ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Questions and Answers

The actions that should be taken in the context of the audit are:

•Option B: Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body. This option is correct because the auditor has found serious and significant gaps in the QMS processes that affect the health and safety of the patients, which is a major nonconformity that may warrant suspension of certification. The auditor should inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme of the situation and the audit findings, and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body and the credibility of the certification scheme. The auditor should also follow the Certification Body’s procedures and rules for suspension of certification and communicate the decision and the consequences to the auditee.

•Option C: Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. This option is correct because the auditor should not terminate or postpone the closing meeting due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as the DCM is the auditee’s nominated representative for the audit. The auditor should continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and the audit findings, and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. The auditor should also explain the audit outcome recommendation and the suspension of certification, and request the DCM to acknowledge the receipt and understanding of the audit results.

The following options are not correct:

•Option A: Close the meeting immediately after the DCM’s response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit. This option is not correct because the auditor should not close the meeting without presenting the audit conclusions and the audit findings, as this would violate the audit principles of fairness and transparency. The auditor should also not advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit, as this would imply that the auditor is accepting the auditee’s delay and inaction, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously.

•Option D: Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work. This option is not correct because the auditor should not conclude the meeting early or reschedule it due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as this would disrupt the audit process and the audit schedule. The auditor should also not wait for the Catering Manager to return to work, as this would delay the communication and resolution of the major nonconformity, and potentially compromise the health and safety of the patients.

•Option E: Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not recommend or prescribe specific corrective actions to the auditee, as this would violate the audit principles of independence and objectivity. The auditor should only report the audit findings and the audit outcome recommendation, and leave the responsibility and authority for determining and implementing the corrective actions to the auditee.

•Option F: Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS, as this would imply that the auditor is satisfied and optimistic with the auditee’s performance and response, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously. The auditor should instead express the concern and dissatisfaction with the auditee’s QMS processes and the impact on the health and safety of the patients, and communicate the suspension of certification and the need for urgent and effective corrective actions.

In this scenario, the audit team leader must balance maintaining the integrity of the audit plan while considering the auditee’s request. The two best responses allow for flexibility without compromising the audit's rigor:

A. I could audit the other laboratories virtually at the end of this audit: Virtual audits can be a valid option, especially in multi-site audits. ISO 9001:2015 does not prohibit virtual audits, and in certain situations, they are practical for reviewing documentation or observing operations remotely.

C. I could try to revise the audit programme to see if I can audit all laboratories: Revising the audit programme to accommodate additional site visits is a reasonable compromise. ISO 9001:2015 audits are based on risk and sampling, but the audit team leader has the flexibility to adjust the audit scope if it fits within the audit duration and resources.

The other options, such as extending the audit duration (B, F) or strictly adhering to the original plan (D, E), may not be practical or necessary. Revising the plan to audit all laboratories or using virtual auditing ensures that the audit remains efficient while addressing the organization's concerns​.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The audit schedule provides a structured timeline of activities to be conducted during the audit.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.2 – Preparing the Audit Plan:

Requires the development of an audit schedule, including the sequence and timing of activities.

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.3 – Audit Program:

Certification bodies must establish a schedule for conducting audits.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

The audit schedule ensures systematic execution of the audit by defining activities, responsible auditors, and timeframes.

A well-planned schedule improves efficiency and helps auditors cover all necessary areas within the given time.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Audit objectives) → Define why the audit is conducted, not the schedule.

B (Audit criteria) → Define the standards and requirements to be evaluated, not the timeline.

D (Audit offer) → Refers to the initial proposal sent to the auditee, not the activity timeline.

The purpose of conducting a document review is to determine the conformity of the system, as far as documented, with audit criteria and to gather information to support the audit activities. A document review is a systematic and objective examination of the documented information that is relevant to the audit objectives and scope. It can help the auditor to verify if the documented information is complete, accurate, consistent, and up-to-date. It can also help the auditor to identify any gaps, errors, or nonconformities in the documented information that may affect the audit findings or conclusions.

The other options are not correct because they do not reflect the true purpose of a document review. Option A describes the purpose of an audit report, which is to communicate the audit results and recommendations to the management and other interested parties. Option B describes the purpose of an audit plan, which is to define the scope, objectives, criteria, methods, resources, and schedule of an audit. Option C describes the purpose of an audit evidence report, which is to provide evidence of nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during an audit. Option D describes the purpose of an audit decision report, which is to justify or explain why certain decisions were made during an audit.

I hope this answer helps you understand why option F is correct and why options A-C-D are incorrect. If you want to learn more about ISO 9001 Lead Auditor exam questions and answers, you can check out some of these resources:

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Sample Exam Questions and Answers: This article provides some sample questions and answers for each section of the ISO 9001 Lead Auditor exam.

ISO 9001 (QMS) Lead Auditor Quiz Questions and Answers: This article provides some quiz questions and answers on various topics related to ISO 9001 QMS.

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor - Exam Practice Tests: This course offers practice tests with explanations for each question.

Irca Lead Auditor Exam Questions And Answers Pdf: This document contains some exam questions and answers in PDF format.

Based on the scenario and the concept of an ‘audit trail’ within the context of ISO 9001, the three statements that apply would likely be:

A. Decisions on improvement action timescales not involving departmental managers. This indicates a lack of involvement and communication with those responsible for implementing the improvements, which is a key part of an effective audit trail1.

B. Evaluation of the results of the improvement action not always documented by the Quality Manager. Proper documentation is essential for an audit trail, as it provides evidence that actions have been evaluated and are effective1.

C. Limited knowledge of the content of Quality Improvement Requests by departmental staff. An audit trail should ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and understand the actions being taken, which is not the case here1.

These points suggest issues with the communication, documentation, and involvement of relevant personnel in the quality management system processes, which are crucial for maintaining an effective audit trail and, by extension, a robust quality management system.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes the importance of communication as part of an effective Quality Management System (QMS).

Clause References:

Clause 7.4 (Communication): This requires organizations to establish what, when, with whom, and how communication should take place to ensure effectiveness.

Quality Management Principle – Engagement of People: Effective communication allows stakeholders (employees, suppliers, customers) to fully participate and contribute to quality objectives.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

Appropriate communication means ensuring that messages are clear, relevant, and accessible to the intended audience.

Different stakeholders (employees, customers, regulatory bodies, suppliers) may require different formats, languages, or media to ensure they fully understand and engage.

This aligns with ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes that communication must be tailored to the needs of the recipient for maximum effectiveness.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Timely responses) → Important but does not specifically refer to appropriateness in communication.

C (Communicating processes and assumptions to all interested parties) → Communication should be relevant; sharing all details might not be necessary or appropriate.

D (Only top management handling external communication) → Communication must be distributed across relevant functions, not restricted to leadership.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.9 (Audit Conclusions):

Audit conclusions must be based on verified evidence.

The evidence must be evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively to ensure accuracy.

Observations alone (A) are insufficient; conclusions must be supported by objective evidence.

Thus, B is the correct answer.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.1.1, the organization is required to determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to ensure valid results, and when the monitoring and measuring shall be performed. The organization is also required to retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the results.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the organization should have planned for monitoring and measuring the billet temperature, as it is a critical factor for the quality of the product and the process. The organization should also have established a procedure that provides instruction in taking billet temperature, using the pyrometer or other suitable methods, to ensure consistency and accuracy. The organization should also have performed periodic analysis of the results of temperature checks, to identify trends, problems, and opportunities for improvement.

Hence, the options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001 are A, E, and F, as they are aligned with the requirements of the clause. The other options are either irrelevant or not directly related to clause 9.1.1, as they do not pertain to the monitoring and measurement of the billet temperature.

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Clause 8.5.3 – Property Belonging to Customers or External Providers:This clause requires the organization to care for customer property while it is under their control. If there is damage, they must inform the customer and retain documented information. Thus, informing customers of the reason for laundry damage relates directly to this clause.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.3

Clause 7.1.3 b – Infrastructure:It refers to the provision and maintenance of infrastructure necessary for the operation of processes. This includes equipment. If resources are not allocated for outdated equipment, it directly breaches this clause.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.3 b

Clause 10.2.1 b – Corrective Action:This clause covers actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities to prevent recurrence, including evaluating and correcting customer complaints.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.1 b

Clause 5.1.2 b – Customer Focus (Top Management):Top management must ensure risks to customer satisfaction, including property damage, are addressed. This aligns with addressing the risk of damaging customer laundry.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 5.1.2 b

Clause 6.2 – Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them:Setting objectives for reducing customer complaints (like those about laundry damage) falls under this clause.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.2

In the context of ISO 9001:2015 audits, it is the audit team leader who holds the responsibility for assigning work to the audit team. According to ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for auditing management systems, which complements ISO 9001:2015), the audit team leader is responsible for the organization and direction of the audit, including assigning specific roles and responsibilities to audit team members. This includes preparation of the audit plan, leading the audit, and ensuring that each team member understands their tasks.

Nonconformity report

ISO 9001 Clause Number: 9.3.1 Nature of problem: Management review has not been conducted at the defined frequency. ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled: ISO 9001 - “Top management shall review the organization’s quality management system at planned intervals.” Evidence: The last management review took place nine months ago, and the previous one took place one year before the latest review. The planned interval is six months.

 Understanding "Context of the Organization":

The term "context of the organization" is defined in ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1, which states:

"The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended result(s) of its quality management system."

The definition emphasizes identifying both internal and external issues that influence the organization's approach to developing and achieving its objectives.

 Option Analysis:

Option A:Correct. This option aligns with the standard definition as it explicitly mentions the combination of internal and external issues that affect the organization’s approach to achieving its objectives, which is the essence of Clause 4.1.

Option B:Incorrect. The term "comparison of internal and external issues" does not reflect the ISO 9001 requirements. The standard does not require a comparison but rather an understanding of these issues.

Option C:Incorrect. Although it mentions "complexity," the focus of ISO 9001:2015 is on identifying relevant issues rather than the complexity of those issues.

Option D:Incorrect. This option mentions "coordination" and focuses only on the positive or negative effects. ISO 9001 requires identifying issues but does not emphasize coordination.

 Clause Reference and Relevance:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to understand their context because internal and external factors can influence the Quality Management System's effectiveness. Understanding this context helps in:

Addressing risks and opportunities (Clause 6.1).

Aligning the QMS with the organization’s strategic direction.

 Why A is Correct:

"Combination of internal and external issues" captures the essence of Clause 4.1, making it the accurate definition of the context of the organization.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 3.2, audit criteria are a set of policies, procedures or requirements used as a reference against which objective evidence is compared. Audit criteria are usually selected by the audit client or by agreement between the audit client and the auditee, and they should be appropriate for the audit scope and objectives1. Audit criteria may include, but are not limited to, the following sources2:

•ISO management system standards, such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, etc.

•Verbal statements by the general manager or other top management, as long as they are consistent with the documented policies and objectives of the organisation

•Verbal agreements with interested parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators, etc., as long as they are documented and approved by the relevant authorities

•Health and safety notices, such as posters, signs, labels, etc., that communicate the organisation’s legal obligations, policies, or procedures

•Written agreements with interested parties, such as contracts, orders, specifications, etc., that define the requirements and expectations of the parties involved

•Organisation’s documented information, such as policies, procedures, manuals, records, etc., that describe the organisation’s management system and its processes

•Commitment to follow principles issued by an NGO, such as the United Nations Global Compact, the International Labour Organization, etc., as long as they are relevant to the organisation’s context and objectives

•Environmental aspects register, such as a list of the environmental impacts and risks associated with the organisation’s activities, products, and services

Therefore, the two options that are not potential audit criteria are F and H, as they are not reliable or verifiable sources of information, and they may not reflect the actual performance or conformity of the organisation’s management system. Commercial advertisements and claims made on the organisation’s website are forms of marketing communication that may be exaggerated, misleading, or inaccurate, and they are not subject to the same level of scrutiny or approval as the other sources of audit criteria.

A screenshot of a chat Description automatically generated

According to the ISO 9000:2015 document, the seven quality management principles are:

Customer focus

Leadership

Engagement of people

Process approach

Improvement

Evidence-based decision making

Relationship management

For each principle, the document provides a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply the principle in your organization.

Based on the document, here is a possible way to match a potential benefit to each of the four quality management principles you mentioned:

Table

Quality management principle

Potential benefit

Customer focus

Increased revenue and market share

Engagement of people

Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organization

Improvement

Enhanced drive for innovation

Evidence-based decision making

Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 10.2 requires organizations to review nonconformities, including any arising from customer complaints, and to take appropriate actions to determine the cause, implement corrections and preventive actions, and verify their effectiveness. The organization must also monitor the effectiveness of the actions taken and make changes if necessary.

In this scenario, the auditee is facing a legal dispute with a customer over damage to an expensive cashmere coat. This is a nonconformity that arises from customer complaint and has a significant impact on customer satisfaction and reputation. Therefore, clause 10.2 applies to this situation.

The best option for how this should be handled by the Quality Management System is B.

B means that the organization should report the situation to the customer with suggested remedial action. This option follows the principle of transparency and accountability, as well as respecting the customer’s rights and expectations. The organization should also investigate the root cause of the damage and prevent it from happening again in other shops or products.

The other options are not appropriate because:

A means that the organization should settle the court case by negotiation with the customer. This option may not be feasible or satisfactory for both parties, especially if there is a large amount of compensation involved or if there are legal implications for other customers.

C means that the organization should make an offer to replace the coat with a new one. This option may not be sufficient or acceptable for both parties, especially if there is evidence of negligence or poor quality on behalf of the organization.

D means that the organization should give an explanation to the customer of what went wrong. This option may not be enough or convincing for both parties, especially if there is no evidence of negligence or poor quality on behalf of the organization.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.8 (Audit Reporting):

The certification body retains ownership of the audit report as it is responsible for the certification decision.

The auditee may receive a copy, but it does not own the report.

The audit team leader compiles the report but does not own it.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.3 (Roles and Responsibilities of Guides and Observers):

The auditee assigns a guide to assist the audit team.

The guide provides logistical support, helps with navigation, and arranges access to necessary personnel and records.

The audit team leader does not assign the guide, but they may request one.

 A → 8.4.3.a

 B → 7.2.b

 C → 10.2.2

 D → 10.2.1

 E → 6.2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

✅ A. There is no specification for incoming materials → 8.4.3.a

Clause 8.4.3(a) relates to the control of externally provided processes, products, and services, specifically the requirement to communicate appropriate specifications and requirements to suppliers:

“The organization shall ensure the adequacy of requirements prior to their communication to the external provider.”

Failure to specify requirements for incoming materials (e.g., what is acceptable waste plastic) risks compromising product quality.

✅ B. The picking operators have been trained → 7.2.b

Clause 7.2(b) relates to Competence and mandates:

“Ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience.”

Training is a critical part of establishing and maintaining operator competence in quality-affecting tasks.

✅ C. The picked reject materials are not documented → 10.2.2

This clause focuses on the retention of documented information regarding nonconformities and actions taken:

“The organization shall retain documented information as evidence of: the nature of the nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken…”

If rejects are not recorded, traceability and root cause analysis for quality failures are weakened.

✅ D. The rejected materials are segregated → 10.2.1

Clause 10.2.1 relates to nonconformity and corrective action, including containment activities such as:

“Deal with nonconforming outputs in one or more of the following ways: correction; segregation, containment…”

Segregation ensures nonconforming material doesn’t contaminate acceptable output.

✅ E. Management has set an objective for the level of rejects → 6.2

Clause 6.2 is about quality objectives. It requires organizations to:

“Establish quality objectives at relevant functions... The quality objectives shall be measurable…”

Setting a measurable reject-level target aligns with improving process control and reducing waste.

In this scenario, the organization has set a quality objective of achieving a 90% minimum exam pass rate for all courses. The auditor’s task is to assess whether this objective is being monitored effectively and if appropriate actions are taken when the objective is not met.

B. You would determine how the exam pass rate figures were analysed: ISO 9001:2015, particularly Clause 9.1 (Monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation), requires organizations to evaluate performance data. The auditor should verify how the organization analyses the pass rate data to ensure trends are identified, and corrective actions are planned based on this analysis.

D. You would determine what corrective action was being taken to address the low pass rates: When performance falls short of the objective, as seen with Course 4 (where the pass rate is below 90% in all months), Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and corrective action) requires organizations to take corrective actions to address issues. The auditor would need to check if corrective actions have been initiated to address consistently low pass rates.

Statements A, C, E, and F do not directly address the monitoring and corrective action required under ISO 9001:2015 in this context​​.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 10.2.1 defines nonconformity as the non-fulfilment of a requirement. A requirement can be related to the quality management system, the products and services, the customer expectations, or the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Nonconformities can be detected through various sources, such as audits, inspections, tests, customer complaints, or internal reviews. Nonconformities must be addressed by taking appropriate actions to correct them and prevent their recurrence.

In this scenario, the auditee has shown several issues that indicate nonconformities in their quality management system. Two statements that apply to the term nonconformity are:

A. No quality objectives planned for the top management team: According to ISO 9001, clause 6.2.1, the organization must establish quality objectives at relevant functions, levels, and processes. The quality objectives must be consistent with the quality policy and the strategic direction of the organization. The top management team is responsible for providing leadership and direction for the quality management system and ensuring its alignment with the organization’s purpose and context. Therefore, the absence of quality objectives for the top management team is a nonconformity as it violates the requirement of clause 6.2.1.

E. Quality improvements not aligning with the quality policy: According to ISO 9001, clause 5.2.1, the quality policy is a statement of the organization’s intentions and direction regarding quality, as formally expressed by top management. The quality policy must provide a framework for setting quality objectives and be compatible with the context and strategic direction of the organization. The quality policy must also be communicated, understood, and applied within the organization. Therefore, if the quality improvements are not aligned with the quality policy, it is a nonconformity as it violates the requirement of clause 5.2.1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 is based on seven quality management principles, one of which is Relationship Management. This principle emphasizes the importance of maintaining open communication and collaboration with interested parties, including suppliers and customers.

Clause 7.4 (Communication) requires organizations to determine what, when, with whom, and how communication should take place. Since AL-TAX failed to ensure clear communication channels, it did not adhere to this principle. Effective relationship management helps improve supply chain performance, customer satisfaction, and overall QMS effectiveness.

Clause 8.3.4.d of ISO 9001:2015 requires that design and development validation be performed to ensure that the resulting products or services meet the requirements for their specified application or intended use. Validation is critical to confirm that the product works as intended in real-world conditions.

In this case, Noitol omitted the design validation step approximately 50% of the time, which is a direct violation of Clause 8.3.4.d. Although they collect feedback after the fact, this is not a substitute for formal validation before the product is released. The nonconformity arises because the process of validation was neglected, not the recording of improvements or feedback.

Other options, such as documenting improvements (A) or issues with planning verification (B), are important but do not directly address the primary concern: the lack of consistent design validation before product release. Option D (8.6) concerns product release, but this nonconformity focuses on the validation stage, not just approval for release​.

The quality system failed to control the laundry services provided for customers in five shops. The equipment used was not capable of consistently producing the required service.

A first-party audit is an internal audit conducted by auditors who are employed by the organization being audited but who have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited1. The purpose of a first-party audit is to assess the conformity of the organization’s quality management system to the requirements of ISO 9001 and to identify opportunities for improvement2. Therefore, the two auditors who would not participate in a first-party audit are:

•A. An auditor employed by an external consultancy organization: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a customer or supplier of the organization being audited) or a third-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a certification body or registrar).

•F. An auditor from a customer: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit, as a customer is an interested party that has specific requirements for the organization being audited.

The other options are not correct, as they could participate in a first-party audit, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited:

•B. An auditor from an interested party: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as the interested party is within the organization being audited. For example, an auditor from the finance department could audit the production department, as long as they are not involved in the production process or affected by its outcomes.

•C. An auditor trained in-house: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The source of the auditor’s training is not relevant for determining the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•D. An auditor trained in the IRCA scheme: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The IRCA scheme is a professional certification scheme for auditors of management systems, which provides recognition of the auditor’s competence and credibility3. However, being trained in the IRCA scheme does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•E. An auditor certified by IRCA: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. Being certified by IRCA means that the auditor has met the requirements of the IRCA scheme and has demonstrated their competence and credibility as an auditor of management systems3. However, being certified by IRCA does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

ISO/IEC 17021-1 is the standard that specifies requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. It includes provisions for determining audit time for third-party certification audits, ensuring that the audits are conducted in a consistent, comparable, and reliable manner, which can be applied to a variety of management systems, including ISO 9001.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to assess both internal and external issues that could impact the effectiveness of their Quality Management System (QMS).

Clause Reference:

Clause 4.1 – Understanding the Organization and Its Context states that organizations must determine external and internal issues that affect their ability to achieve intended results.

Internal issues include:

Knowledge within the organization (documented or undocumented)

Organizational culture

Resource availability

Technological advancements

Infrastructure and capabilities

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Knowledge (Clause 7.1.6) is a critical internal factor that directly affects the implementation and maintenance of a QMS.

Organizations must identify, maintain, and make available the necessary knowledge to achieve quality objectives and meet customer requirements.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Social and economic environments) → These are considered external issues rather than internal.

B (Competitive environment) → Competition is external, not an internal issue affecting the QMS.

D (Expectations of suppliers) → Supplier expectations relate to external interested parties, covered under Clause 4.2 (Understanding the Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties).

The following table shows the possible matching of the records to the requirements of clause 8.4:

Table

Requirements

Records

Define product requirements

Product specification

Criteria for selection

List of requirements to be met by the external provider

Evaluation of potential external provider

External provider questionnaire

External provider selection

Approved external provider list

Communicate requirements

Purchase order

Monitoring of performance

External provider delivery times and quality issues

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

Define the product requirements that are relevant for the external provision, such as specifications, drawings, standards, codes, etc. These should be documented and communicated to the external provider. A record of the product specification can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently. A record of the list of requirements to be met by the external provider can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed. A record of the external provider questionnaire can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved. A record of the approved external provider list can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely. A record of the purchase order can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed. A record of the external provider delivery times and quality issues can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Before accepting an audit, the certification body must assess the integrity of the auditee and the nature of its operations to ensure compliance feasibility.

Clause References:

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 – Audit Planning:

The certification body must review the auditee’s background, reputation, and operational complexity before accepting the audit.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

The auditee’s integrity and reputation impact the credibility of certification.

The nature of operations determines audit complexity and resource allocation.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Integrity and reputation only) → Correct but incomplete; nature of operations is equally important.

B (Nature of operations only) → Integrity is also a factor, not just operations.

D (No previous major nonconformities required) → Auditees with past major nonconformities can still be audited if corrective actions are taken.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.9 (Corrective Actions) states:

The auditor can set a reasonable deadline for corrective actions.

10 to 60 days is a best practice timeframe for the auditee to respond.

The auditee must propose corrective actions, but the audit team has the authority to set the deadline.

A 7-day deadline (A) is too short, and the audit team—not the auditee—determines the timeframe (B).

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4, an organization is required to control the processes, products and services provided by external providers, including those that affect the quality of the organization’s own products and services. This includes determining the controls to be applied to the external provision of processes, products and services, as well as the information to be communicated to the external providers. The organization is also required to monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of the external providers and retain documented information of these activities.

Therefore, in the scenario given, ABC Ltd is responsible for controlling the processes, products and services provided by Teak Ltd, as they affect the quality of ABC Ltd’s own products and services. This means that ABC Ltd should have established criteria and methods for evaluating the performance of Teak Ltd, as well as documented information of the results of such evaluation. ABC Ltd should also have defined the supply arrangements with Teak Ltd, including the specifications, requirements, and verification activities related to the products and services provided by Teak Ltd.

Hence, the best options to describe how to plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd are A and D, as they are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4. The other options are either irrelevant or beyond the scope of the audit, as they do not pertain to the control of external provision by ABC Ltd.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

An audit’s feasibility must be assessed using multiple factors, not just resource availability.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.3 – Establishing the Audit Program: Requires consideration of logistical, technical, and cooperation factors when assessing audit feasibility.

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.3 – Determining Feasibility of the Audit: Requires evaluating more than just resources to ensure a successful audit.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

Audit feasibility should consider:

Availability of information (documents, records).

Cooperation from the auditee.

Operational conditions that might affect the audit.

Scope and complexity of the QMS being audited.

Resource availability alone is not enough to determine feasibility.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Top management determines feasibility) → Incorrect because feasibility is determined by the certification body, not the auditee.

C (Resources alone are sufficient) → Incorrect because other key factors must be evaluated.

D (Final authority lies with the audit leader) → Incorrect because ISO requires multiple factors to be considered, not just an auditor’s decision.

When conducting a third-party audit to ISO 9001, especially in the context of training and corrective actions taken due to customer complaints, the most appropriate audit trails to follow would be:

A. Ask if customer complaints had ceased since the multi-skilled training finished. This audit trail is relevant because it directly relates to the effectiveness of the corrective action taken. If customer complaints have decreased or ceased, it could indicate that the additional training was effective1.

F. Review records to assess if all planned training has been completed. This trail is important to ensure that the training plan has been fully implemented and to verify that all staff members have received the necessary training. It also helps in assessing the adequacy of the training in terms of content, frequency, and outcomes1.

These two trails, A and F, are closely linked to the issue of customer complaints and the organization’s response to them. They provide insight into whether the actions taken were suitable and whether they have led to improvements in staff performance and customer satisfaction1. The other options, while potentially useful, do not directly address the immediate concern of the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken in response to the customer complaints1.

Establishing the audit programme objectives

Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities

Establishing the audit programme

Initiating the audit

Preparing all audit activity

Conducting the audit activities

To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.

Here is a brief explanation of each stage:

Establishing the audit programme objectives: This is the first stage of the audit process, where the purpose, scope, and criteria of the audit programme are defined. The audit programme objectives should be aligned with the strategic direction and policies of the organization, and should address the needs and expectations of the interested parties12.

Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities: This is the second stage of the audit process, where the factors that can affect the achievement of the audit programme objectives are identified and assessed. The audit programme risks and opportunities should consider the internal and external issues, the requirements and changes of the interested parties, and the results and feedback from previous audits12.

Establishing the audit programme: This is the third stage of the audit process, where the audit programme is designed and implemented. The audit programme should include the audit programme procedures, the audit programme resources, the audit methods and techniques, the audit frequency and schedule, and the audit programme performance indicators12.

Initiating the audit: This is the fourth stage of the audit process, where the audit is prepared and planned. The audit initiation involves selecting the audit team, establishing the contact with the auditee, defining the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, developing the audit plan, and conducting the document review123.

Preparing all audit activity: This is the fifth stage of the audit process, where the audit activities are organized and coordinated. The audit preparation involves assigning the audit tasks, communicating with the auditee and the audit team, arranging the logistics, preparing the working documents, and conducting the opening meeting123.

Conducting the audit activities: This is the sixth and final stage of the audit process, where the audit evidence is collected and evaluated. The audit conduct involves performing the audit activities, such as interviews, observations, document reviews, and tests, documenting the audit findings, preparing the audit conclusions, and conducting the closing meeting123.

I hope this helps you with your ISO 9001 Lead Auditor objectives and content. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. ????

•

Reviews the client’s management system documented information: This activity involves checking the documentation of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team also evaluates the client’s understanding and implementation of the standard, and identifies any gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed before the Stage 2 audit123.

•Reviews the processes with high level of risk: This activity involves assessing the processes that have a significant impact on the quality of the products or services, or that pose a high risk of nonconformity or customer dissatisfaction123. The audit team also verifies the client’s risk management approach, and evaluates the effectiveness of the controls and actions taken to mitigate the risks123.

The other options are not statements that are true for the Stage 1 audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is D and G.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Stage 1 Audit (ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2.2) is a documentation review to assess the readiness for a Stage 2 Audit. The auditor must document:

Observations that could lead to nonconformities, ensuring they are addressed before Stage 2.

Areas needing improvement, such as missing documented information or unclear process definitions.

While understanding the auditee’s main processes is important, documenting interviews is not a requirement at Stage 1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems), Clause 5.3 – Establishing the Audit Objectives

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 – Audit Planning

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Audit objectives must be clearly defined in the audit offer to ensure that the scope, criteria, and purpose are agreed upon in advance.

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (which governs certification bodies) requires that audit objectives be established before the audit begins to ensure transparency and effectiveness.

Sending audit objectives after an agreement has been reached could lead to misalignment between the auditee’s expectations and the audit’s purpose.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Audit objectives should be known only after agreement) → Incorrect because objectives must be pre-defined in the audit offer.

B (Only the auditee should know the objectives) → Incorrect because both the auditor and auditee must align on objectives.

D (Approval from the lead auditor is sufficient) → Incorrect because audit planning follows formal procedures defined by ISO/IEC 17021-1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 7.5.2 (Creating and Updating Documented Information), the criteria for reviewing documented information include:

Content – The accuracy and relevance of the information.

Format – Ensuring readability and proper structuring (e.g., language, versioning).

Procedure for managing documented information – Ensuring control, access, and updates.

Other options, such as internal audit reports and client feedback, are important for overall QMS evaluation but are not the main criteria for reviewing documented information.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to ensure competence of personnel whose work affects quality performance.

Clause References:

Clause 7.2 – Competence: Organizations must determine, provide, and evaluate competence of employees performing work under the QMS.

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 – Audit Evidence: Auditors should use a combination of document review, interviews, and observation to verify competence.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

The organizational chart shows reporting structures and helps verify roles and responsibilities.

Job descriptions outline required qualifications, skills, and competencies for each role.

These documents provide objective audit evidence that personnel meet the required competencies for their positions.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Sufficient evidence) → Partially correct, but competence verification often requires multiple sources of evidence, including training records, certifications, and observations.

B (Not relevant) → Incorrect because verifying competence is crucial for ensuring effective QMS implementation.

D (Direct observation only) → Observation alone is insufficient; documentation and interviews are also required to confirm competence.

Understanding Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015:Clause 6.2 (Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them) specifies that organizations must:

Establish measurable and relevant quality objectives consistent with the quality policy (Clause 6.2.1).

Include objectives applicable to product/service conformity and customer satisfaction.

Document these objectives and their planning as documented information (Clause 6.2.1 & 6.2.2).

Plan how to achieve the objectives, including defining actions, resources, responsibilities, timelines, and methods for evaluation.

Analysis of Options:

A. Quality objectives are not being implemented by the organisation's personnel:Incorrect. While implementation is critical, this relates more to operational aspects rather than the direct requirements of Clause 6.2. Implementation issues would typically raise concerns under Clause 9.1 (Performance Evaluation).

B. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 9001 correctly:Incorrect. The consultant's interpretation of ISO 9001 is irrelevant in terms of Clause 6.2 compliance. The focus is on whether the organization aligns with the requirements, not the consultant's role.

C. Establishing quality objectives did not include top management:Incorrect. While top management involvement is vital for QMS effectiveness (Clause 5.1), this is not a direct requirement of Clause 6.2. Top management alignment is implied but not explicitly mandated for establishing quality objectives.

D. Quality objectives were not established in alignment with the organisation's quality policy:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 requires that quality objectives be consistent with the organization’s quality policy, ensuring they reflect its purpose, strategic direction, and commitment to continual improvement. Misalignment would constitute a nonconformity.

E. The organisation cannot afford to undertake quality objectives all at once:Incorrect. Financial constraints are not directly addressed in Clause 6.2. The clause focuses on planning to achieve objectives, which includes defining the necessary resources but does not demand achieving all objectives simultaneously.

F. Quality objectives are not maintained as documented information:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 specifically requires that quality objectives be maintained as documented information. Failure to document the objectives is a direct violation of this clause.

Why Options D and F Are Correct:

D: Misalignment between the quality objectives and the quality policy directly violates Clause 6.2.1, which mandates that objectives support the strategic direction of the organization.

F: Lack of documentation for quality objectives breaches the requirement to maintain them as documented information under Clause 6.2.1.

Relevant References:

Clause 6.2.1: Establishing quality objectives aligned with the quality policy.

Clause 6.2.2: Maintaining documented information for quality objectives and planning to achieve them.

Clause 5.1.1: Top management's responsibility to ensure alignment between the QMS and strategic direction.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.6.2, a nonconformity is the non-fulfilment of a requirement. A nonconformity can be classified as either major or minor, depending on the nature and extent of the deviation from the audit criteria. A major nonconformity is a nonconformity that affects the ability or the integrity of the organization’s management system to achieve the intended results. A minor nonconformity is a nonconformity that does not affect the ability or the integrity of the organization’s management system to achieve the intended results, but is a deviation from the audit criteria1.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.4.9, the organization is required to analyze the cause and describe the specific correction and corrective actions taken, or planned to be taken, to eliminate detected nonconformities, within a defined time. The organization is also required to provide the certification body with records and evidence of the implementation and effectiveness of the correction and corrective actions taken. The certification body will then verify the correction and corrective actions taken by the organization and decide on the certification status2.

Therefore, the two options of when the organization is required to act in response to reported findings are D and F, as they indicate the presence of nonconformities that need to be corrected and prevented from recurring. The other options are not correct, as they do not require the organization to act in response to reported findings:

•A. A recommendation is given in the report: A recommendation is a suggestion for improvement that is not related to a nonconformity. A recommendation is not binding for the organization and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to accept or reject the recommendation, but it is not required to act on it.

•B. A finding of good practice is reported: A finding of good practice is a positive observation that indicates a strength or a best practice of the organization’s management system. A finding of good practice is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to acknowledge or share the finding of good practice, but it is not required to act on it.

•C. An opportunity for improvement is raised: An opportunity for improvement is a potential area where the organization’s management system can be enhanced or optimized. An opportunity for improvement is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to pursue or ignore the opportunity for improvement, but it is not required to act on it.

•E. A finding of conformity is reported: A finding of conformity is a confirmation that the organization’s management system fulfils the audit criteria. A finding of conformity is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to celebrate or communicate the finding of conformity, but it is not required to act on it.

According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

•Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently.

•Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed.

•Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved.

•Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely.

•Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed.

In this case, the evidence statements that demonstrate a nonconformity with clause 8.4 are A and C, because they show that the organization did not retain documented information of the selection and evaluation of the external provider, and the monitoring of the external provider’s performance. These are requirements of the standard and essential for ensuring the quality of the externally provided processes, products, and services. The other options are not directly related to clause 8.4, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option B may relate to clause 7.1.3 on contingency planning, option D may relate to clause 8.2.3 on review of requirements, option E may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option F may relate to clause 5.1.1 on leadership and commitment. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Scope], Mastering the Scope of ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires collaboration between the auditee (TD Advertising), the certification body, and the audit leader when making changes to audit scope.

Clause References:

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.2.3 – Conducting the Audit: Any change in audit scope must be agreed upon by all parties before proceeding.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

TD cannot unilaterally change the scope without agreement from the certification body and audit leader.

The certification body must ensure the scope remains relevant and that resources are allocated properly.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Anne cannot withdraw) → Incorrect, Anne CAN withdraw if the changes make the audit unfeasible, but she must consult with the certification body first.

B (TD cannot change the scope) → Incorrect, scope changes are allowed but must be formally approved.

D (Anne has full authority to reject scope changes) → Incorrect, scope changes require mutual agreement among all parties.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

During communication with top management, the auditor should discuss:

The quality policy (ISO 9001:2015, Clause 5.2.1), ensuring that it is established, communicated, and understood.

Internal audits (ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2), verifying that they are planned and effectively implemented.

These discussions help assess leadership commitment and the effectiveness of the QMS.

Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

The process by which the accuracy of test equipment is checked against a known standard. = Calibration

The process by which a product or service is visually examined to determine conformity to requirements. = Evaluation

The process by which data is examined in detail to reach a specific answer or answers. = Analysis

The process by which a parameter of a product or service is examined to determine a specific value. = Measurement

According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary, the definitions of the process names are as follows:

Calibration: operation that, under specified conditions, in a first step, establishes a relation between the quantity values with measurement uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second step, uses this information to establish a relation for obtaining a measurement result from an indication.

Evaluation: determination of the suitability, adequacy or effectiveness of an object to achieve established objectives.

Analysis: detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

Measurement: process to experimentally obtain one or more quantity values that can reasonably be attributed to a quantity.

Therefore, the process descriptions can be matched to the process names based on these definitions.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 5.1.2 (Customer Focus) states that top management must ensure customer satisfaction by monitoring customer perceptions.

In scenario 2, top management initiated customer surveys, demonstrating their commitment to customer focus as required by Clause 5.1.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Auditors must have competence in risk-based auditing to effectively assess an organization’s QMS performance and compliance.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 7.2.3 – Determining Auditor Competence:

Auditors must have knowledge of risk-based thinking to assess risk impact on processes.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 0.3.3 – Risk-Based Thinking:

The standard emphasizes proactive risk management, which auditors must understand.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

Risk-based auditing ensures audits focus on high-risk areas, improving audit effectiveness.

Auditors must assess how organizations apply risk-based thinking in decision-making, process control, and improvement.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Industry knowledge) → While helpful, it is not mandatory for all auditors.

C (Expertise in all domains) → Auditors are not required to be experts in all areas, just in audit methodology.

D (Formal degree in quality management) → ISO does not require a formal degree, just competence in audit principles and methods.

Identifying the source of information

Sampling available data

Gathering audit evidence

Verifying objective evidence

Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria

Making audit conclusions

Evaluating against the audit criteria

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4, the process of collecting and verifying information during an audit involves the following steps1:

Identifying the source of information: The audit team should identify the sources of information that are relevant to the audit objectives, scope and criteria. These sources may include documents, records, personnel, processes, activities, facilities, equipment, etc. The audit team should also determine the methods and tools for accessing and collecting the information, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc.

Sampling available data: The audit team should select a representative sample of the available data to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the management system. The sample size and selection method should be based on the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the level of confidence and risk. The audit team should also consider the validity, reliability, relevance and sufficiency of the data.

Gathering audit evidence: The audit team should use the methods and tools identified in the previous step to collect audit evidence, which is the records, statements of fact or other information that are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable. The audit team should record the audit evidence in a clear, concise and objective manner, using notes, checklists, photographs, audio or video recordings, etc.

Verifying objective evidence: The audit team should verify the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the audit evidence collected. This may involve cross-checking different sources of information, confirming the identity and authority of the persons providing the information, examining the original documents or records, etc. The audit team should also identify any discrepancies, inconsistencies or gaps in the audit evidence.

Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria: The audit team should compare the audit evidence with the audit criteria to determine the extent of conformity and nonconformity. The audit team should also identify any opportunities for improvement, best practices, positive aspects or potential risks. The audit team should use professional judgement and apply the principles of auditing when evaluating the audit evidence.

Making audit conclusions: The audit team should consolidate the audit findings and evaluate the overall performance and effectiveness of the management system. The audit team should also consider the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the context and expectations of the auditee and other interested parties. The audit team should provide a clear, concise and objective statement of the audit conclusions, which may include the degree of conformity, the achievement of the intended outcomes, the need for corrective actions, the suitability for certification, etc.

Evaluating against the audit criteria: The audit team should review the audit conclusions and ensure that they are consistent with the audit criteria and supported by sufficient and appropriate audit evidence. The audit team should also ensure that the audit conclusions are communicated to the auditee and other relevant parties in a timely and effective manner, using the agreed audit report format and distribution method.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.7 requires that an organization identify and control any nonconforming outputs that do not conform to the requirements of the customer or other relevant requirements. Nonconforming outputs are any outputs from the process, product or service that do not meet the specified quality criteria. Nonconforming outputs must be dealt with in one or more of the following ways:

Correction of the nonconformity

Segregation, containment, return or suspension of provision of products and services

Informing the customer

Authorisation for acceptance under concession

The organization must also retain documented information on the description of the nonconformity, the actions taken, any concessions obtained, and the identification of the authority deciding the action to resolve the nonconformity.

In this scenario, you have interviewed a line supervisor who is responsible for managing a manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products. The supervisor has explained that these plastic items are rejected at this stage because they do not meet their processing standards and they can damage their machinery and compromise their quality standards. The supervisor has also mentioned that some of these rejected items are melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled.

Based on this information, you can investigate further by taking two actions:

A. Check the process for handling nonconforming items: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for identifying, segregating, containing, returning or suspending provision of nonconforming items at this stage. You can also check whether there is a system for informing customers about any nonconforming items that may affect their satisfaction or expectations.

D. Determine what happens to the waste products: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for disposing of waste products that cannot be recycled as per environmental regulations and customer requirements.

These two actions would help you to determine whether there are any nonconforming outputs at this stage and how they are controlled by the organization.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.5.1 (Certification Decision):

Auditors who conduct the audit cannot be involved in the certification decision to ensure impartiality.

The certification body alone is responsible for making the certification decision based on the audit report and findings.

The audit team leader (Eva) must not take part in the certification decision.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.4 (Audit Records Management) states that the audit schedule must be maintained as a key record.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

In the context of a third-party certification audit, match the roles with the following responsibilities:

Responsibilities:

Conduct the audit to the assigned area.= Auditors

Assist the auditors in identifying personnel to participate in the audit.= Guide

Assign each team member’s responsibility for the audit.= Audit team leader

Respond to questions and provide evidence to the auditor.= Auditee

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 3, the definitions of the roles are as follows1:

Auditors: persons with the competence to conduct an audit

Guide: person appointed by the auditee to assist the audit team

Auditee: organization being audited

Audit team leader: member of an audit team appointed to manage the audit or an audit team

Therefore, the roles can be matched to the responsibilities based on these definitions and the description of the audit process in clause 6 of the standard1.