1z0-1114-25 Questions and Answers

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Redwood supports simple/complex capabilities (A), offers an end-to-end platform (B), and provides a developer-grade UX (C). D, E, and F contradict Redwood’s goals.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

VBS exposes Redwood Templates and Patterns (C) for UI design, Fusion Cloud Apps REST Endpoints (D) for data access, and Redwood UI Components (E) for building interfaces. Fusion Cloud Apps Database Tables (A) are not directly exposed—access is via REST. Action Chains Developed by Oracle (B) are internal and not exposed for modification.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

The Horizontal Foldout template (C) in Redwood mimics Fusion Apps’ foldout layout. JavaScript (A) is unnecessary, and Welcome template (B) doesn’t fit.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Visual Builder Studio, if an AppUI extension is deployed to a Fusion Apps instance by mistake, it can be undeployed using the Environment tab in VBS. This tab allows developers to manage deployments, including removing or rolling back extensions from specific instances (e.g., TEST or PROD). Option A is incorrect because quarterly updates don’t automatically remove extensions—they’re controlled by the developer. Option C is wrong as redeployment via a service request isn’t the standard process; VBS provides self-service tools. Option D is false because VBS supports undeployment, making extensions reversible.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

AppUI extensions use predefined services from the Fusion Apps service catalog (A) for secure data access. Direct URLs (B) and JDBC (C) bypass Oracle’s standards.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In VBS, Fusion Apps page modifications are constrained to Oracle-defined configurable areas (C), ensuring stability, and allow conditional hiding/showing of fields (D) in dynamic forms/tables for flexibility. You cannot remove (A) or edit (B) any component freely—only what Oracle exposes.