Secure-Software-Design Questions and Answers

The task described involves assessing a document management application that has been in use for many years to ensure compliance with organizational policies. This typically falls under the category of a security strategy for legacy code. Legacy code refers to software that has been around for a while and may not have been designed with current security standards or organizational policies in mind. A security strategy for legacy code would involve reviewing and updating the application to meet current security requirements and organizational policies, ensuring that it remains secure and compliant over time.

References: The answer is based on standard practices for managing and securing legacy software systems, which include regular assessments and updates to align with current security standards and organizational policies1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Preventing the disclosure of sensitive information in application responses is primarily addressed by implementing proper Error Handling and Logging practices.

When errors occur, applications may inadvertently reveal sensitive data through detailed error messages. To mitigate this risk, error handling mechanisms should be designed to provide generic error messages to end-users, while detailed error information is logged securely for internal review. This approach ensures that sensitive information, such as system configurations, stack traces, or personal data, is not exposed to unauthorized users.

The OWASP Secure Coding Practices emphasize the importance of error handling and logging to prevent information leakage:

"Ensure that error messages displayed to users do not reveal sensitive information that can be exploited by attackers."

References:

OWASP Secure Coding Practices - Quick Reference Guide

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In the context of software security, a threat model is a structured representation that identifies potential threats to the system, evaluates their severity, and guides the development of mitigation strategies. When a security assessment reveals vulnerabilities or areas of concern, it's imperative to update the threat modeling artifacts to reflect these findings. This ensures that the threat model remains an accurate and current representation of the system's security posture.

By updating the threat modeling artifacts, the team documents the identified threats and outlines necessary coding and architectural changes to mitigate these threats. This proactive approach allows for the integration of security considerations early in the design and development phases, reducing the likelihood of vulnerabilities in the deployed system.

This practice aligns with the Design business function of the OWASP Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM), which emphasizes the importance of incorporating security into the software design process. Within this function, the Threat Assessment practice focuses on identifying and evaluating potential threats to inform security requirements and design decisions. Updating threat modeling artifacts is a key activity within this practice, ensuring that security assessments directly influence the system's design and architecture.

References:

OWASP SAMM: Design - Threat Assessment

The step of the PASTA threat modeling methodology where the team will capture infrastructure, application, and software dependencies is the Define technical scope step. This step involves detailing the technical elements of the project, which includes understanding and documenting the infrastructure, applications, and software dependencies that are critical to the system’s operation and security.

References: The PASTA (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) threat modeling methodology is a seven-step process that includes defining the technical scope as a critical step for capturing the necessary technical details of the system being analyzed123.

Data integrity requirements within a privacy impact statement ensure that personal information is maintained in an accurate and up-to-date manner. This involves establishing processes to regularly review and update personal data, as well as correct any inaccuracies. These requirements are crucial for maintaining the trustworthiness of the data and ensuring that decisions made based on this information are sound and reliable.

References:

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s guide on the Privacy Impact Assessment process emphasizes the importance of accuracy and currency of personal information1.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) outlines principles for data processing, including the necessity for data to be accurate and kept up to date2.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) also includes provisions for data protection impact assessments, which involve documenting processes before starting data processing3.

Penetration testing is an activity where a simulated attack is performed on a software product to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers. It is a proactive and authorized attempt to evaluate the security of an IT infrastructure by safely trying to exploit system vulnerabilities, including OS, service and application flaws, improper configurations, and risky end-user behavior. In the context of the Ship phase of the Security Development Lifecycle (SDL), penetration testing is conducted as a final check to uncover any potential security issues that might have been missed during previous phases. This ensures that the software product is robust and secure before it is released.

References:

The Ship phase of the SDL includes activities such as policy compliance review, vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, open-source licensing review, and final security and privacy reviews1.

Penetration testing is a critical component of the Ship phase, as it helps to identify and fix security vulnerabilities before the software is deployed2.

The deliverable that would aid a software security team in preparing a detailed schedule mapping security development lifecycle phases to the type of analysis they will execute is Security test plans. These plans are crucial as they outline the testing strategies and specific security tests that will be conducted during the development lifecycle to ensure the software meets the required security standards.

Security test plans are developed after the requirements and design phases and are used throughout the implementation, verification, and release phases. They include detailed instructions for security testing, criteria for success, and the types of security testing to be performed, such as static and dynamic analysis, penetration testing, and code review.

These plans are living documents that should be updated as new threats are identified and as the project evolves. They ensure that all team members understand the security goals, the risks, and the measures that need to be taken to mitigate those risks.

By having a well-defined security test plan, the team can ensure that security is not an afterthought but is integrated into every phase of the software development lifecycle, thus producing more secure software.

References: The importance of security test plans in the software development lifecycle is supported by best practices and guidelines from sources such as Microsoft’s Security Development Lifecycle1 and Snyk’s Secure Software Development Life Cycle principles2.

The last step of the SDLC code review process is to review the code for security issues. This involves a detailed examination of the code to identify any potential security vulnerabilities that could be exploited. It’s a critical phase where the focus is on ensuring that the code adheres to security best practices and does not contain any flaws that could compromise the security of the application or system. The process typically includes manual inspection as well as automated tools to scan for common security issues. The goal is to ensure that the software is as secure as possible before it is deployed. References: Mastering the Code Review Process, Understanding the SDLC, How Code Reviews Improve Software Quality in SDLC - LinkedIn.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario outlines the process of decommissioning a legacy application after a new product has successfully taken over its functions. This corresponds to the End of Life phase in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC).

The End of Life phase involves retiring outdated systems and transitioning users to newer solutions. This phase ensures that obsolete applications are systematically phased out, reducing maintenance costs and potential security vulnerabilities associated with unsupported software.

In this case, running both the legacy and new applications concurrently provided a safety net to ensure the new system's stability. After confirming the new product's reliability, the organization proceeds to disable the legacy system, marking its End of Life.

References:

Systems Development Life Cycle

The issue described involves a session management vulnerability where the user’s session remains active even after the browser window is closed, allowing another user on the same machine to access the application without logging in. To prevent this security risk, it’s essential to adjust the session management controls to include an automatic timeout feature. This means that after a period of inactivity, or when the browser window is closed, the session should automatically expire, requiring a new login to access the application. This adjustment ensures that even if a user forgets to log out, their session won’t remain active indefinitely, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

References:

Secure SDLC practices emphasize the importance of security at every stage of the software development life cycle, including the implementation of proper session management controls12.

Best practices for access control in security highlight the significance of managing session timeouts to prevent unauthorized access3.

Industry standards and guidelines often recommend session timeouts as a critical security control to protect against unauthorized access4.

Modifying the source code is typically associated with the patch management step in the change management process. Patch management involves the acquisition, testing, and installation of code changes, which can include updates, bug fixes, or improvements to existing software. This step ensures that modifications to the software are made in a controlled and systematic manner, maintaining the integrity and security of the software throughout the change.

References: The information provided aligns with industry-standard practices for change management in software engineering1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard that outlines the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS). Achieving ISO 27001 certification demonstrates an organization's commitment to information security and provides assurance to customers and stakeholders that security best practices are in place.

In the context of the software development life cycle (SDLC), post-release certifications refer to obtaining formal certifications, such as ISO 27001, after a product has been developed and released. This process involves a comprehensive assessment of the organization's information security practices to ensure they align with the standards set forth by ISO 27001. The certification process typically includes:

Gap Analysis: Evaluating existing information security measures against ISO 27001 requirements to identify areas needing improvement.

Implementation: Addressing identified gaps by implementing necessary policies, procedures, and controls.

Internal Audit: Conducting internal audits to verify the effectiveness of the ISMS and readiness for external assessment.

External Audit: Engaging an accredited certification body to perform a thorough evaluation, leading to certification if compliance is demonstrated.

By pursuing ISO 27001 certification post-release, the company aims to enhance its security posture, comply with international standards, and build trust with its customer base.

References:

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information Security Management Systems

Fuzzing is an automated or semi-automated software testing technique that involves providing invalid, unexpected, or random data to the inputs of a computer program1. This process is designed to uncover coding errors, security vulnerabilities, and other potential issues within the software by observing how it behaves under unexpected or malformed inputs. Fuzzing is particularly effective because it can expose corner cases that have not been properly dealt with and can be used to test programs that take structured inputs, such as file formats or protocols2.

References: 1: Wikipedia - Fuzzing 2: DZone - Fuzzing in Software Engineering

The term ‘availability’ in the context of Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SDL) refers to ensuring that systems, applications, and data are accessible to authorized users when needed. This means that the information must be timely and reliable, without undue delays or interruptions. Availability is a critical aspect of security, as it ensures that the software functions correctly and efficiently, providing users with the information they need to perform their tasks.

References:

The definition of availability as per the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Glossary1.

The Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) which emphasizes the importance of availability in secure software design2.

General principles of Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SSDLC) that include availability as a key security goal3.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario describes a stage where the developed features are deployed to a pre-production environment for verification by analysts. This aligns with the Testing phase of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC).

In the Testing phase, the system undergoes various evaluations to ensure it meets the specified requirements and functions correctly. This includes deploying the software in an environment that simulates production to identify and rectify defects before the actual deployment. The primary goal is to validate the software's quality and performance.

According to the SDLC framework, after the development (coding) phase, the next step is Testing, where the system is rigorously evaluated. This phase is crucial to detect issues that may not have been apparent during development and to ensure that the software operates as intended in a controlled setting before live deployment.

References:

Software Development Life Cycle Documentation

 The category that classifies identified threats with no defenses in place, exposing the application to exploits, is Unmitigated Threats. This term refers to vulnerabilities for which no countermeasures or mitigations have been implemented. These threats are critical because they represent actual weaknesses that attackers can exploit. In the context of secure software design, it’s essential to identify these threats early in the SDLC to ensure that appropriate security controls can be designed and implemented to protect against them.

References:

Taxonomy of Cyber Threats to Application Security and Applicable Defenses1.

OWASP Foundation’s Threat Modeling Process2.

Mitigating Persistent Application Security Threats3.