Is this correct positioning of AtubaOS-CX switches in the data center?
Solution: Aruba CX 8325 switches are an appropriate choice for leaf switches in a leaf-spine topology that uses Virtual Extensible LAN (VXLAN) with Ethernet VPN (EVPN).
Is this something that NetEdit 2.0 does after it discovers a switch?
Solution: It enables SNMP on the switch, if disabled.
Can you attach this type of ArubaOS-CX interface to a VRF?
Solution: A loopback interface
Two ArubaOS-CX switches ate part of a Virtual Switching Extension (V5X) fabric. Is this a guideline for configuring the switches' link-up delay settings?
Solution: Set the link-up delay timer based on the number of MAC forwarding, ARP, and routing table entries.
Is this a way that Virtual Switching Extension (VSX) differs from Virtual Switching Framework (VSF)?
Solution: VSX features a dual control plane while VSF features a single control plane.
Refer to the exhibit.
You want to enable devices in VRF B and VRF C to reach shared resources in VRF A. is this a valid strategy for meeting this goal?
Solution: Place ad three VRF$ in the same OSPF process on Switch-1.
Is this a rule for configuring schedule profiles on an ArubaOS-CX switch?
Solution: If the profile mixes strict priority scheduling with another scheduling algorithm, the strict priority queue must be the highest numbered queue.
Is this a use case for disabling split-recovery mode on ArubaOS-CX switches in a Virtual Switching Extension (VSX) fabric?
Solution: You are not concerned about split brain Issues in your environment, so you want the secondary member to keep its links up if the ISL falls.
Is this a rule for configuring schedule profiles on an ArubaOS-CX switch?
Solution: With the exception of a single strict priority queue, all queues must use the same scheduling algorithm.
Is this a requirement for implementing Priority Flow Control (PFC) on an ArubaOS-CX switch interface?
Solution: configuring trust of Cos on the interface
Refer to the exhibits.
Is this how the switch-1 handles the traffic?
Solution: A broadcast arrives in VLAN 10 on Switch-1. Switch 1 forwards the frame on all interfaces assigned to VLAN 10, except the incoming interface. It encapsulates the broadcast with VXIAN and sends it to 192.168.1.3, out not 192.168.1.2.
Is this a way that a data center technology can help meet requirements for multi-tenancy?
Solution: Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) enables multiple isolated Layer 3 domains, each with its own routing table, to share a physical network.
Is this statement about ARP and ND Suppression true?
Solution: The switch replies to ARP requests with information present in the local ARP Table when ARP-Suppression is enabled.
You plan to use multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch.
Is this a rule for the setup?
Solution: You cannot leak multicast routes.