PMO-CP Questions and Answers

Sponsorship, particularly from upper management, is critical to the success of a PMO. A PMO without strong executive sponsorship often struggles to secure the resources, authority, and strategic alignment necessary to be effective. Therefore, the lack of sponsorship is a well-recognized cause of PMO failure.

Sponsorship Importance: Executive sponsorship provides the PMO with the necessary authority, visibility, and resources. It also helps align the PMO’s goals with the organization’s strategic objectives, ensuring that the PMO can deliver value.

Consequences of Poor Sponsorship: Without strong sponsorship, a PMO may lack the influence needed to enforce governance, gain stakeholder buy-in, or secure adequate funding. This often leads to a failure in meeting organizational expectations, resulting in the eventual dissolution or restructuring of the PMO.

PMI References: ThePMI’s Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3)and other PMI resources highlight the importance of executive sponsorship for PMO success. It emphasizes that sponsorship is a key driver of project success and sustainability.

PMI and PMO VALUE RING References:

PMI’s Standardsemphasize the critical role of sponsorship in project and portfolio management, noting that effective sponsorship ensures alignment with organizational goals, provides necessary resources, and helps navigate political challenges within the organization.

ThePMO VALUE RINGalso stresses the importance of stakeholder engagement and sponsorship as a core component of a successful PMO, directly linking sponsorship to the PMO's ability to deliver value.

The most common stakeholders of a PMO (Project Management Office) includeupper management, project managers, functional managers, and project team members. These stakeholders are directly involved in or affected by the PMO’s activities and performance.

Upper managementprovides strategic direction and ensures that the PMO aligns with organizational goals.

Project managersare responsible for executing projects and rely on the PMO for governance, methodologies, and support.

Functional managersoversee specific departments or areas and provide resources for projects.

Project team memberscontribute to the project deliverables and rely on the PMO for guidance and structure.

The involvement of these key stakeholders is crucial for ensuring that the PMO operates effectively and meets the organization’s expectations​​​.

The concept of balancing PMO functions refers to ensuring that the selected functions of a PMO are not only focused on immediate financial or operational benefits but are also capable of generating long-term value. This balance must take into account stakeholder needs and expectations, ensuring that value is perceived consistently over time. The PMO should not just reduce costs or improve efficiencies in the short term but also foster sustainable improvements and perceived value across various dimensions​​.

The functions of a PMO should be established by understanding the specific needs and expectations of stakeholders. By identifying what benefits stakeholders expect from the PMO, organizations can tailor the PMO's functions to serve these expectations effectively. Simply copying functions from industry benchmarks or adopting predefined models without considering stakeholder needs could lead to misalignment and inefficiencies​​.

TheROI (Return on Investment) of a PMOis directly influenced by theperformanceandmaturity level of each functionwithin the PMO. A high-performing function that has achieved a high level of maturity is more likely to contribute positively to the organization's overall success, thereby improving the ROI. The maturity level reflects the sophistication and effectiveness of how the PMO functions are managed, while performance indicates how well these functions deliver value to the organization​​​.

The ROI calculation for a PMO is based on its role in reducing portfolio losses and managing risks in the organization's projects. The PMO functions are evaluated based on their potential contribution to recovering these losses. Each organization may experience different causes for these losses, including inefficiencies, delays, and resource mismanagement. By reducing these factors, the PMO helps recover lost value, which is factored into the ROI calculation. This model emphasizes the alignment of the PMO’s functions with the organization’s strategic recovery objectives​​.

For a PMO to be successful and recognized, it mustgenerate perceived value for its stakeholders. This goes beyond just completing projects on time and within budget. Stakeholders need to see the tangible and intangible benefits the PMO delivers, such as alignment with strategic goals, improved governance, and enhanced project delivery efficiency. The PMO's ability to demonstrate its value and relevance to stakeholders is what leads to its recognition and success within the organization​​​.

The PMO VALUE RING methodology, developed by the PMO Global Alliance, provides a structured approach to ensure the continuous improvement and alignment of PMOs with organizational needs. The recommended evaluation cycle for the PMO VALUE RING is12 months, starting either from the PMO’s initial setup or its first evaluation.

Continuous Improvement: The 12-month evaluation cycle is crucial because it allows PMOs to adapt to changes in the organization, market, and project environment. By evaluating annually, PMOs can identify gaps, realign with strategic goals, and implement necessary improvements.

Performance Monitoring: An annual review helps monitor the PMO’s performance, assessing whether the expected value delivery aligns with stakeholder expectations. This cycle ensures that the PMO remains relevant and effective over time.

Flexibility: Although 12 months is the recommended cycle, the PMO VALUE RING methodology is flexible enough to allow for adjustments based on specific organizational needs. However, the 12-month cycle is a best practice for maintaining the PMO’s strategic alignment.

PMI and PMO VALUE RING References:

ThePMI’s Standard for Portfolio ManagementandPMI’s PMBOK Guideemphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and evaluation in project, program, and portfolio management. Regular cycles ensure that the PMO is effectively contributing to the organization's strategy.

ThePMO VALUE RINGprovides a clear framework for PMOs to follow, ensuring that value is consistently delivered. The 12-month cycle recommendation aligns with the principle of continuous improvement advocated by PMI.

By adhering to the 12-month evaluation cycle, PMOs can ensure they are always aligned with the organization's evolving needs, thus maximizing their value contribution.

==================

Follow-Up Questions:

How can a PMO integrate lessons learned from the 12-month PMO VALUE RING evaluation into its strategic planning process?

What are some potential risks of not following the recommended 12-month evaluation cycle for a PMO?

How can the PMO VALUE RING methodology be adapted to suit smaller organizations with limited resources?

Additional Resources:

PMI's PMBOK Guide

PMI’s Standard for Portfolio Management

PMO Global Alliance - PMO VALUE RING

Thetarget/desired maturity levelfor a function represents the level of sophistication or performance that the organization aims to achieve by the end of a specific evaluation cycle. This maturity level is set based on the organization's strategic goals, resource capabilities, and the PMO's roadmap for growth.

By defining the desired level of maturity, the organization ensures that it has a clear objective for improvement and can track progress over time. Achieving this level requires addressing gaps in processes, people, and technology​​​.