

An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect is integrating a Marketo Engage instance for a nonprofit client with two different third-party platforms. The requirements are outlined below:

Scenario 1: Automatically clone existing default programs on Marketo, build the email using

the RSS feed of blog section, and schedule the email on every Thursday.

Scenario 2: Before deleting any record on Marketo, push the data to "Donor System".

How should the Marketo Engage Architect approach the platform integration?

A.

Scenario 1 - Use Webhook and Scenario 2 - Use REST API

B.

Scenario 1 - Use Email Scripting and Scenario 2 - Use REST API

C.

Scenario 1 - Use JavaScript API and Scenario 2 - Use REST API

D.

Scenario 1 - Use REST API and Scenario 2 - Use Webhook