PMI-PBA Questions and Answers

 A traceability matrix is a document that the business analyst can use to determine the relationship of each requirement to the business need when working on Project Y. A traceability matrix is a table that shows how each requirement relates to other project artifacts, such as business needs, objectives, deliverables, design elements, test cases, or risks. A traceability matrix can help to ensure that each requirement is aligned with and contributes to the business need that initiated the project. It can also help to verify that each requirement is necessary, feasible, testable, and traceable throughout the project life cycle. A traceability matrix can also help to manage changes and measure progress in relation to the business need. A requirements baseline document is a version of the requirements specification that has been reviewed, approved, and formally established as the basis for further development and delivery of the solution. A requirements baseline document defines the scope of the project and the expected value of the solution. It does not show how each requirement relates to the business need explicitly. A requirements management plan is a document that describes how requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. A requirements management plan defines the roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools for managing requirements. It does not indicate the relationship of each requirement to the business need specifically. A requirements package is a document that presents the requirements in a structured and organized way for communication and verification purposes. A requirements package may include different types of requirements, such as functional, non-functional, quality, or transition requirements. It does not demonstrate how each requirement relates to the business need directly. A reliability matrix is not a standard document in business analysis, but it may refer to a tool that measures the reliability or dependability of a system or a process. A reliability matrix evaluates the performance or quality of a solution. It does not determine the relationship of each requirement to the business need. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

Functional specifications are a type of requirements documentation that describes what the system or product should do in terms of functions, features, behaviors, inputs, outputs, etc. Functional specifications can help the business analyst to document the requirements in a way that is clearly understood by the development team and provides enough information to check if the requirement has been met. Functional specifications can also include acceptance criteria, test cases, data models, user interface designs, etc. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 39.

The best approach to resolve this issue is to suggest re-estimating the requirement and following the change control process. This would allow the project team to assess the impact of the change request, evaluate the feasibility and cost of the modification, and obtain the approval of the stakeholders before implementing the change. A change control process is a method used to manage change requests for projects and big initiatives. It’s part of a change management plan, which defines the roles for managing change within a team or company1. Meeting with the customer and apologizing for misunderstanding the business’s need is not sufficient, as it does not address the root cause of the problem or propose a solution. Providing the stakeholder with a copy of the approved requirements baseline and moving forward without making a change is not acceptable, as it ignores the stakeholder’s feedback and dissatisfaction. Requiring development resources to work overtime to modify the deliverable to satisfy the stakeholder is not advisable, as it may compromise the quality of the work, increase the project cost and risk, and demoralize the team. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline2, PMI Guide to Business Analysis3, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, What Is a Change Control Process? (with Example Change Log)

Nonfunctional requirements are the characteristics or qualities of a solution that describe how well it performs or operates. They include aspects such as usability, reliability, availability, scalability, security, performance, etc. The website crashing frequently indicates that the nonfunctional requirements related to availability and performance were not identified and tested properly. Quality attributes are another term for nonfunctional requirements, so option A is equivalent to option C. Critical business requirements and essential product requirements are both functional requirements, which describe what a solution does or provides, not how well it does it. Therefore, options B and D are incorrect. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 114-115.

To reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project, the business analyst plans to reuse requirements. Requirements are statements that describe the needs, expectations, or capabilities of the stakeholders or the solution. Requirements can be reused from previous or similar projects, as long as they are relevant, consistent, and compatible with the current project context and objectives. Reusing requirements can help to save time and effort, avoid duplication or redundancy, leverage best practices, and ensure quality and compliance. Quantitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Quantitative analysis is a technique that involves using numerical data and methods to measure, compare, or evaluate the feasibility, value, or impact of a solution or an alternative. Quantitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. Risk assessments are not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Risk assessments are techniques that involve identifying and analyzing potential threats or uncertainties that may affect the project or the solution. Risk assessments can help to prioritize, mitigate, or monitor risks, but they do not provide requirements for the product specification. Qualitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Qualitative analysis is a technique that involves using descriptive data and methods to understand, interpret, or evaluate the characteristics, behaviors, or perceptions of the stakeholders or the solution. Qualitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 114-115; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

 One of the first steps of a project is to identify the stakeholders and their interests. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the project or its outcome. Identifying the stakeholders and their interests helps to understand their needs, expectations, roles, responsibilities, and communication preferences. It also helps to manage their involvement and engagement throughout the project life cycle, and to address any potential conflicts or issues that may arise. The other options are not the first steps of a project. Identifying the classes of users and their requirements is part of the requirements elicitation process, which occurs after the project initiation phase. Aligning the sponsor expectations along the project goals is part of the project charter development, which is also done after the project initiation phase. Evaluating the sources for requirements and prioritizing them is part of the requirements analysis process, which occurs after the requirements elicitation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 10; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50; 3.

Quality assurance is a function that involves applying quality standards and processes to ensure that the project or program meets the quality requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Quality assurance also involves auditing the quality requirements and the results of quality control measurements to ensure that appropriate quality standards and operational definitions are being used. Quality assurance helps to prevent defects and errors, improve customer satisfaction, and enhance the credibility and reputation of the organization. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 10, Section 10.3.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, Domain V: Evaluation, Task 3.

 A weighted-ranking matrix is a technique that involves assigning scores and weights to different criteria and options to compare and prioritize them. A weighted-ranking matrix can help the business analyst to prepare the recommendation by quantifying and ranking the three different solution options based on their alignment with the business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, and other factors. A weighted-ranking matrix can also help to justify and communicate the recommendation with evidence and transparency. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

 A traceability matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project life cycle. It helps to track changes in requirements, assess their impact, and ensure that they are met by the project deliverables. A traceability matrix is a useful tool for document control, as it records the version history of each requirement and the rationale for any changes. A statement of work, a project plan, and a problem or opportunity statement are not methods of document control, but rather documents that describe the project scope, objectives, activities, and justification. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9 1; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121 2

A cost-benefit analysis is a tool or technique that compares the expected costs and benefits of a project or an investment. It helps to determine the value of a business case by estimating the net present value (NPV) of the project, which is the difference between the present value of the benefits and the present value of the costs. A positive NPV indicates that the project is worth pursuing, while a negative NPV suggests that the project should be rejected. A cost-benefit analysis can also calculate the return on investment (ROI) of the project, which is the ratio of the net benefits to the net costs. A higher ROI implies a higher value of the business case. A cost-benefit analysis can also consider the qualitative aspects of the project, such as the risks, assumptions, constraints, and opportunities12.

A variance analysis is a tool or technique that compares the actual performance of a project with the planned or expected performance. It helps to identify and explain the deviations or differences between the actual and planned results, such as costs, schedule, scope, quality, and benefits. A variance analysis can also provide corrective actions or recommendations to improve the project performance and align it with the business case13.

A SWOT analysis is a tool or technique that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project, a business, or a situation. It helps to identify the internal and external factors that can affect the success or failure of the project or the business. A SWOT analysis can also provide strategies or actions to leverage the strengths and opportunities, and to overcome or mitigate the weaknesses and threats14.

A feasibility analysis is a tool or technique that assesses the viability and practicality of a project or a solution. It helps to determine if the project or the solution can be implemented within the available resources, time, budget, and technology. A feasibility analysis can also evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the project or the solution, and compare it with other alternatives15.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 123-124; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125-126; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 127-128; 5 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 129-130

 The business analyst should determine if the defect is in the solution developed, in the original requirement, or in the test case. This criterion will help the business analyst to identify the root cause of the defect, and to decide the appropriate response to the defective test result. Depending on the source of the defect, the business analyst may need to revise the requirement, update the test case, or request a change to the solution. The business analyst should also communicate the defect and the response to the relevant stakeholders, and document the discrepancy report accordingly. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 25; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 140.

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

The business analyst should explain the value of requirements traceability to the project sponsor. Requirements traceability is the process of tracking and documenting the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the project deliverables, and the business objectives. Requirements traceability helps to ensure the quality, completeness, and alignment of the requirements, and to manage the changes, risks, and issues that may arise during the project. Requirements traceability also helps to measure the performance and the value of the solution, and to facilitate the verification and validation of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 Prototyping is a tool or technique that could have been used by the business analyst to avoid the situation of unclear and conflicting requirements. Prototyping is the process of creating a simplified and partial version of the product or system that can be used to elicit, validate, and refine the requirements. Prototyping can help the business analyst and the stakeholders to visualize the solution, to identify and resolve any issues or gaps, and to reach a common understanding and agreement on the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 94.

 A change control process is a set of procedures that defines how changes to the requirements are identified, assessed, approved, implemented, and communicated. A change control process helps to ensure that changes are aligned with the business objectives, do not introduce unnecessary risks, and do not adversely affect the quality of the solution. A change control process also helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid scope creep. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

This is because it has the highest score in the “Lower maintenance cost” category, which has a weight of 2, and the second highest score in the “Improved customer satisfaction” category, which has a weight of 3. The weighted-ranking matrix is a technique that helps to compare and evaluate different options based on multiple criteria and their relative importance. Each option is assigned a score for each criterion, and the score is multiplied by the weight of the criterion. The option with the highest total score is the most preferred one.

 Value-ranking criteria are a set of factors or measures that are used to evaluate and prioritize the value of backlog items. Value-ranking criteria can include business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. The stakeholders follow the value-ranking criteria to determine the value of backlog items based on their alignment with the project vision and goals. The stakeholders can also use techniques such as MoSCoW analysis or weighted ranking matrix to apply the value-ranking criteria. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to demonstrate the features and functionality of a product or solution in an iterative manner. A prototype can help to elicit, validate, and verify requirements, as well as to obtain feedback and approval from stakeholders. A prototype can also help to reduce risks, errors, and rework, and to increase customer satisfaction and quality. A proof-of-concept model is a type of prototype that is used to test the feasibility and viability of a product or solution. A proof-of-concept model can help to show the benefits and value of the product or solution, and to identify any technical or business challenges or constraints. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

One benefit of documenting the change control process is that stakeholders know how to request changes. The change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or requirements are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. Documenting the change control process helps to establish clear and consistent guidelines and procedures for managing changes and ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. Documenting the change control process also helps to inform the stakeholders about how to request changes, what information and justification are required, who is responsible for reviewing and approving changes, and what criteria and methods are used for assessing the impact and value of changes. Stakeholders are not shielded from how changes are assessed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they are excluded or unaware of the change evaluation and decision making process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to increase transparency, collaboration, and communication among the stakeholders regarding changes. Stakeholders do not have a schedule of changes to be deployed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a predetermined or fixed plan of when and how changes will be implemented. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to ensure that changes are implemented in a timely and effective manner based on their priority, feasibility, and dependency. Stakeholders do not understand the difficulty of managing requirements by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a negative or pessimistic view of the requirements management process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to improve the quality and stability of the requirements and reduce ambiguity, confusion, or conflicts among the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 163-164; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 20.

A decision tree is a tool that can be used to analyze how the system responds to various combinations of input conditions with the probability of each outcome. A decision tree is a graphical representation of a decision problem that shows the possible choices and their consequences. A decision tree can help to evaluate the expected value of each alternative and choose the optimal one. Functional decomposition is a tool that can be used to break down a complex system or process into smaller and simpler components. Expected monetary value is a tool that can be used to calculate the average outcome of a decision under uncertainty by multiplying the value of each outcome by its probability and summing them up. Weighted criteria is a tool that can be used to prioritize requirements or alternatives based on their importance and performance scores. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

A review of the solution prototype would be the most viable technique to use in this scenario for validating requirements through in-person sessions. A solution prototype is a simplified version of part or all of a solution that can be used to elicit feedback from stakeholders. A review of a solution prototype involves presenting or demonstrating it to stakeholders and asking them questions to assess their satisfaction, understanding, agreement, or concerns. A review of a solution prototype can help to validate that the solution meets the stakeholder requirements and delivers value to them. A brainstorming session is a technique for generating ideas or solutions by encouraging free and creative thinking from participants. A brainstorming session can help to elicit or analyze requirements but not validate them. A use-case development session is a technique for creating use cases that describe how actors interact with a system to achieve their goals. A use-case development session can help to elicit or specify requirements but not validate them. A review of the previous version is a technique for examining an existing solution or product to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats. A review of the previous version can help to elicit or analyze requirements but not validate them. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

 Prototyping is a technique that involves creating a simplified or partial version of the solution to elicit feedback from the stakeholders. Prototyping can help the business analyst to deal with a complex project with stakeholders who find it difficult to articulate their needs by providing a visual and interactive representation of the solution. Prototyping can also help to reduce requirements risk by validating or verifying the requirements, identifying gaps or errors, and resolving ambiguities or conflicts. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

 Using a table to map business rules to functional requirements ensures that all tax and fee calculations are implemented correctly. It helps in verifying that the system reflects current regulations and avoids calculation errors. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

Verification is the process of ensuring that the requirements meet a quality checklist and conform to the specified standards, rules, and criteria. Verification can help the business analyst to ensure that all requirements meet a quality checklist before the development and testing phase by checking the completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability of each requirement. Verification can also help to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or ambiguities in the requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 The requirements baseline is a document that contains the approved and validated requirements that are used as the basis for developing the solution. The requirements baseline defines the scope and boundaries of the product development, as it specifies what the product must do, what features and functions it must have, and what criteria it must meet to satisfy the stakeholders’ needs and expectations. The requirements baseline also serves as a reference point for measuring the progress and performance of the product development, as well as for managing changes and resolving issues. The requirements baseline is established after the requirements have been elicited, analyzed, prioritized, and verified by the business analyst and the stakeholders, and it is formally approved by the project sponsor or other authorized person. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 A RACI matrix is a tool that defines the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in a project or a process. It clarifies who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each task or deliverable. The business analyst should refer to the RACI matrix to identify who is responsible for signoff, as this person has the authority and accountability to approve the solution and its testing results. Contacting the sponsor, the stakeholder who provided the majority of requirements, or the project manager may not be appropriate, as they may not be the designated person for signoff according to the RACI matrix. No signoff is necessary is incorrect, as signoff is an important step to confirm that the solution meets the requirements and acceptance criteria. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to their sources, objectives, and deliverables. It helps to track the status, changes, and verification of each requirement throughout the project life cycle. If the requirements traceability matrix was not updated with the change, it could result in a key requirement being missed or overlooked in the implementation. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. The requirements management plan is a document that describes how the requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed. The scope management plan is a document that describes how the project scope will be defined, controlled, and verified. The schedule management plan is a document that describes how the project schedule will be developed, monitored, and controlled. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39; 6.

An interview is a technique that involves a structured or unstructured conversation between the business analyst and one or more stakeholders to elicit information, opinions, or feedback about a topic. An interview can be conducted face-to-face, over the phone, or through other communication channels. An interview can be prepared in advance with a list of questions or topics to cover, or it can be spontaneous and flexible. An interview can be used to explore the needs, expectations, preferences, or concerns of the stakeholders, as well as to clarify, verify, or validate the requirements. An interview is suitable for a project involving a low number of stakeholders, as it allows the business analyst to establish rapport, ask probing questions, and obtain detailed and specific information from each stakeholder. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

 Communication is a technique that involves exchanging information and feedback with stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. Communication can help the business analyst to deal with conflicting requirements by informing the stakeholders about the nature, cause, and impact of the conflict, and facilitating a resolution that satisfies their needs and expectations. Communication can also help to prevent or reduce future conflicts by establishing clear and consistent channels, methods, and frequency of communication. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 61.

The system requirements verification matrix is a tool that helps to track the status of each requirement throughout the project lifecycle. It shows whether a requirement has been accepted, rejected, deferred, or implemented. The business analyst should have used this tool to record the reasons for rejection or deferral of any requirement, as well as the impact and resolution of such changes. This way, the business analyst can easily provide a list of rejected and deferred requirements to the project manager upon request. Setting up a change control board is not enough to track the number of rejections, as it does not provide a detailed record of each requirement’s status. Limiting the number of rejected requirements on the project is not a realistic or helpful approach, as some requirements may be invalid, incomplete, or conflicting and need to be rejected or deferred for the benefit of the project. Spending more time up-front reviewing the requirements may reduce the chances of rejections, but it does not guarantee that no requirement will be rejected or deferred later in the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

The change management plan outlines the process for managing changes to requirements, ensuring that any revisions are controlled and documented throughout the project lifecycle. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

Requirements management is a method for requirements change control. Requirements management is a process that involves planning, monitoring, and controlling the requirements and the solution throughout the project lifecycle. Requirements management can help the business analyst to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they align with the business needs and objectives. Requirements management can also help to handle changes to the requirements and the solution, and to communicate the impact and implications of the changes to the stakeholders. Requirements management can be done using various tools and techniques, such as a requirements management plan, a requirements traceability matrix, a change control system, and a configuration management system52. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 133.

When a business analyst uses subject matter experts to define roles and identify influencers, the project artifact that is created or updated is the stakeholder register. The stakeholder register is a document that identifies and records information about the stakeholders who are involved in or affected by the project or the solution. The stakeholder register can include information such as stakeholder names, roles, responsibilities, interests, expectations, influence levels, communication preferences, etc. The business analyst can use subject matter experts as sources of information or advice to help define roles and identify influencers among the stakeholders. Subject matter experts are individuals who have specialized knowledge or expertise in a specific domain or area related to the project or the solution. A RACI matrix is not a project artifact that is created or updated when a business analyst uses subject matter experts to define roles and identify influencers. A RACI matrix is a tool that defines and clarifies the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder for each task or deliverable in the project. A RACI matrix can use four categories: Responsible (who performs the task), Accountable (who approves or oversees the task), Consulted (who provides input or feedback for the task), and Informed (who is notified of the task outcome). A SWOT analysis is not a project artifact that is created or updated when a business analyst uses subject matter experts to define roles and identify influencers. A SWOT analysis is a technique that involves identifying and evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an organization, a project, or a solution. A SWOT analysis can help to assess the internal and external factors that may affect the performance or value of an organization, a project, or a solution. A stakeholder management plan is not a project artifact that is created or updated when a business analyst uses subject matter experts to define roles and identify influencers. A stakeholder management plan is a document that describes how the stakeholders will be engaged, communicated with, managed, and satisfied throughout the project lifecycle. A stakeholder management plan can include strategies, actions, tools, and metrics for stakeholder management. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 34-35; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 14-15.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a context diagram is a model that shows the boundaries of an area of analysis, such as a project, a system, a process, or an organization. A context diagram depicts the main entities or actors involved in the area of analysis, and the interactions or data flows between them. A context diagram can help to ensure the most effective representation of analysis boundary, as it provides a high-level overview of the scope and context of the area of analysis, and helps to identify the key stakeholders and their relationships. A context diagram can also help to communicate and validate the scope and context with the stakeholders, and to identify any assumptions or risks related to the area of analysis. A data flow diagram, a state diagram, and an entity relationship diagram are other models that can help to analyze an area of analysis, but they do not necessarily show the boundary or scope of it. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 158-159.

Requirements baseline is the approved version of the requirements document that serves as a reference point for further changes. Requirements can be changed after they are baselined through a defined process that involves submitting a change request, analyzing the impact of the change, obtaining approval from the stakeholders, updating the requirements document, and communicating the change to the project team and other affected parties. Requirements can be changed at any stage of the project life cycle as long as they follow the defined process. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 A force-field analysis is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the factors or forces that support or oppose a change or an initiative. It can help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative by showing the pros and cons of the initiative, as well as the relative strength and importance of each factor. A force-field analysis can also help to develop strategies to increase the supporting forces or decrease the opposing forces, or both, to achieve the desired outcome. A PEST analysis is a tool that helps to examine the external factors that affect an organization or an initiative, such as political, economic, social, and technological factors. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the internal factors or the balance of forces. A feasibility analysis is a tool that helps to evaluate the viability and suitability of a project or an initiative, as well as the risks and benefits associated with it. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the supporting and opposing forces. A gap analysis is a tool that helps to compare the current state and the desired state of a process, a product, or a service, and identify the gaps or differences between them. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the factors or forces that influence the initiative. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, What is Force Field Analysis: Definition and Example

 A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that shows the relationship between each requirement and other project elements, such as objectives, deliverables, test cases, design components, etc. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to determine the impact for the specific requirement change by showing how the change affects other related requirements and project elements. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to assess the feasibility, scope, value, and risk of the change request. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, planning the requirements change process involves defining how requirement changes will be identified, analyzed, approved, and communicated throughout the project life cycle. Communication is a key aspect of managing requirement changes, as it ensures that all stakeholders are aware of the status, impact, and rationale of the changes, and that they can provide their feedback and input. How requirement changes will impact the requirements baseline, how they will be implemented, and how they will impact the validation plan are all important considerations, but they are not part of planning the requirements change process. They are part of executing, monitoring, and controlling the requirements change process. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 286-287.

Managing solution scope is the task of ensuring that the solution meets the agreed-upon requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Managing solution scope involves analyzing the impact of any changes to the scope, assessing the feasibility and risks of the changes, and obtaining approval from the stakeholders before implementing the changes. Managing solution scope can help the business analyst to identify the impacts, dependencies, or risks associated with the addition to the scope. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 83.

A configuration management system is a standardized, effective, and efficient way to manage changes to project documentation. A configuration management system is a set of tools and processes that help to track, control, and update the configuration items (CIs) of a project, such as documents, requirements, designs, code, tests, etc. A configuration management system helps to ensure that the project documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date throughout the project life cycle. It also helps to maintain the traceability and auditability of the changes made to the project documentation. A configuration management system typically includes the following components:

A configuration management plan that defines the scope, roles, responsibilities, policies, procedures, and standards for configuration management.

A configuration management database (CMDB) that stores the information about the CIs, their attributes, relationships, versions, baselines, and changes.

A configuration identification process that assigns unique identifiers and names to the CIs and their versions.

A configuration control process that evaluates, approves, and implements changes to the CIs and their versions.

A configuration status accounting process that records and reports the status and history of the CIs and their versions.

A configuration verification and audit process that verifies and validates the CIs and their versions against the requirements and specifications.

References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 13.

The best course of action to take when the customer reports defects after implementation of the product is to compare reported defects with user acceptance test results. User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. By comparing reported defects with user acceptance test results, the business analyst can determine whether the defects were already detected and resolved during UAT, whether they were missed or overlooked during UAT, or whether they emerged after UAT due to changes in the environment, configuration, data, or usage. This can help to assess the impact and severity of the defects and decide on the appropriate actions to address them. Escalating the issue to the project manager since the acceptance was given by the customer is not helpful, as it does not involve investigating or resolving the defects. Doing nothing since the solution is now the responsibility of the operations manager is not responsible, as it does not ensure customer satisfaction or solution quality. Involving the end users and planning a new round of acceptance tests to check the gaps is not feasible, as it may be costly, time-consuming, and disruptive to conduct another UAT after implementation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

A requirements baseline is a set of approved requirements that serves as the basis for further development and validation. A requirements baseline approval form is a document that records the formal acceptance of the requirements baseline by the customer and other stakeholders. Creating a requirements baseline approval form for the customer to review and approve is the best action to take to establish an approved requirements baseline with the customer. The other actions are not sufficient or appropriate for this purpose. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to their sources, objectives, and deliverables, but it does not record the approval of the requirements. Requesting that the customer create a baseline of the requirements in the contract specification is not a proactive or collaborative approach. Performing a variance analysis on the design specification and reporting the results to the customer is not relevant to establishing an approved requirements baseline. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

The business analyst should use a traceability matrix to help communicate the status of the requirements. A traceability matrix is a document that shows the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, and tracks their changes, verification, and validation throughout the project life cycle. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst and the project manager to monitor the progress and quality of the requirements, and to identify any gaps, issues, or risks. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

Requirements status during the project development cycle is the information that should be reported to the stakeholder who wants to know how the implementation of new features in the development of a product is progressing. The requirements status shows how many requirements are in each stage of the development cycle, such as analysis, design, development, testing, or deployment. This information can help the stakeholder understand the progress and quality of the product development and identify any issues or risks that may affect the delivery of the new features. Distribution of project changes is not relevant to the implementation of new features, as it shows how many changes have been requested, approved, or rejected for the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality. Number of requirements approved vs. number of requirements rejected is not relevant to the implementation of new features, as it shows how many requirements have been accepted or discarded by the stakeholders during the requirements analysis phase. Number of requirements tested and approved is not sufficient to report the implementation of new features, as it only shows how many requirements have passed the verification and validation process, but not how many are still in development or deployment stages. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

 Engaging all stakeholders early in the requirements gathering phase is a good practice to ensure stakeholder satisfaction with the enhancement. By involving the stakeholders in the elicitation process, the business analyst can understand their needs, expectations, preferences, and constraints. By defining the acceptance criteria with the stakeholders, the business analyst can establish a clear and measurable definition of what constitutes a successful solution. Engaging all stakeholders early can also help to build trust, collaboration, and buy-in for the change. Requesting that the project manager identify all affected project stakeholders is not sufficient to ensure stakeholder satisfaction, as it does not involve direct communication with the stakeholders. Providing all signed-off project documentation to the stakeholders for information purposes only is not effective, as it does not allow for feedback or validation from the stakeholders. Soliciting feedback and adding requirements to the project backlog is not advisable, as it can lead to scope creep, rework, and delays. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 66.

Observation is a technique that involves watching how people perform their work in their natural environment. Observation can help the business analyst to understand the company’s current business processes, identify pain points, and discover opportunities for improvement. Observation can also help to validate or verify the information obtained from other sources, such as interviews or documents. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 61.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to elicit, analyze, and validate requirements. A prototype is a representation of a solution that allows stakeholders to interact with it and provide feedback. By developing a prototype, the business analyst can gather functional requirements from the end user and ensure that the new interface supports their core business processes. A prototype can also help to reduce ambiguity, resolve conflicts, and increase stakeholder satisfaction. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, the business analyst should recommend the option with the highest functionality score and the lowest cost score. In this case, option A, 1, Custom solution, has the highest functionality score of 10 and the lowest cost score of 1. Therefore, it should be recommended. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Traceability and Monitoring is to “Track the status, priority, and disposition of requirements and issues, and communicate updates as necessary” (Task 1). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for ensuring that the requirements are delivered as stated and that any changes or issues are communicated to the relevant stakeholders. One of the techniques that can be used to perform this task is the traceability matrix, which is a table that shows the relationships between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design documents, test cases, or deliverables. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to verify that all the requirements are covered by the test cases and that the test output matches the expected results. Therefore, the technique that the business analyst could have used to ensure that requirements were delivered as stated is the traceability matrix.

The business analyst should check the traceability matrix to identify affected use cases. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to find out which use cases are related to the new set of regulations, and how they will impact the scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk of the project. The business analyst should also communicate the changes to the relevant stakeholders, and update the requirements documentation and the business analysis plan accordingly. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 The technical staff and testing team from Company A are responsible for writing and coding the requirements and testing the new functionality. Responsible means that the person or group is assigned to perform the work or activity. The responsible role is often indicated by the letter R in a RACI matrix, which is a tool for identifying roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2.3; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 2.

 The business analyst can determine the impact of a new requirement on existing requirements by reviewing the requirements traceability matrix. The requirements traceability matrix is a tool that tracks the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, as well as other project elements such as design, test cases, risks, or issues. By reviewing the requirements traceability matrix, the business analyst can identify which existing requirements are affected by the new requirement and assess the impact of the change on the scope, schedule, cost, or quality of the project. Performing a stakeholder analysis is not a way to determine the impact of a new requirement on existing requirements, as it focuses on identifying and understanding the needs, expectations, and influence of the stakeholders, not the requirements. Using time-boxing to defer the new requirement is not a way to determine the impact of a new requirement on existing requirements, as it postpones the analysis and implementation of the new requirement until a later iteration or phase of the project. Updating the use case documentation is not a way to determine the impact of a new requirement on existing requirements, as it only reflects how the new requirement affects one aspect of the solution functionality, not the entire project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19.

 A version control system is a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A version control system is a tool that allows the business analyst to manage and record changes to the requirements documentation throughout the project lifecycle. A version control system can help to ensure that the requirements documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date. A version control system can also help to facilitate collaboration and communication among the team members and stakeholders who work on or use the requirements documentation. A version control system can also help to identify and resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise from concurrent or conflicting changes to the requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is a technique that involves grouping similar or related ideas, issues, or data into categories based on their affinity or similarity. An affinity diagram can help to organize and analyze complex or diverse information, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A data dictionary is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes that are used or produced by a system or a solution. A data dictionary can help to standardize and clarify the meaning and usage of data elements, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is a tool that documents and organizes the business rules that govern or constrain a system or a solution. A business rules matrix can help to specify and communicate the logic and behavior of a system or a solution, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

 Solution scope is the set of features and functions that define the boundaries of the solution and align with the business requirements. Solution scope describes what will be included in and excluded from the new system, and helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid scope creep. The business analyst has defined the solution scope by working with project team members to define what will be included in and excluded from the new system. The other options are not correct. Solution design is the process of creating a detailed specification of how the solution will meet the requirements. Business requirements are the higher-level needs or goals of the organization or stakeholders that justify the project. Business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project based on its expected benefits, costs, and risks. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

The decision-making process in the business analysis plan defines how decisions will be made regarding the requirements and the business analysis approach. It specifies the roles and responsibilities of the decision makers, the criteria and methods for making decisions, and the process for resolving conflicts and disagreements. Having a clear decision-making process can help the business analyst facilitate the requirements workshop and reach an agreement among the stakeholders with different points of view and priorities. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 13.