What is the correct order of steps for reprocessing critical medical equipment?
Clean, sterilize, disinfect
Disinfect, clean, sterilize
Disinfect, sterilize
Clean, sterilize
The correct answer is D, "Clean, sterilize," as this represents the correct order of steps for reprocessing critical medical equipment. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, critical medical equipment—items that enter sterile tissues or the vascular system (e.g., surgical instruments, implants)—must undergo a rigorous reprocessing cycle to ensure they are free of all microorganisms, including spores. The process begins with cleaning to remove organic material, debris, and soil, which is essential to allow subsequent sterilization to be effective. Sterilization, the final step, uses methods such as steam, ethylene oxide, or hydrogen peroxide gas to achieve a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶, eliminating all microbial life (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment). Disinfection, while important for semi-critical devices, is not a step in the reprocessing of critical items, as it does not achieve the sterility required; it is a separate process for non-critical or semi-critical equipment.
Option A (clean, sterilize, disinfect) is incorrect because disinfecting after sterilization is unnecessary and redundant, as sterilization already achieves a higher level of microbial kill. Option B (disinfect, clean, sterilize) reverses the logical sequence; cleaning must precede any disinfection or sterilization to remove bioburden, and disinfection is not appropriate for critical items. Option C (disinfect, sterilize) omits cleaning and incorrectly prioritizes disinfection, which is insufficient for critical equipment requiring full sterility.
The focus on cleaning followed by sterilization aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on evidence-based reprocessing protocols to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), ensuring that critical equipment is safe for patient use (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.4 - Implement environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols). This sequence is supported by standards such as AAMI ST79, which outlines the mandatory cleaning step before sterilization to ensure efficacy and safety.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competencies 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment, 3.4 - Implement environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols. AAMI ST79:2017, Comprehensive guide to steam sterilization and sterility assurance in health care facilities.
An HBsAb-negative employee has a percutaneous exposure to blood from a Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patient. Which of the following regimens is recommended for this employee?
Immune serum globulin and hepatitis B vaccine
Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) alone
Hepatitis B vaccine alone
Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and hepatitis B vaccine
The correct answer is D, "Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and hepatitis B vaccine," as this is the recommended regimen for an HBsAb-negative employee with a percutaneous exposure to blood from an HBsAg-positive patient. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, which align with recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) exposure depends on the employee’s vaccination status and the source’s HBsAg status. For an unvaccinated or known HBsAb-negative individual (indicating no immunity) exposed to HBsAg-positive blood, the standard PEP includes both HBIG and the hepatitis B vaccine. HBIG provides immediate passive immunity by delivering pre-formed antibodies, while the vaccine initiates active immunity to prevent future infections (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.2 - Implement measures to prevent transmission of infectious agents). The HBIG should be administered within 24 hours of exposure (preferably within 7 days), and the first dose of the vaccine should be given concurrently, followed by the complete vaccine series.
Option A (immune serum globulin and hepatitis B vaccine) is incorrect because immune serum globulin (ISG) is a general immunoglobulin preparation and not specific for HBV; HBIG, which contains high titers of anti-HBs, is the appropriate specific immunoglobulin for HBV exposure. Option B (hepatitis B immune globulin [HBIG] alone) is insufficient, as it provides only temporary passive immunity without initiating long-term active immunity through vaccination, which is critical for an unvaccinated individual. Option C (hepatitis B vaccine alone) is inadequate for immediate post-exposure protection, as it takes weeks to develop immunity, leaving the employee vulnerable in the interim.
The recommendation for HBIG and hepatitis B vaccine aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on evidence-based post-exposure management to prevent HBV transmission in healthcare settings (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.1 - Collaborate with organizational leaders). This dual approach is supported by CDC guidelines, which prioritize rapid intervention to reduce the risk of seroconversion following percutaneous exposure (CDC Updated U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV, 2013).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competencies 3.1 - Collaborate with organizational leaders, 3.2 - Implement measures to prevent transmission of infectious agents. CDC Updated U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV, 2013.
A 17-year-old presents to the Emergency Department with fever, stiff neck, and vomiting. A lumbar puncture is done. The Gram stain shows Gram negative diplocooci. Presumptive identification of the organism is
Haemophilus influenzae
Neisseria meningitidis
Listeria monocytogenes
Streptococcus pneumoniae
The Gram stain showing Gram-negative diplococci in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is characteristic of Neisseria meningitidis, a leading cause of bacterial meningitis in adolescents and young adults.
Step-by-Step Justification:
Gram Stain Interpretation:
Gram-negative diplococci in CSF strongly suggest Neisseria meningitidis.
Classic Symptoms of Meningitis:
Fever, stiff neck, and vomiting are hallmark signs of meningococcal meningitis.
Neisseria meningitidis vs. Other Bacteria:
Haemophilus influenzae (Option A) → Gram-negative coccobacilli.
Listeria monocytogenes (Option C) → Gram-positive rods.
Streptococcus pneumoniae (Option D) → Gram-positive diplococci.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Ready Reference for Microbes, "Neisseria meningitidis and Meningitis".
Given the formula for calculating incidence rates, the Y represents which of the following?
Population served
Number of infected patients
Population at risk
Number of events
Incidence rate is a fundamental epidemiological measure used to quantify the frequency of new cases of a disease within a specified population over a defined time period. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) supports the use of such metrics in the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice" (3rd Edition, 2012). The formula provided, XY×K=Rate\frac{X}{Y} \times K = RateYX×K=Rate, represents the standard incidence rate calculation, where KKK is a constant (e.g., 1,000 or 100,000) to express the rate per unit population, and the question asks what YYY represents among the given options.
In the incidence rate formula, XXX typically represents the number of new cases (or events) of the disease occurring during a specific period, and YYY represents the population at risk during that same period. The ratio XY\frac{X}{Y}YX yields the rate per unit of population, which is then multiplied by KKK to standardize the rate (e.g., cases per 1,000 persons). The CDC defines the denominator (YYY) as the population at risk, which includes individuals susceptible to the disease over the observation period. Option B ("Number of infected patients") might suggest XXX if it specified new cases, but as the denominator YYY, it is incorrect because incidence focuses on new cases relative to the at-risk population, not the total number of infected individuals (which could include prevalent cases). Option C ("Population at risk") correctly aligns with YYY, representing the base population over which the rate is calculated.
Option A, "Population served," is a broader term that might include the total population under care (e.g., in a healthcare facility), but it is not specific to those at risk for new infections, making it less precise. Option D, "Number of events," could align with XXX (new cases or events), but as the denominator YYY, it does not fit the formula’s structure. The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines reinforce that the denominator in incidence rates is the population at risk, ensuring accurate measurement of new disease occurrence.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice, 3rd Edition, 2012.
An infection preventionist is informed that there is a possible cluster of streptococcal meningitis in the neonatal intensive care unit. Which of the following streptococcal serogroops is MOST commonly associated with meningitis in neonates beyond one week of age?
Group A
Group B
Group C
Group D
Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) is the most common cause of neonatal bacterial meningitis beyond one week of age.
Step-by-Step Justification:
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) and Neonatal Infections:
GBS is a leading cause of late-onset neonatal meningitis (occurring after 7 days of age).
Infection typically occurs through vertical transmission from the mother or postnatal exposure.
Neonatal Risk Factors:
Premature birth, prolonged rupture of membranes, and maternal GBS colonization increase risk.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Group A: Rare in neonates and more commonly associated with pharyngitis and skin infections.
C. Group C: Typically associated with animal infections and rarely affects humans.
D. Group D: Includes Enterococcus, which can cause neonatal infections but is not the most common cause of meningitis.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Text, "Group B Streptococcus and Neonatal Meningitis".
Healthcare workers are MOST likely to benefit from infection prevention education if the Infection Preventionist (IP)
brings in speakers who are recognized experts.
plans the educational program well ahead of time.
audits practices and identifies deficiencies.
involves the staff in determining the content.
The correct answer is D, "involves the staff in determining the content," as this approach is most likely to benefit healthcare workers from infection prevention education. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, effective education programs are tailored to the specific needs and contexts of the learners. Involving staff in determining the content ensures that the educational material addresses their real-world challenges, knowledge gaps, and interests, thereby increasing engagement, relevance, and application of the learned principles (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competency 4.1 - Develop and implement educational programs). This participatory approach fosters ownership and accountability among healthcare workers, enhancing the likelihood that they will adopt and sustain infection prevention practices.
Option A (brings in speakers who are recognized experts) can enhance credibility and provide high-quality information, but it does not guarantee that the content will meet the specific needs of the staff unless their input is considered. Option B (plans the educational program well ahead of time) is important for logistical success and preparedness, but without staff involvement, the program may lack relevance or fail to address immediate concerns. Option C (audits practices and identifies deficiencies) is a valuable step in identifying areas for improvement, but it is a diagnostic process rather than a direct educational strategy; education based solely on audits might not engage staff effectively if their input is not sought.
The focus on involving staff aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on adult learning principles, which highlight the importance of learner-centered education. By involving staff, the IP adheres to best practices for adult education, ensuring that the program is practical and tailored, ultimately leading to better outcomes in infection prevention (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competency 4.2 - Evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs). This approach also supports a collaborative culture, which is critical for sustaining infection control efforts in healthcare settings.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competencies 4.1 - Develop and implement educational programs, 4.2 - Evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs.
Which of the following represents the most effective strategy for preventing Clostridioides difficile transmission in a healthcare facility?
Daily environmental cleaning with quaternary ammonium compounds.
Strict antimicrobial stewardship to limit unnecessary antibiotic use.
Universal C. difficile screening on admission for high-risk patients.
Routine use of alcohol-based hand rub for hand hygiene after patient contact.
Antimicrobial stewardship is the most effective strategy to reduce C. difficile infections (CDI) by limiting the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Quaternary ammonium disinfectants (A) are ineffective against C. difficile spores; bleach-based disinfectants are preferred.
Routine screening (C) is not cost-effective for prevention.
Alcohol-based hand rubs (D) do not kill C. difficile spores; soap and water should be used.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Text, "C. difficile Prevention Strategies," Chapter 9.
Which of the following community-acquired infections has the greatest potential public health impact?
Cryptosporidium enteritis
Fifth disease (parvovirus B-19)
Clostridial myositis (gas gangrene)
Cryptococcal meningitis
The correct answer is A, "Cryptosporidium enteritis," as it has the greatest potential public health impact among the listed community-acquired infections. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, the public health impact of an infection is determined by factors such as its transmissibility, severity, population at risk, and potential for outbreaks. Cryptosporidium enteritis, caused by the protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium, is a waterborne illness that spreads through contaminated water or food, leading to severe diarrhea, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. Its significant public health impact stems from its high transmissibility in community settings (e.g., via recreational water or daycare centers), the difficulty in eradicating the oocysts with standard chlorination, and the potential to cause large-scale outbreaks affecting vulnerable populations, such as children or the elderly (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I: Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competency 1.3 - Apply principles of epidemiology). This is exemplified by notable outbreaks, such as the 1993 Milwaukee outbreak affecting over 400,000 people.
Option B (Fifth disease, caused by parvovirus B-19) is a viral infection primarily affecting children, causing a mild rash and flu-like symptoms. While it can pose risks to pregnant women (e.g., fetal anemia), it is generally self-limiting and has limited community-wide transmission potential, reducing its public health impact. Option C (clostridial myositis, or gas gangrene, caused by Clostridium perfringens) is a severe but rare infection typically associated with traumatic wounds or surgery, with limited person-to-person spread, making its public health impact low due to its sporadic nature. Option D (cryptococcal meningitis, caused by Cryptococcus neoformans) primarily affects immunocompromised individuals (e.g., those with HIV/AIDS) and is not highly transmissible in the general community, confining its impact to specific at-risk groups rather than the broader population.
The selection of Cryptosporidium enteritis aligns with CBIC’s focus on identifying infections with significant epidemiological implications, enabling infection preventionists to prioritize surveillance and control measures for diseases with high outbreak potential (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.1 - Conduct surveillance for healthcare-associated infections and epidemiologically significant organisms). This is supported by CDC data highlighting waterborne pathogens as major public health concerns (CDC Parasites - Cryptosporidium, 2023).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I: Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competency 1.3 - Apply principles of epidemiology; Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.1 - Conduct surveillance for healthcare-associated infections and epidemiologically significant organisms. CDC Parasites - Cryptosporidium, 2023.
A hospital is experiencing an increase in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections in the hematology-oncology unit. Which of the following interventions is MOST effective in halting the spread of VRE in this high-risk setting?
Screening all patients on admission and placing positive patients in isolation.
Restricting the use of vancomycin for all patients in the hospital.
Implementing a hand hygiene compliance audit and feedback system.
Conducting environmental sampling for VRE contamination weekly.
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Hand hygiene remains the single most effective intervention to prevent the spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in healthcare settings. Implementing an audit and feedback system significantly improves compliance and reduces VRE transmission.
Step-by-Step Justification:
Hand Hygiene Compliance Audit and Feedback (Best Strategy)
Studies show that poor hand hygiene is the primary mode of VRE transmission in hospitals.
Implementing real-time auditing with feedback ensures sustained compliance and helps identify weak areas.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Screening all patients and isolating VRE-positive patients:
While screening helps identify carriers, contact precautions alone are not sufficient without strong hand hygiene enforcement.
B. Restricting vancomycin use:
While antimicrobial stewardship is crucial, vancomycin use alone does not drive VRE outbreaks—poor infection control practices do.
D. Conducting environmental sampling weekly:
Routine sampling is not necessary; immediate terminal disinfection and improved hand hygiene are more effective.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Text, "VRE Prevention and Hand Hygiene," Chapter 11.
APIC-JCR Workbook, "Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control Measures," Chapter 7.
When developing an exposure control plan, the MOST important aspect in the prevention of exposure to tuberculosis is:
Placement of the patient in an airborne infection isolation room.
Identification of a potentially infectious patient.
Prompt initiation of chemotherapeutic agents.
Use of personal protective equipment.
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is an airborne disease that poses a significant risk in healthcare settings, particularly through exposure to infectious droplets. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes the "Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases" domain, which includes developing exposure control plans, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Healthcare Settings" (2005). The question seeks the most important aspect of an exposure control plan to prevent TB exposure, requiring a prioritization of preventive strategies.
Option B, "Identification of a potentially infectious patient," is the most important aspect. Early identification of individuals with suspected or confirmed TB (e.g., through symptom screening like persistent cough, fever, or weight loss, or diagnostic tests like chest X-rays and sputum smears) allows for timely isolation and treatment, preventing further transmission. The CDC guidelines stress that the first step in an exposure control plan is to recognize patients with signs or risk factors for infectious TB, as unrecognized cases are the primary source of healthcare worker and patient exposures. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) also mandates risk assessment and early detection as foundational to TB control plans.
Option A, "Placement of the patient in an airborne infection isolation room," is a critical control measure once a potentially infectious patient is identified. Airborne infection isolation rooms (AIIRs) with negative pressure ventilation reduce the spread of infectious droplets, as recommended by the CDC. However, this step depends on prior identification; placing a patient in an AIIR without knowing their infectious status is inefficient and not the initial priority. Option C, "Prompt initiation of chemotherapeutic agents," is essential for treating active TB and reducing infectiousness, typically within days of effective therapy, per CDC guidelines. However, this follows identification and diagnosis (e.g., via acid-fast bacilli smear or culture), making it a secondary action rather than the most important preventive aspect. Option D, "Use of personal protective equipment," such as N95 respirators, is a key protective measure for healthcare workers once an infectious patient is identified, as outlined by the CDC and OSHA. However, PPE is a reactive measure that mitigates exposure after identification and isolation, not the foundational step to prevent it.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines prioritize early identification as the cornerstone of TB exposure prevention, enabling all subsequent interventions. Option B ensures that the exposure control plan addresses the source of transmission at its outset, making it the most important aspect.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Healthcare Settings, 2005.
OSHA Respiratory Protection Standard, 29 CFR 1910.134.
Which performance improvement model should the infection preventionist use to aid in the evaluation of the infection control plan?
Six Sigma
Failure mode and effects analysis
Plan, Do, Study, Act
Root Cause Analysis
The Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) model is a widely used performance improvement tool in infection prevention. It focuses on continuous quality improvement through planning, implementing, analyzing data, and making adjustments. This model aligns with infection control program evaluations and The Joint Commission’s infection prevention and control standards.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
A. Six Sigma – A data-driven process improvement method but not as commonly used in infection control as PDSA.
B. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) – Used to identify risks before implementation, rather than ongoing evaluation.
D. Root Cause Analysis (RCA) – Used to analyze failures after they occur, rather than guiding continuous improvement.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
The PDSA cycle is a recognized model for evaluating and improving infection control plans.
Which of the following measures has NOT been demonstrated to reduce the risk of surgical site infections?
Limiting the duration of preoperative hospital stay
Using antimicrobial preoperative scrub by members of the surgical team
Assuring adequate patient nutrition
Designating a specific surgical suite tor infected cases
There is no strong evidence that isolating infected cases in a separate surgical suite reduces SSI risk.
Step-by-Step Justification:
SSI Prevention Strategies Supported by Evidence:
Preoperative hospital stay limitation reduces exposure to hospital-acquired pathogens.
Antimicrobial preoperative scrubs lower bacterial load on the skin.
Adequate nutrition improves immune function and wound healing.
Why Designating a Separate Surgical Suite Is Not Effective:
Operating room environmental controls (e.g., laminar airflow, sterilization protocols) are more important than suite designation.
No significant reduction in SSIs has been observed by segregating infected cases into specific OR suites.
Why Other Options Are Correct:
A. Limiting preoperative hospital stay: Reduces nosocomial bacterial exposure.
B. Antimicrobial preoperative scrub: Decreases skin flora contamination.
C. Assuring adequate patient nutrition: Enhances immune defense against infections.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Text, "Surgical Site Infection Prevention Strategies".
A healthcare worker experiences a percutaneous exposure to a patient with untreated HIV. The next step is to:
Initiate HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) within 2 hours.
Wait for HIV test results before starting treatment.
Offer post-exposure prophylaxis only if symptoms develop.
Retest for HIV after 6 months before deciding on PEP.
HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) should be initiated within 2 hours to be most effective.
Waiting for results (B) delays critical treatment.
PEP should always be offered after high-risk exposure, not only if symptoms develop (C).
Retesting after 6 months (D) is recommended but should not delay PEP initiation.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Text, "Bloodborne Pathogens and PEP," Chapter 11.
The annual report for Infection Prevention shows a dramatic decrease in urinary catheter days, a decrease in the catheter utilization ratio, and a slight decrease in the number of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). The report does not show an increase in the overall rate of CAUTI. How would the infection preventionist explain this to the administration?
The rate is incorrect and needs to be recalculated.
The rate may be higher if the denominator is very small.
The rate is not affected by the number of catheter days.
Decreasing catheter days will not have an effect on decreasing CAUTI.
The correct answer is B, "The rate may be higher if the denominator is very small," as this provides the most plausible explanation for the observed data in the annual report. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, the CAUTI rate is calculated as the number of CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter days, where catheter days serve as the denominator. The report indicates a dramatic decrease in urinary catheter days and a slight decrease in the number of CAUTIs, yet the overall CAUTI rate has not increased. This discrepancy can occur if the denominator (catheter days) becomes very small, which can inflate or destabilize the rate, potentially masking an actual increase in the infection risk per catheter day (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.2 - Analyze surveillance data). A smaller denominator amplifies the impact of even a slight change in the number of infections, suggesting that the rate may be higher than expected or less reliable, necessitating further investigation.
Option A (the rate is incorrect and needs to be recalculated) assumes an error in the calculation without evidence, which is less specific than the denominator effect explanation. Option C (the rate is not affected by the number of catheter days) is incorrect because the CAUTI rate is directly influenced by the number of catheter days as the denominator; a decrease in catheter days should typically lower the rate if infections decrease proportionally, but the lack of an increase here suggests a calculation or interpretation issue. Option D (decreasing catheter days will not have an effect on decreasing CAUTI) contradicts evidence-based practice, as reducing catheter days is a proven strategy to lower CAUTI incidence, though the rate’s stability here indicates a potential statistical artifact.
The explanation focusing on the denominator aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on accurate surveillance and data analysis to guide infection prevention strategies, allowing the infection preventionist to advise administration on the need to review data trends or adjust monitoring methods (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.5 - Use data to guide infection prevention and control strategies). This insight can prompt a deeper analysis to ensure the CAUTI rate reflects true infection risk.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competencies 2.2 - Analyze surveillance data, 2.5 - Use data to guide infection prevention and control strategies.
A patient with pertussis can be removed from Droplet Precautions after
direct fluorescent antibody and/or culture are negative.
five days of appropriate antibiotic therapy.
the patient has been given pertussis vaccine.
the paroxysmal stage has ended.
A patient with pertussis (whooping cough) should remain on Droplet Precautions to prevent transmission. According to APIC guidelines, patients with pertussis can be removed from Droplet Precautions after completing at least five days of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and showing clinical improvement.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
A. Direct fluorescent antibody and/or culture are negative – Laboratory results may not always detect pertussis early, and false negatives can occur.
C. The patient has been given pertussis vaccine – The vaccine prevents but does not treat pertussis, and it does not shorten the period of contagiousness.
D. The paroxysmal stage has ended – The paroxysmal stage (severe coughing fits) can last weeks, but infectiousness decreases with antibiotics.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
According to APIC guidelines, Droplet Precautions should continue until the patient has received at least five days of antimicrobial therapy.
What rate is expressed by the number of patients who acquire infections over a specified time period divided by the population at risk of acquiring an infection during that time period?
Incidence rate
Disease specific
Point prevalence
Period prevalence
The incidence rate measures new cases of infection in a population over a defined time period using the formula:
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
B. Disease specific – Refers to infections caused by a particular pathogen, not the general rate of new infections.
C. Point prevalence – Measures existing cases at a specific point in time, not new cases.
D. Period prevalence – Includes both old and new cases over a set period, unlike incidence, which only considers new cases.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
APIC defines incidence rate as the number of new infections in a population over a given period.
After defining and identifying cases in a possible cluster of infections, an infection preventionist should NEXT establish:
The route of transmission.
An appropriate control group.
A hypothesis that will explain the majority of cases.
Whether observed incidence exceeds expected incidence.
When investigating a possible cluster of infections, an infection preventionist (IP) follows a structured epidemiological approach to identify the cause and implement control measures. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) outlines this process within the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain, which aligns with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for outbreak investigation. The steps typically include defining and identifying cases, formulating a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, and implementing control measures. The question specifies the next step after defining and identifying cases, requiring an evaluation of the logical sequence.
Option C, "A hypothesis that will explain the majority of cases," is the next critical step. After confirming a cluster through case definition and identification (e.g., by time, place, and person), the IP should develop a working hypothesis to explain the observed pattern. This hypothesis might propose a common source (e.g., contaminated equipment), a mode of transmission (e.g., airborne), or a specific population at risk. The CDC’s "Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice" (3rd Edition, 2012) emphasizes that formulating a hypothesis is essential to guide further investigation, such as identifying risk factors or environmental sources. This step allows the IP to focus resources on testing the most plausible explanation before proceeding to detailed analysis or interventions.
Option A, "The route of transmission," is an important element of the investigation but typically follows hypothesis formulation. Determining the route (e.g., contact, droplet, or common vehicle) requires data collection and analysis to test the hypothesis, making it a subsequent step rather than the immediate next action. Option B, "An appropriate control group," is relevant for analytical studies (e.g., case-control studies) to compare exposed versus unexposed individuals, but this is part of hypothesis testing, which occurs after the hypothesis is established. Selecting a control group prematurely, without a hypothesis, lacks direction and efficiency. Option D, "Whether observed incidence exceeds expected incidence," is a preliminary step to define a cluster, often done during case identification using baseline data or statistical thresholds (e.g., exceeding the mean plus two standard deviations). Since the question assumes cases are already defined and identified, this step is complete, and the focus shifts to hypothesis development.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines prioritize hypothesis formulation as the logical next step after case identification, enabling a targeted investigation. This approach ensures that the IP can efficiently address the cluster’s cause, making Option C the correct answer.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice, 3rd Edition, 2012.
What should an infection preventionist prioritize when designing education programs?
Marketing research
Departmental budgets
Prior healthcare experiences
Learning and behavioral science theories
The correct answer is D, "Learning and behavioral science theories," as this is what an infection preventionist (IP) should prioritize when designing education programs. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, effective education programs in infection prevention and control are grounded in evidence-based learning theories and behavioral science principles. These theories, such as adult learning theory (andragogy), social learning theory, and the health belief model, provide a framework for understanding how individuals acquire knowledge, develop skills, and adopt behaviors (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competency 4.1 - Develop and implement educational programs). Prioritizing these theories ensures that educational content is tailored to the learners’ needs, enhances engagement, and promotes sustained behavior change—such as adherence to hand hygiene or proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE)—which are critical for reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).
Option A (marketing research) is more relevant to commercial strategies and audience targeting outside the healthcare education context, making it less applicable to the IP’s role in designing clinical education programs. Option B (departmental budgets) is an important logistical consideration for resource allocation, but it is secondary to the design process; financial constraints should influence implementation rather than the foundational design based on learning principles. Option C (prior healthcare experiences) can inform the customization of content by identifying learners’ backgrounds, but it is not the primary priority; it should be assessed within the context of applying learning and behavioral theories to address those experiences effectively.
The focus on learning and behavioral science theories aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on developing and evaluating educational programs that drive measurable improvements in infection control practices (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competency 4.2 - Evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs). By prioritizing these theories, the IP can create programs that are scientifically sound, learner-centered, and impactful, ultimately enhancing patient and staff safety.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competencies 4.1 - Develop and implement educational programs, 4.2 - Evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs.
A nurse exposed to pertussis develops a mild cough 14 days later. What is the recommended action?
Continue working with a surgical mask.
Exclude from patient care until five days after starting antibiotics.
Initiate post-exposure prophylaxis only if symptoms worsen.
Conduct serologic testing before deciding on work restrictions.
The CDC recommends exclusion of healthcare workers with pertussis until completing at least five days of antibiotic therapy.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC-JCR Workbook, "Occupational Health Considerations," Chapter 10
Following recent renovations on an oncology unit, three patients were identified with Aspergillus infections. The infections were thought to be facility-acquired. Appropriate environmental microbiological monitoring would be to culture the:
Air
Ice
Carpet
Aerators
The scenario describes an outbreak of Aspergillus infections among three patients on an oncology unit following recent renovations, with the infections suspected to be facility-acquired. Aspergillus is a mold commonly associated with environmental sources, particularly airborne spores, and its presence in immunocompromised patients (e.g., oncology patients) poses a significant risk. The infection preventionist must identify the appropriate environmental microbiological monitoring strategy, guided by the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) and CDC recommendations. Let’s evaluate each option:
A. Air: Aspergillus species are ubiquitous molds that thrive in soil, decaying vegetation, and construction dust, and they are primarily transmitted via airborne spores. Renovations can disturb these spores, leading to aerosolization and inhalation by vulnerable patients. Culturing the air using methods such as settle plates, air samplers, or high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration monitoring is a standard practice to detect Aspergillus during construction or post-renovation in healthcare settings, especially oncology units where patients are at high risk for invasive aspergillosis. This aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on environmental monitoring for airborne pathogens, making it the most appropriate choice.
B. Ice: Ice can be a source of contamination with bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas, Legionella) or other pathogens if improperly handled or stored, but it is not a typical reservoir for Aspergillus, which is a mold requiring organic material and moisture for growth. While ice safety is important in infection control, culturing ice is irrelevant to an Aspergillus outbreak linked to renovations and is not a priority in this context.
C. Carpet: Carpets can harbor dust, mold, and other microorganisms, especially in high-traffic or poorly maintained areas. Aspergillus spores could theoretically settle in carpet during renovations, but carpets are not a primary source of airborne transmission unless disturbed (e.g., vacuuming). Culturing carpet might be a secondary step if air sampling indicates widespread contamination, but it is less direct and less commonly recommended as the initial monitoring site compared to air sampling.
D. Aerators: Aerators (e.g., faucet aerators) can harbor waterborne pathogens like Pseudomonas or Legionella due to biofilm formation, but Aspergillus is not typically associated with water systems unless there is significant organic contamination or aerosolization from water sources (e.g., cooling towers). Culturing aerators is relevant for waterborne outbreaks, not for an Aspergillus outbreak linked to renovations, making this option inappropriate.
The best answer is A, culturing the air, as Aspergillus is an airborne pathogen, and renovations are a known risk factor for spore dispersal in healthcare settings. This monitoring strategy allows the infection preventionist to confirm the source, assess the extent of contamination, and implement control measures (e.g., enhanced filtration, construction barriers) to protect patients. This is consistent with CBIC and CDC guidelines for managing fungal outbreaks in high-risk units.
References:
CBIC Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Core Competency Model (updated 2023), Domain IV: Environment of Care, which recommends air sampling for Aspergillus during construction-related outbreaks.
CBIC Examination Content Outline, Domain III: Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases, which includes environmental monitoring for facility-acquired infections.
CDC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Healthcare Facilities (2022), which advocate air culturing to detect Aspergillus post-renovation in immunocompromised patient areas.
Which of the following is an essential element of practice when sending biohazardous samples from one location to another?
Ship using triple-containment packaging
Electronically log and send via overnight delivery
Transport by an authorized biohazard transporter
Store in a cooler that is labeled as a health hazard
The safe transport of biohazardous samples, such as infectious agents, clinical specimens, or diagnostic materials, is a critical aspect of infection prevention and control to prevent exposure and environmental contamination. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes adherence to regulatory and safety standards in the "Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases" domain, which includes proper handling and shipping of biohazardous materials. The primary guideline governing this practice is the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations, which align with global biosafety standards.
Option A, "Ship using triple-containment packaging," is the essential element of practice. Triple-containment packaging involves three layers: a primary watertight container holding the sample, a secondary leak-proof container with absorbent material, and an outer rigid packaging (e.g., a box) that meets shipping regulations. This system ensures that biohazardous materials remain secure during transport, preventing leaks or breaches that could expose handlers or the public. The CDC and WHO endorse this method as a fundamental requirement for shipping Category A (high-risk) and Category B (moderate-risk) infectious substances, making it the cornerstone of safe transport practice.
Option B, "Electronically log and send via overnight delivery," is a useful administrative and logistical step to track shipments and ensure timely delivery, but it is not the essential element. While documentation and rapid delivery are important for maintaining chain of custody and sample integrity, they are secondary to the physical containment provided by triple packaging. Option C, "Transport by an authorized biohazard transporter," is a necessary step to comply with regulations, as only trained and certified transporters can handle biohazardous materials. However, this is contingent on proper packaging; without triple containment, transport authorization alone is insufficient. Option D, "Store in a cooler that is labeled as a health hazard," may be part of preparation (e.g., maintaining sample temperature), but labeling alone does not address the containment or transport safety required during shipment. Coolers are often used, but the focus on labeling as a health hazard is incomplete without the triple-containment structure.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) supports compliance with federal and international shipping regulations, which prioritize triple-containment packaging as the foundational practice to mitigate risks. The CDC’s Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL, 6th Edition, 2020) and IATA guidelines further specify that triple packaging is mandatory for all biohazardous shipments, reinforcing Option A as the correct answer.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL), 6th Edition, 2020.
U.S. DOT Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR Parts 171-180).
IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations, 2023.
Hand hygiene rates in the facility have been decreasing over time. The Infection Preventionist (IP) surveys staff and finds that hand dryness is the major reason for non-compliance. What step should the IP take?
Provide staff lotion in every patient room.
Provide a compatible lotion in a convenient location.
Allow staff to bring in lotion and carry it in their pockets.
Allow staff to bring in lotion for use at the nurses’ station and lounge.
Hand hygiene is a cornerstone of infection prevention, and declining compliance rates pose a significant risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes improving hand hygiene adherence in the "Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases" domain, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings" (2002). The IP’s survey identifies hand dryness as the primary barrier, likely due to the frequent use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers or soap, which can dehydrate skin. The goal is to address this barrier effectively while maintaining infection control standards.
Option B, "Provide a compatible lotion in a convenient location," is the most appropriate step. The CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) recommend using moisturizers to mitigate skin irritation and dryness, which can improve hand hygiene compliance. However, the lotion must be compatible with alcohol-based hand rubs (e.g., free of petroleum-based products that can reduce sanitizer efficacy) and placed in accessible areas (e.g., near sinks or sanitizer dispensers) to encourage use without disrupting workflow. The WHO’s "Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care" (2009) suggest providing skin care products as part of a multimodal strategy to enhance adherence, making this a proactive, facility-supported solution that addresses the root cause.
Option A, "Provide staff lotion in every patient room," is a good intention but impractical and potentially risky. Placing lotion in patient rooms could lead to inconsistent use, contamination (e.g., from patient contact), or misuse (e.g., staff applying incompatible products), compromising infection control. The CDC advises against uncontrolled lotion distribution in patient care areas. Option C, "Allow staff to bring in lotion and carry it in their pockets," introduces variability in product quality and compatibility. Personal lotions may contain ingredients (e.g., oils) that inactivate alcohol-based sanitizers, and pocket storage increases the risk of contamination or cross-contamination, which the CDC cautions against. Option D, "Allow staff to bring in lotion for use at the nurses’ station and lounge," limits the intervention to non-patient care areas, reducing its impact on hand hygiene during patient interactions. It also shares the compatibility and contamination risks of Option C, making it less effective.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines emphasize evidence-based interventions, such as providing approved skin care products in strategic locations to boost compliance. Option B balances accessibility, safety, and compatibility, making it the best step to address hand dryness and improve hand hygiene rates.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, 2002.
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, 2009.
Which of the following strategies is MOST effective in reducing surgical site infections (SSI) in orthopedic procedures?
Perioperative normothermia maintenance.
Routine intraoperative wound irrigation with povidone-iodine.
Administration of prophylactic antibiotics postoperatively for 48 hours.
Use of sterile adhesive wound dressings for 10 days postoperatively.
Perioperative normothermia maintenance reduces SSI rates by improving immune function and tissue perfusion.
Routine wound irrigation (B) has no strong evidence supporting SSI prevention.
Prolonged antibiotic use (C) increases antibiotic resistance without added benefit.
Extended use of wound dressings (D) does not reduce SSI rates.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC Text, "SSI Prevention in Surgery," Chapter 12.
Which of the following microorganisms does NOT cause gastroenteritis in humans?
Norovirus
Rhinovirus
Rotavirus
Coxsackievirus
Gastroenteritis, characterized by inflammation of the stomach and intestines, typically presents with symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes the identification of infectious agents in the "Identification of Infectious Disease Processes" domain, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines on foodborne and enteric diseases. The question requires identifying the microorganism among the options that does not cause gastroenteritis, necessitating an evaluation of each pathogen’s clinical associations.
Option B, "Rhinovirus," is the correct answer as it does not cause gastroenteritis. Rhinoviruses are the primary cause of the common cold, affecting the upper respiratory tract and leading to symptoms like runny nose, sore throat, and cough. The CDC and WHO classify rhinoviruses as picornaviruses that replicate in the nasopharynx, with no significant evidence linking them to gastrointestinal illness in humans. Their transmission is primarily through respiratory droplets, not the fecal-oral route associated with gastroenteritis.
Option A, "Norovirus," is a well-known cause of gastroenteritis, often responsible for outbreaks of acute vomiting and diarrhea, particularly in closed settings like cruise ships or nursing homes. The CDC identifies norovirus as the leading cause of foodborne illness in the U.S., transmitted via the fecal-oral route. Option C, "Rotavirus," is a major cause of severe diarrheal disease in infants and young children worldwide, also transmitted fecal-orally, with the CDC noting its significance before widespread vaccination reduced its impact. Option D, "Coxsackievirus," a member of the enterovirus genus, can cause gastroenteritis, particularly in children, alongside other syndromes like hand-foot-mouth disease. The CDC and clinical literature (e.g., Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases) document its gastrointestinal involvement, though it is less common than norovirus or rotavirus.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines on enteric pathogens underscore the importance of distinguishing between respiratory and gastrointestinal pathogens for effective infection control. Rhinovirus’s exclusive association with respiratory illness makes Option B the microorganism that does not cause gastroenteritis.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Norovirus Fact Sheet, 2021.
CDC Rotavirus Vaccination Information, 2020.
Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 9th Edition, 2019.
There has been an outbreak of foodborne illness in the community believed to be associated with attendance at a church festival. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate denominator for calculation of the attack rate?
People admitted to hospitals with gastrointestinal symptoms
Admission tickets sold to the festival
Dinners served at the festival
Residents in the county who attended the festival
The attack rate, a key epidemiological measure in outbreak investigations, is defined as the proportion of individuals who become ill after exposure to a suspected source, calculated as the number of cases divided by the population at risk. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes accurate outbreak analysis in the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice" (3rd Edition, 2012). The question involves a foodborne illness outbreak linked to a church festival, requiring the selection of the most appropriate denominator to reflect the population at risk.
Option D, "Residents in the county who attended the festival," is the most appropriate denominator. The attack rate should be based on the total number of people exposed to the potential source of the outbreak (i.e., the festival), as this represents the population at risk for developing the foodborne illness. The CDC guidelines for foodborne outbreak investigations recommend using the number of attendees or participants as the denominator when the exposure is tied to a specific event, such as a festival. This approach accounts for all individuals who had the opportunity to consume the implicated food, providing a comprehensive measure of risk. Obtaining an accurate count of attendees may involve festival records, surveys, or estimates, but it directly reflects the exposed population.
Option A, "People admitted to hospitals with gastrointestinal symptoms," is incorrect as a denominator. This represents the number of cases (the numerator), not the total population at risk. Using cases as the denominator would invalidate the attack rate calculation, which requires a distinct population base. Option B, "Admission tickets sold to the festival," could serve as a proxy for attendees if all ticket holders attended, but it may overestimate the at-risk population if some ticket holders did not participate or underestimate it if additional guests attended without tickets. The CDC advises using actual attendance data when available, making this less precise than Option D. Option C, "Dinners served at the festival," is a potential exposure-specific denominator if the illness is linked to a particular meal. However, without confirmation that all cases are tied to a single dinner event (e.g., a specific food item), this is too narrow and may exclude attendees who ate other foods or did not eat but were exposed (e.g., via cross-contamination), making it less appropriate than the broader attendee count.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines stress the importance of defining the exposed population accurately for attack rate calculations in foodborne outbreaks. Option D best captures the population at risk associated with festival attendance, making it the most appropriate denominator.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice, 3rd Edition, 2012.
CDC Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response, 2017.
Which of the following options describes a correct use of personal protective equipment?
Personal eyeglasses should be worn during suctioning.
Surgical masks should be worn during lumbar puncture procedures.
Gloves should be worn when handling or touching a cardiac monitor that has been disinfected.
Eye protection should be worn when providing patient care it at risk of spreading respiratory disease after unprotected exposure.
According to CDC and APIC guidelines, a surgical mask is required when performing lumbar punctures to prevent bacterial contamination (e.g., meningitis caused by droplet transmission of oral flora).
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
A. Personal eyeglasses should be worn during suctioning – Incorrect because eyeglasses do not provide adequate eye protection. Goggles or face shields should be used.
C. Gloves should be worn when handling or touching a cardiac monitor that has been disinfected – Not necessary unless recontamination is suspected.
D. Eye protection should be worn when providing patient care after unprotected exposure – Eye protection should be used before exposure, not just after.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
APIC states that surgical masks must be worn for procedures such as lumbar puncture to reduce infection risk.
An infection preventionist is evaluating a new catheter that may decrease the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Which of the following provides the BEST information to support the selection of this catheter?
Staff member preference and product availability
Product materials and vendor information
Value analysis and information provided by the manufacturer
Cost benefit analysis and safety considerations
The correct answer is D, "Cost benefit analysis and safety considerations," as this provides the best information to support the selection of a new catheter aimed at decreasing the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, selecting medical devices like catheters for infection prevention involves a comprehensive evaluation that balances efficacy, safety, and economic impact. A cost-benefit analysis assesses the financial implications (e.g., reduced infection rates leading to lower treatment costs) against the cost of the new catheter, while safety considerations ensure the device minimizes patient risk, such as reducing biofilm formation or irritation that contributes to CAUTIs (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment). This dual focus provides evidence-based data to justify the catheter’s adoption, aligning with the goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).
Option A (staff member preference and product availability) is subjective and logistical rather than evidence-based, making it insufficient for a decision that impacts infection rates. Option B (product materials and vendor information) offers technical details but lacks the broader context of efficacy and cost-effectiveness needed for a comprehensive evaluation. Option C (value analysis and information provided by the manufacturer) includes a structured assessment of value, but it may be biased toward the manufacturer’s claims and lacks the independent safety and cost-benefit perspective critical for infection prevention decisions.
The emphasis on cost-benefit analysis and safety considerations reflects CBIC’s priority on using data-driven and patient-centered approaches to select interventions that enhance infection control (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.5 - Use data to guide infection prevention and control strategies). This approach ensures the catheter’s selection is supported by robust evidence, optimizing both clinical and economic outcomes in the prevention of CAUTIs.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.5 - Use data to guide infection prevention and control strategies; Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment.
Which of the following factors should be considered when evaluating countertop surface materials?
Durability
Sink design
Accessibility
Faucet placement
The correct answer is A, "Durability," as it is a critical factor to consider when evaluating countertop surface materials. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, the selection of materials in healthcare settings, including countertop surfaces, must prioritize infection prevention and control. Durability ensures that the surface can withstand frequent cleaning, disinfection, and physical wear without degrading, which is essential to maintain a hygienic environment and prevent the harboring of pathogens (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.4 - Implement environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols). Durable materials, such as solid surface composites or stainless steel, resist scratches, cracks, and moisture damage, reducing the risk of microbial growth and cross-contamination, which are significant concerns in healthcare facilities.
Option B (sink design) relates more to the plumbing and fixture layout rather than the inherent properties of the countertop material itself. While sink placement and design are important for workflow and hygiene, they are secondary to the material's characteristics. Option C (accessibility) is a consideration for user convenience and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), but it pertains more to the installation and layout rather than the material's suitability for infection control. Option D (faucet placement) affects usability and water management but is not a direct attribute of the countertop material.
The emphasis on durability aligns with CBIC’s focus on creating environments that support effective cleaning and disinfection practices, which are vital for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Selecting durable materials helps ensure long-term infection prevention efficacy, making it a primary factor in the evaluation process (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.5 - Evaluate the environment for infection risks).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competencies 3.4 - Implement environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols, 3.5 - Evaluate the environment for infection risks.
The Infection Prevention and Control Committee is concerned about an outbreak of Serratia marcescens in the intensive care unit. If an environmental source is suspected, the BEST method to validate this suspicion is to
apply fluorescent gel.
use ATP system.
obtain surface cultures.
perform direct practice observation.
The correct answer is C, "obtain surface cultures," as this is the best method to validate the suspicion of an environmental source for an outbreak of Serratia marcescens in the intensive care unit (ICU). According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, Serratia marcescens is an opportunistic gram-negative bacterium commonly associated with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), often linked to contaminated water, medical equipment, or environmental surfaces in ICUs. Obtaining surface cultures allows the infection preventionist (IP) to directly test environmental samples (e.g., from sinks, ventilators, or countertops) for the presence of Serratia marcescens, providing microbiological evidence to confirm or rule out an environmental source (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.2 - Analyze surveillance data). This method is considered the gold standard for outbreak investigations when an environmental reservoir is suspected, as it offers specific pathogen identification and supports targeted interventions.
Option A (apply fluorescent gel) is a technique used to assess cleaning efficacy by highlighting areas missed during disinfection, but it does not directly identify the presence of Serratia marcescens or confirm an environmental source. Option B (use ATP system) measures adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to evaluate surface cleanliness and organic residue, which can indicate poor cleaning practices, but it is not specific to detecting Serratia marcescens and lacks the diagnostic precision of cultures. Option D (perform direct practice observation) is valuable for assessing staff adherence to infection control protocols, but it addresses human factors rather than directly validating an environmental source, making it less relevant as the initial step in this context.
The focus on obtaining surface cultures aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on using evidence-based methods to investigate and control HAIs, enabling the IP to collaborate with the committee to pinpoint the source and implement corrective measures (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.3 - Identify risk factors for healthcare-associated infections). This approach is supported by CDC guidelines for outbreak investigations, which prioritize microbiological sampling to guide environmental control strategies (CDC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Healthcare Facilities, 2019).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competencies 2.2 - Analyze surveillance data, 2.3 - Identify risk factors for healthcare-associated infections. CDC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Healthcare Facilities, 2019.
A surgical team is performing a liver transplant. Which of the following represents the HIGHEST risk for transmission of a healthcare-associated infection?
Failure to change surgical gloves after contamination.
Using alcohol-based hand rub instead of surgical scrub.
Delayed administration of preoperative antibiotics.
Airflow disruption due to personnel movement.
Glove Contamination and SSI Risk:
Failure to change contaminated gloves increases the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs).
Double-gloving with an outer glove change reduces contamination.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
B. Alcohol-based hand rubs: Are FDA-approved alternatives to traditional scrubs and effective.
C. Delayed antibiotics: Increases infection risk, but immediate correction reduces harm.
D. Airflow disruption: Can increase SSI risk, but glove contamination poses a more direct threat.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC-JCR Workbook, "Surgical Infection Prevention," Chapter 6.
In which of the following ways is human immunodeficiency virus similar to the Hepatitis B virus?
The primary mechanism of transmission for both is maternal-fetal
Needlestick exposure leads to a high frequency of healthcare worker infection
Transmission may occur from asymptomatic carriers
The risk of infection from mucous membrane exposure is the same
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) are both bloodborne pathogens that pose significant risks in healthcare settings, and understanding their similarities is crucial for infection prevention and control. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes the importance of recognizing transmission modes and implementing appropriate precautions in the "Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases" domain, aligning with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Comparing these viruses involves evaluating their epidemiology, transmission routes, and occupational risks.
Option C, "Transmission may occur from asymptomatic carriers," is the correct answer. Both HIV and HBV can be transmitted by individuals who are infected but show no symptoms, making asymptomatic carriage a significant similarity. For HBV, chronic carriers (estimated at 257 million globally per WHO, 2019) can transmit the virus through blood, semen, or other bodily fluids without overt signs of disease. Similarly, HIV-infected individuals can remain asymptomatic for years during the latent phase, yet still transmit the virus through sexual contact, blood exposure, or perinatal transmission. The CDC’s "Guidelines for Prevention of Transmission of HIV and HBV to Healthcare Workers" (1987, updated 2011) and "Epidemiology and Prevention of Viral Hepatitis" (2018) highlight this shared characteristic, underscoring the need for universal precautions regardless of symptom status.
Option A, "The primary mechanism of transmission for both is maternal-fetal," is incorrect. While maternal-fetal transmission (perinatal transmission) is a significant route for both HIV and HBV—occurring in 5-10% of cases without intervention for HBV and 15-45% for HIV without antiretroviral therapy—it is not the primary mechanism. For HBV, the primary mode is horizontal transmission through unprotected sexual contact or percutaneous exposure (e.g., needlesticks), accounting for the majority of cases. For HIV, sexual transmission and intravenous drug use are the leading modes globally, with maternal-fetal transmission being a smaller proportion despite its importance. Option B, "Needlestick exposure leads to a high frequency of healthcare worker infection," is partially true but not a precise similarity. Needlestick exposures carry a high risk for HBV (transmission risk ~30% if the source is HBeAg-positive) and a lower risk for HIV (~0.3%), but the frequency of infection among healthcare workers is significantly higher for HBV due to its greater infectivity and stability outside the host. This makes the statement more characteristic of HBV than a shared trait. Option D, "The risk of infection from mucous membrane exposure is the same," is false. The risk of HIV transmission via mucous membrane exposure (e.g., splash to eyes or mouth) is approximately 0.09%, while for HBV it is higher (up to 1-2% depending on viral load and exposure type), reflecting HBV’s greater infectivity.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines emphasize the role of asymptomatic transmission in shaping infection control strategies, such as routine testing and post-exposure prophylaxis. This shared feature of HIV and HBV justifies Option C as the most accurate similarity.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Guidelines for Prevention of Transmission of HIV and HBV to Healthcare Workers, 2011.
CDC Epidemiology and Prevention of Viral Hepatitis, 2018.
WHO Hepatitis B Fact Sheet, 2019.
Which of the following is the correct collection technique to obtain a laboratory specimen for suspected pertussis?
Cough plate
Nares culture
Sputum culture
Nasopharyngeal culture
The gold standard specimen for diagnosing pertussis (Bordetella pertussis infection) is a nasopharyngeal culture because:
B. pertussis colonizes the nasopharynx, making it the best site for detection.
A properly collected nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate increases diagnostic sensitivity.
This method is recommended for culture, PCR, or direct fluorescent antibody testing.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
A. Cough plate – Not commonly used due to low sensitivity.
B. Nares culture – The nares are not a primary site for pertussis colonization.
C. Sputum culture – B. pertussis does not commonly infect the lower respiratory tract.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
APIC confirms that nasopharyngeal culture is the preferred method for diagnosing pertussis.
An infection preventionist is preparing a report about an outbreak of scabies in a long-term care facility. How would this information be displayed in an epidemic curve?
List case names, room numbers, and date the infestation was identified using a logarithmic scale.
List case medical record numbers and the number of days in the facility to date of onset, showing data in a scatter plot.
Prepare a bar graph with no patient identifiers showing the number of cases over a specific period of time.
Prepare a scatter plot by patient location showing case prevalence over a specific period of time.
An epidemic curve, commonly used in infection prevention and control to visualize the progression of an outbreak, is a graphical representation of the number of cases over time. According to the principles outlined by the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC), an epidemic curve is most effectively displayed using a bar graph or histogram that tracks the number of new cases by date or time interval (e.g., daily, weekly) without revealing patient identifiers, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations such as HIPAA. Option C aligns with this standard practice, as it specifies preparing a bar graph with no patient identifiers, focusing solely on the number of cases over a specific period. This allows infection preventionists to identify patterns, such as the peak of the outbreak or potential sources of transmission, while maintaining confidentiality.
Option A is incorrect because listing case names and room numbers with a logarithmic scale violates patient privacy and is not a standard method for constructing an epidemic curve. Logarithmic scales are typically used for data with a wide range of values, but they are not the preferred format for epidemic curves, which prioritize clarity over time. Option B is also incorrect, as using medical record numbers and scatter plots to show days in the facility to onset does not align with the definition of an epidemic curve, which focuses on case counts over time rather than individual patient timelines or scatter plot formats. Option D is inappropriate because a scatter plot by patient location emphasizes spatial distribution rather than the temporal progression central to an epidemic curve. While location data can be useful in outbreak investigations, it is typically analyzed separately from the epidemic curve.
The CBIC emphasizes the importance of epidemic curves in the "Identification of Infectious Disease Processes" domain, where infection preventionists use such tools to monitor and control outbreaks (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022). Specifically, the use of anonymized data in graphical formats is a best practice to protect patient information while providing actionable insights, as detailed in the CBIC Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) guidelines.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CBIC Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines (IPC), Section on Outbreak Investigation and Epidemic Curve Construction.
An infection preventionist (IP) observes an increase in primary bloodstream infections in patients admitted through the Emergency Department. Poor technique is suspected when peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters are inserted. The IP should FIRST stratify infections by:
Location of IV insertion: pre-hospital, Emergency Department, or in-patient unit.
Type of dressing used: gauze, CHG impregnated sponge, or transparent.
Site of insertion: hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa.
Type of skin preparation used for the IV site: alcohol, CHG/alcohol, or iodophor.
When an infection preventionist (IP) identifies an increase in primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter insertion, the initial step in outbreak investigation and process improvement is to stratify the data to identify potential sources or patterns of infection. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC), the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain emphasizes the importance of systematically analyzing data to pinpoint contributing factors, such as location, technique, or equipment use, in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The question specifies poor technique as a suspected cause, and the first step should focus on contextual factors that could influence technique variability.
Option A, stratifying infections by the location of IV insertion (pre-hospital, Emergency Department, or in-patient unit), is the most logical first step. Different settings may involve varying levels of training, staffing, time pressure, or adherence to aseptic technique, all of which can impact infection rates. For example, pre-hospital settings (e.g., ambulance services) may have less controlled environments or less experienced personnel compared to in-patient units, potentially leading to technique inconsistencies. The CDC’s Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections (2017) recommend evaluating the context of catheter insertion as a critical initial step in investigating BSIs, making this a priority for the IP to identify where the issue is most prevalent.
Option B, stratifying by the type of dressing used (gauze, CHG impregnated sponge, or transparent), is important but should follow initial location-based analysis. Dressings play a role in maintaining catheter site integrity and preventing infection, but their impact is secondary to the insertion technique itself. Option C, stratifying by the site of insertion (hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa), is also relevant, as anatomical sites differ in infection risk (e.g., the hand may be more prone to contamination), but this is a more specific factor to explore after broader contextual data is assessed. Option D, stratifying by the type of skin preparation used (alcohol, CHG/alcohol, or iodophor), addresses antiseptic efficacy, which is a key component of technique. However, without first understanding where the insertions occur, it’s premature to focus on skin preparation alone, as technique issues may stem from systemic factors across locations.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) supports a stepwise approach to HAI investigation, starting with broad stratification (e.g., by location) to guide subsequent detailed analysis (e.g., technique-specific factors). This aligns with the CDC’s hierarchical approach to infection prevention, where contextual data collection precedes granular process evaluation. Therefore, the IP should first stratify by location to establish a baseline for further investigation.
References:
CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
CDC Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, 2017.
What inflammatory reaction may occur in the eye after cataract surgery due to a breach in disinfection and sterilization of intraocular surgical instruments?
Endophthalmitis
Bacterial conjunctivitis
Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome
Toxic Posterior Segment Syndrome
The correct answer is C, "Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome," as this is the inflammatory reaction that may occur in the eye after cataract surgery due to a breach in disinfection and sterilization of intraocular surgical instruments. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS) is a sterile, acute inflammatory reaction that can result from contaminants introduced during intraocular surgery, such as endotoxins, residues from improper cleaning, or chemical agents left on surgical instruments due to inadequate disinfection or sterilization processes (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment). TASS typically presents within 12-48 hours post-surgery with symptoms like pain, redness, and anterior chamber inflammation, and it is distinct from infectious causes because it is not microbial in origin. A breach in reprocessing protocols, such as failure to remove detergents or improper sterilization, is a known risk factor, making it highly relevant to infection prevention efforts in surgical settings.
Option A (endophthalmitis) is an infectious inflammation of the internal eye structures, often caused by bacterial or fungal contamination, which can also result from poor sterilization but is distinguished from TASS by its infectious nature and longer onset (days to weeks). Option B (bacterial conjunctivitis) affects the conjunctiva and is typically a surface infection unrelated to intraocular surgery or sterilization breaches of surgical instruments. Option D (toxic posterior segment syndrome) is not a recognized clinical entity in the context of cataract surgery; inflammation in the posterior segment is more commonly associated with infectious endophthalmitis or other conditions, not specifically linked to reprocessing failures.
The focus on TASS aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on ensuring safe reprocessing to prevent adverse outcomes in surgical patients, highlighting the need for rigorous infection control measures (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.5 - Evaluate the environment for infection risks). This is supported by CDC and American Academy of Ophthalmology guidelines, which identify TASS as a preventable complication linked to reprocessing errors (CDC Guidelines for Disinfection and Sterilization, 2019; AAO TASS Task Force Report, 2017).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competencies 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment, 3.5 - Evaluate the environment for infection risks. CDC Guidelines for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2019. AAO TASS Task Force Report, 2017.
The BEST roommate selection for a patient with active shingles would be a patient who has had
varicella vaccine.
treatment with acyclovir
a history of herpes simplex.
varicclla zoster immunoglobulin
A patient with active shingles (herpes zoster) is contagious to individuals who have never had varicella (chickenpox) or the varicella vaccine. The best roommate selection is someone who has received the varicella vaccine, as they are considered immune and not at risk for contracting the virus.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
B. Treatment with acyclovir – Acyclovir treats herpes zoster but does not prevent transmission to others.
C. A history of herpes simplex – Prior herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection does not confer immunity to varicella-zoster virus (VZV).
D. Varicella zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) – VZIG provides temporary immunity but does not offer long-term protection like the vaccine.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
APIC guidelines recommend placing patients with active shingles in a room with individuals immune to varicella, such as those vaccinated.
Which of the following active surveillance screening cultures would be appropriate for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (previously known as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae) (CRE)?
Rectal or peri-rectal cultures
Nares or axillary cultures
Abscess or blood cultures
Throat or nasopharyngeal cultures
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization is most commonly found in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Therefore, rectal or peri-rectal cultures are recommended for active surveillance screening.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
B. Nares or axillary cultures – CRE is not primarily found in the nasal or axillary region; this method is more relevant for detecting MRSA.
C. Abscess or blood cultures – While CRE may be present in clinical infections, these cultures are not used for screening asymptomatic carriers.
D. Throat or nasopharyngeal cultures – CRE does not commonly colonize the upper respiratory tract, so these are not ideal for active screening.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
The CDC and APIC guidelines emphasize rectal or peri-rectal swabbing as the most effective active surveillance method for CRE detection.
Which of the following processes is essential for endoscope reprocessing?
Intermediate level disinfection and contact time
Pre-cleaning, leak testing, and manual cleaning
Inspection using a borescope and horizontal storage
Leak testing, manual cleaning, and low level disinfection
The correct answer is B, "Pre-cleaning, leak testing, and manual cleaning," as these processes are essential for endoscope reprocessing. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, proper reprocessing of endoscopes is critical to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), given their complex design and susceptibility to microbial contamination. The initial steps of pre-cleaning (removing gross debris at the point of use), leak testing (ensuring the endoscope’s integrity to prevent fluid ingress), and manual cleaning (using enzymatic detergents to remove organic material) are foundational to the reprocessing cycle. These steps prepare the endoscope for high-level disinfection or sterilization by reducing bioburden and preventing damage, as outlined in standards such as AAMI ST91 (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment). Failure at this stage can compromise subsequent disinfection, making it a non-negotiable component of the process.
Option A (intermediate level disinfection and contact time) is an important step but insufficient alone, as intermediate-level disinfection does not achieve the high-level disinfection required for semi-critical devices like endoscopes, which must eliminate all microorganisms except high levels of bacterial spores. Option C (inspection using a borescope and horizontal storage) includes valuable quality control (inspection) and storage practices, but these occur later in the process and are not essential initial steps; vertical storage is often preferred to prevent damage. Option D (leak testing, manual cleaning, and low level disinfection) includes two essential steps (leak testing and manual cleaning) but is inadequate because low-level disinfection does not meet the standard for endoscopes, which require high-level disinfection or sterilization.
The emphasis on pre-cleaning, leak testing, and manual cleaning aligns with CBIC’s focus on adhering to evidence-based reprocessing protocols to ensure patient safety and prevent HAIs (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.4 - Implement environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols). These steps are mandated by guidelines to mitigate risks associated with endoscope use in healthcare settings.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competencies 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment, 3.4 - Implement environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols. AAMI ST91:2015, Flexible and semi-rigid endoscope processing in health care facilities.
When implementing a multimodal strategy (or bundle) for improving hand hygiene, the infection preventionist should focus on Calculator
signage for hand hygiene reminders.
cost effectiveness of hand hygiene products.
availability of gloves in the patient care area
institutional assessment of significant barriers.
When implementing a multimodal strategy (or bundle) for hand hygiene, the infection preventionist should first assess barriers to compliance before implementing solutions.
Step-by-Step Justification:
Understanding Barriers First:
Identifying barriers (e.g., lack of access to sinks, high workload, or poor compliance culture) is critical for effective intervention.
APIC Guidelines on Hand Hygiene Improvement:
Strategies must be tailored based on the institution's specific challenges.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Signage for hand hygiene reminders:
Signage alone is insufficient without addressing systemic barriers.
B. Cost-effectiveness of hand hygiene products:
While important, cost analysis comes after identifying compliance barriers.
C. Availability of gloves in the patient care area:
Gloves do not replace hand hygiene and may lead to lower compliance.
CBIC Infection Control References:
APIC/JCR Workbook, "Hand Hygiene Compliance and Institutional Barriers".
APIC Text, "Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategies".
An adult with an incomplete vaccination history presents with an uncontrollable, rapid and violent cough, fever, and runny nose. Healthcare personnel should suspect
Pertussis.
Rhinovirus.
Bronchitis.
Adenovirus.
The correct answer is A, "Pertussis," as healthcare personnel should suspect this condition based on the presented symptoms and the patient’s incomplete vaccination history. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, pertussis, caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, is characterized by an initial phase of mild respiratory symptoms (e.g., runny nose, low-grade fever) followed by a distinctive uncontrollable, rapid, and violent cough, often described as a "whooping" cough. This presentation is particularly concerning in adults with incomplete vaccination histories, as the pertussis vaccine’s immunity (e.g., DTaP or Tdap) wanes over time, increasing susceptibility (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I: Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competency 1.1 - Identify infectious disease processes). Pertussis is highly contagious and poses a significant risk in healthcare settings, necessitating prompt suspicion and isolation to prevent transmission.
Option B (rhinovirus) typically causes the common cold with symptoms like runny nose, sore throat, and mild cough, but it lacks the violent, paroxysmal cough characteristic of pertussis. Option C (bronchitis) may involve cough and fever, often due to viral or bacterial infection, but it is not typically associated with the rapid and violent cough pattern or linked to vaccination status in the same way as pertussis. Option D (adenovirus) can cause respiratory symptoms, including cough and fever, but it is more commonly associated with conjunctivitis or pharyngitis and does not feature the hallmark violent cough of pertussis.
The suspicion of pertussis aligns with CBIC’s emphasis on recognizing infectious disease patterns to initiate timely infection control measures, such as droplet precautions and prophylaxis for exposed individuals (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.2 - Implement measures to prevent transmission of infectious agents). Early identification is critical, especially in healthcare settings, to protect vulnerable patients and staff, and the incomplete vaccination history supports this differential diagnosis given pertussis’s vaccine-preventable nature (CDC Pink Book: Pertussis, 2021).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I: Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competency 1.1 - Identify infectious disease processes; Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.2 - Implement measures to prevent transmission of infectious agents. CDC Pink Book: Pertussis, 2021.
TESTED 16 Mar 2025
Copyright © 2014-2025 DumpsTool. All Rights Reserved