MLS-C01 Questions and Answers

The solution C meets the requirements because it minimizes costs for compute infrastructure, maximizes the scalability of resources for training, and facilitates the use of an ML model in low-connectivity environments. The solution C involves the following steps:

Move the training data to an Amazon S3 bucket. This will enable the company to store the large amount of data in a durable, scalable, and cost-effective way. It will also allow the company to access the data from the cloud for training and evaluation purposes1.

Train and evaluate the model by using Amazon SageMaker. This will enable the company to use a fully managed service that provides various features and tools for building, training, tuning, and deploying ML models. Amazon SageMaker can handle large-scale data processing and distributed training, and it can leverage the power of AWS compute resources such as Amazon EC2, Amazon EKS, and AWS Fargate2.

Optimize the model by using SageMaker Neo. This will enable the company to reduce the size of the model and improve its performance and efficiency. SageMaker Neo can compile the model into an executable that can run on various hardware platforms, such as CPUs, GPUs, and edge devices3.

Set up an edge device in the manufacturing facilities with AWS IoT Greengrass. This will enable the company to deploy the model on a local device that can run inference in real time, even in low-connectivity environments. AWS IoT Greengrass can extend AWS cloud capabilities to the edge, and it can securely communicate with the cloud for updates and synchronization4.

Deploy the model on the edge device. This will enable the company to automate quality control in its facilities by using the model to detect defects in new parts as they move on a conveyor belt. The model can run inference locally on the edge device without requiring internet connectivity, and it can send the results to the cloud when the connection is available4.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Deploying the model on a SageMaker hosting services endpoint will not facilitate the use of the model in low-connectivity environments, as it will require internet access to perform inference. Moreover, it may incur higher costs for hosting and data transfer than deploying the model on an edge device.

Option B: Training and evaluating the model on premises will not minimize costs for compute infrastructure, as it will require the company to maintain and upgrade its own hardware and software. Moreover, it will not maximize the scalability of resources for training, as it will limit the company’s ability to leverage the cloud’s elasticity and flexibility.

Option D: Training the model on premises will not minimize costs for compute infrastructure, nor maximize the scalability of resources for training, for the same reasons as option B.

References:

1: Amazon S3

2: Amazon SageMaker

3: SageMaker Neo

4: AWS IoT Greengrass

Recall and precision are two metrics that can be used to evaluate the performance of a classification model. Recall is the ratio of true positives to the total number of actual positives, which measures how well the model can identify all the relevant cases. Precision is the ratio of true positives to the total number of predicted positives, which measures how accurate the model is when it makes a positive prediction. Based on the confusion matrix in the image, we can calculate the recall and precision as follows:

Recall = TP / (TP + FN) = 12 / (12 + 1) = 0.92

Precision = TP / (TP + FP) = 12 / (12 + 3) = 0.8

Where TP is the number of true positives, FN is the number of false negatives, and FP is the number of false positives. Therefore, the recall and precision of the model are 0.92 and 0.8, respectively.

The best solution to meet the requirements is to apply Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to the training dataset before training. SMOTE is a technique that generates synthetic samples for the minority class by interpolating between existing samples. This can help balance the class distribution and provide more information to the model. SMOTE can improve the performance of the model on the minority class, which is the class of interest in churn prediction. SMOTE can be applied using the SageMaker Data Wrangler, which provides a built-in analysis for oversampling the minority class1.

The other options are not effective solutions for the problem. Applying anomaly detection to remove outliers from the training dataset before training may not improve the model’s accuracy, as outliers may not be the main cause of the false results. Moreover, removing outliers may reduce the diversity of the data and make the model less robust. Applying normalization to the features of the training dataset before training may improve the model’s convergence and stability, but it does not address the class imbalance issue. Normalization can also be applied using the SageMaker Data Wrangler, which provides a built-in transformation for scaling the features2. Applying undersampling to the training dataset before training may reduce the class imbalance, but it also discards potentially useful information from the majority class. Undersampling can also result in underfitting and high bias for the model.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Transform and Export

•SMOTE for Imbalanced Classification with Python

•Churn prediction using Amazon SageMaker built-in tabular algorithms LightGBM, CatBoost, TabTransformer, and AutoGluon-Tabular

 The best solution for building a line-counting application for use in a quick-service restaurant is to use the following steps:

Build a custom model in Amazon SageMaker to recognize the number of people in an image. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides tools and workflows for building, training, and deploying machine learning models. A custom model can be tailored to the specific use case of line-counting and achieve higher accuracy than a generic model1

Deploy AWS DeepLens cameras in the restaurant to capture video. AWS DeepLens is a wireless video camera that integrates with Amazon SageMaker and AWS Lambda. It can run machine learning inference locally on the device without requiring internet connectivity or streaming video to the cloud. This reduces the bandwidth consumption and latency of the application2

Deploy the model to the cameras. AWS DeepLens allows users to deploy trained models from Amazon SageMaker to the cameras with a few clicks. The cameras can then use the model to process the video frames and count the number of people in each frame2

Deploy an AWS Lambda function to the cameras to use the model to count people and send an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) notification if the line is too long. AWS Lambda is a serverless computing service that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS DeepLens supports running Lambda functions on the device to perform actions based on the inference results. Amazon SNS is a service that enables users to send notifications to subscribers via email, SMS, or mobile push23

The other options are incorrect because they either require internet connectivity or streaming video to the cloud, which may impact the bandwidth and performance of the application. For example:

Option A uses Amazon Kinesis Video Streams to stream the data to AWS over the restaurant’s existing internet connection. Amazon Kinesis Video Streams is a service that enables users to capture, process, and store video streams for analytics and machine learning. However, this option requires streaming multiple video streams to the cloud, which may consume a lot of bandwidth and cause network congestion. It also requires internet connectivity, which may not be reliable or available in some locations4

Option B uses Amazon Rekognition on the AWS DeepLens device. Amazon Rekognition is a service that provides computer vision capabilities, such as face detection, face recognition, and object detection. However, this option requires calling the Amazon Rekognition API over the internet, which may introduce latency and require bandwidth. It also uses a generic face detection model, which may not be optimized for the line-counting use case.

Option C uses Amazon SageMaker to build a custom model and an Amazon SageMaker endpoint to call the model. Amazon SageMaker endpoints are hosted web services that allow users to perform inference on their models. However, this option requires sending the images to the endpoint over the internet, which may consume bandwidth and introduce latency. It also requires internet connectivity, which may not be reliable or available in some locations.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker – Machine Learning Service - AWS

2: AWS DeepLens - Deep learning enabled video camera - AWS

3: Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) - AWS

4: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams - Amazon Web Services

: Amazon Rekognition – Video and Image - AWS

: Deploy a Model - Amazon SageMaker

Collaborative filtering is a machine learning technique that recommends products or services to users based on the ratings or preferences of other users. This technique is well-suited for identifying customer shopping patterns and preferences because it takes into account the interactions between users and products.

Data normalization is a data preprocessing technique that scales the features to a common range, such as [0, 1] or [-1, 1]. This helps reduce the impact of features with high magnitude on the cost function and improves the convergence during backpropagation. Data normalization can be done using different methods, such as min-max scaling, z-score standardization, or unit vector normalization. Data normalization is different from dimensionality reduction, which reduces the number of features; model regularization, which adds a penalty term to the cost function to prevent overfitting; and data augmentation, which increases the amount of data by creating synthetic samples. References:

Data processing options for AI/ML | AWS Machine Learning Blog

Data preprocessing - Machine Learning Lens

How to Normalize Data Using scikit-learn in Python

Normalization | Machine Learning | Google for Developers

One-hot encoding is a technique that can be used to convert a categorical variable, such as the Day-Of_Week column, to binary values. One-hot encoding creates a new binary column for each unique value in the original column, and assigns a value of 1 to the column that corresponds to the value in the original column, and 0 to the rest. For example, if the original column has values Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, one-hot encoding will create seven new columns, each representing one day of the week. If the value in the original column is Tuesday, then the column for Tuesday will have a value of 1, and the other columns will have a value of 0. One-hot encoding can help improve the performance of machine learning models, as it eliminates the ordinal relationship between the values and creates a more informative and sparse representation of the data.

References:

One-Hot Encoding - Amazon SageMaker

One-Hot Encoding: A Simple Guide for Beginners | by Jana Schmidt …

One-Hot Encoding in Machine Learning | by Nishant Malik | Towards …

The goal of classification is to determine to which class or category a data point (customer in our case) belongs to. For classification problems, data scientists would use historical data with predefined target variables AKA labels (churner/non-churner) – answers that need to be predicted – to train an algorithm. With classification, businesses can answer the following questions:

Will this customer churn or not?

Will a customer renew their subscription?

Will a user downgrade a pricing plan?

Are there any signs of unusual customer behavior?

 The engineer should create a private workforce and manifest file, and then create a labeling job by using the built-in bounding box task type in Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth. This will allow the engineer to build the labeling pipeline with the least effort.

A private workforce is a group of workers that you manage and who have access to your labeling tasks. You can use a private workforce to label sensitive data that requires confidentiality, such as medical images. You can create a private workforce by using Amazon Cognito and inviting workers by email. You can also use AWS Single Sign-On or your own authentication system to manage your private workforce.

A manifest file is a JSON file that lists the Amazon S3 locations of your input data. You can use a manifest file to specify the data objects that you want to label in your labeling job. You can create a manifest file by using the AWS CLI, the AWS SDK, or the Amazon SageMaker console.

A labeling job is a process that sends your input data to workers for labeling. You can use the Amazon SageMaker console to create a labeling job and choose from several built-in task types, such as image classification, text classification, semantic segmentation, and bounding box. A bounding box task type allows workers to draw boxes around objects in an image and assign labels to them. This is suitable for object detection tasks, such as identifying areas of concern on CT scans.

References:

Create and Manage Workforces - Amazon SageMaker

Use Input and Output Data - Amazon SageMaker

Create a Labeling Job - Amazon SageMaker

Bounding Box Task Type - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. SageMaker provides a variety of tools and frameworks to support the entire machine learning workflow, from data preparation to model deployment.

One of the tools that SageMaker offers is the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK, which is a high-level library that simplifies the interaction with SageMaker APIs and services. The SageMaker Python SDK allows you to write code in Python and use popular frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet, and more. You can use the SageMaker Python SDK to create and manage SageMaker resources such as notebook instances, training jobs, endpoints, and feature store.

If you need to continue working on a TensorFlow project using SageMaker for training without Wi-Fi access, the best approach is to download the TensorFlow Docker container used in SageMaker from GitHub to your local environment, and use the SageMaker Python SDK to test the code. This way, you can ensure that your code is compatible with the SageMaker environment and avoid any potential issues when you upload your code to SageMaker and start the training job. You can also use the same code to deploy your model to a SageMaker endpoint when you have Wi-Fi access again.

To download the TensorFlow Docker container used in SageMaker, you can visit the SageMaker Docker GitHub repository and follow the instructions to build the image locally. You can also use the SageMaker Studio Image Build CLI to automate the process of building and pushing the Docker image to Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR). To use the SageMaker Python SDK to test the code, you can install the SDK on your local machine by following the installation guide. You can also refer to the TensorFlow documentation for more details on how to use the SageMaker Python SDK with TensorFlow.

References:

SageMaker Docker GitHub repository

SageMaker Studio Image Build CLI

SageMaker Python SDK installation guide

SageMaker Python SDK TensorFlow documentation

The best way to handle the missing values in the patient age feature is to replace them with the mean or median value from the dataset. This is a common technique for imputing missing values that preserves the overall distribution of the data and avoids introducing bias or reducing the sample size. Dropping the records or the feature would result in losing valuable information and reducing the accuracy of the model. Using k-means clustering would not be appropriate for handling missing values in a single feature, as it is a method for grouping similar data points based on multiple features.

References:

Effective Strategies to Handle Missing Values in Data Analysis

How To Handle Missing Values In Machine Learning Data With Weka

How to handle missing values in Python - Machine Learning Plus

In this scenario, Kinesis Data Streams efficiently ingests real-time event data, while Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (formerly Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) is ideal for transforming and analyzing data in a continuous stream. Apache Flink allows processing of time-based windows, such as the 10-minute sliding window required here, with low operational overhead.

This combination provides an effective solution for low-latency data processing and transformation, meeting the requirements for preparing data for inference with minimal setup and serverless scalability.

Pipe input mode is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that allows streaming large datasets from Amazon S3 directly to the training algorithm without downloading them to the local disk. This reduces the startup time, disk space, and cost of training jobs. Pipe input mode is supported by most of the built-in algorithms and can also be used with custom training algorithms. To use Pipe input mode, the data needs to be in a binary format such as protobuf recordIO or TFRecord. The training code needs to use the PipeModeDataset class to read the data from the named pipe provided by SageMaker. To verify that the training code and the model parameters are working as expected, it is recommended to train locally on a smaller subset of the data before launching a full-scale training job on SageMaker. This approach is faster and more efficient than the other options, which involve either downloading the full dataset to an EC2 instance or using AWS Glue, which is not designed for training machine learning models. References:

Using Pipe input mode for Amazon SageMaker algorithms

Using Pipe Mode with Your Own Algorithms

PipeModeDataset Class

The best solution for this scenario is to set up an AWS Glue job that has the Amazon Redshift cluster as the source and the S3 bucket as the destination, and use the built-in transforms Filter, Map, and RenameField to perform the required transformations. This solution has the following advantages:

It minimizes the effort that is needed to set up infrastructure for the ingestion and transformation, as AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless Apache Spark environment, a graphical interface to define data sources and targets, and a code generation feature to create and edit scripts1.

It automates the extraction and transformation process, as AWS Glue can schedule the job to run monthly, and handle the connection, authentication, and configuration of the Amazon Redshift cluster and the S3 bucket2.

It minimizes the load on the Amazon Redshift cluster, as AWS Glue can read the data from the cluster in parallel and use a JDBC connection that supports SSL encryption3.

It performs the required transformations, as AWS Glue can use the built-in transforms Filter, Map, and RenameField to remove the rows with NULL values, split the timestamp column into date and time columns, and rename the card name column, respectively4.

The other solutions are not optimal or suitable, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Setting up an Amazon EMR cluster and creating an Apache Spark job to read the data from the Amazon Redshift cluster and transform the data is not the most efficient or convenient solution, as it requires more effort and resources to provision, configure, and manage the EMR cluster, and to write and maintain the Spark code5.

B: Setting up an Amazon EC2 instance with a SQL client tool to query the data from the Amazon Redshift cluster directly and export the resulting dataset into a CSV file is not a scalable or reliable solution, as it depends on the availability and performance of the EC2 instance, and the manual execution and upload of the SQL queries and the CSV file6.

D: Using Amazon Redshift Spectrum to run a query that writes the data directly to the S3 bucket and creating an AWS Lambda function to run the query monthly is not a feasible solution, as Amazon Redshift Spectrum does not support writing data to external tables or S3 buckets, only reading data from them7.

References:

1: What Is AWS Glue? - AWS Glue

2: Populating the Data Catalog - AWS Glue

3: Best Practices When Using AWS Glue with Amazon Redshift - AWS Glue

4: Built-In Transforms - AWS Glue

5: What Is Amazon EMR? - Amazon EMR

6: Amazon EC2 - Amazon Web Services (AWS)

7: Using Amazon Redshift Spectrum to Query External Data - Amazon Redshift

The most direct approach to solve this problem within 2 days is to train a custom classifier by using Amazon Comprehend. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that can analyze text and extract insights such as sentiment, entities, topics, and syntax. Amazon Comprehend also provides a custom classification feature that allows users to create and train a custom text classifier using their own labeled data. The custom classifier can then be used to categorize any text document into one or more custom classes. For this use case, the custom classifier can be trained to identify reviews that express concerns over product durability as a class, and use the star rating, review text, and review summary fields as input features. The custom classifier can be created and trained using the Amazon Comprehend console or API, and does not require any coding or machine learning expertise. The training process is fully managed and scalable, and can handle large and complex datasets. The custom classifier can be trained and ready to review in 2 days or less, depending on the size and quality of the dataset.

The other options are not the most direct approaches because:

Option B: Building a recurrent neural network (RNN) in Amazon SageMaker by using Gluon and Apache MXNet is a more complex and time-consuming approach that requires coding and machine learning skills. RNNs are a type of deep learning models that can process sequential data, such as text, and learn long-term dependencies between tokens. Gluon is a high-level API for MXNet that simplifies the development of deep learning models. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides tools and frameworks for building, training, and deploying machine learning models. However, to use this approach, the machine learning specialist would have to write custom code to preprocess the data, define the RNN architecture, train the model, and evaluate the results. This would likely take more than 2 days and involve more administrative overhead.

Option C: Training a built-in BlazingText model using Word2Vec mode in Amazon SageMaker is not a suitable approach for text classification. BlazingText is a built-in algorithm in Amazon SageMaker that provides highly optimized implementations of the Word2Vec and text classification algorithms. The Word2Vec algorithm is useful for generating word embeddings, which are dense vector representations of words that capture their semantic and syntactic similarities. However, word embeddings alone are not sufficient for text classification, as they do not account for the context and structure of the text documents. To use this approach, the machine learning specialist would have to combine the word embeddings with another classifier model, such as a logistic regression or a neural network, which would add more complexity and time to the solution.

Option D: Using a built-in seq2seq model in Amazon SageMaker is not a relevant approach for text classification. Seq2seq is a built-in algorithm in Amazon SageMaker that provides a sequence-to-sequence framework for neural machine translation based on MXNet. Seq2seq is a supervised learning algorithm that can generate an output sequence of tokens given an input sequence of tokens, such as translating a sentence from one language to another. However, seq2seq is not designed for text classification, which requires assigning a label or a category to a text document, not generating another text sequence. To use this approach, the machine learning specialist would have to modify the seq2seq algorithm to fit the text classification task, which would be challenging and inefficient.

References:

Custom Classification - Amazon Comprehend

Build a Text Classification Model with Amazon Comprehend - AWS Machine Learning Blog

Recurrent Neural Networks - Gluon API

BlazingText Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Sequence-to-Sequence Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

According to the Amazon Kinesis Data Streams documentation, the maximum size of data blob (the data payload before Base64-encoding) per record is 1 MB. The maximum number of records that can be sent to a shard per second is 1,000. Therefore, the maximum throughput of a shard is 1 MB/sec for input and 2 MB/sec for output. In this case, the input throughput is 100 transactions per second * 100 KB per transaction = 10 MB/sec. Therefore, the minimum number of shards required is 10 MB/sec / 1 MB/sec = 10 shards. However, the question asks for the minimum number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams, not the minimum number of shards per stream. A Kinesis Data Streams account can have multiple streams, each with its own number of shards. Therefore, the minimum number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams is 1, which is the minimum number of shards per stream. References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Terminology and Concepts

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Limits

The input mode for the training job determines how the training data is transferred from Amazon S3 to the SageMaker instance. There are two input modes: File and Pipe. File mode copies the entire training dataset from S3 to the local file system of the instance before starting the training job. This can cause a long delay before the training job launches, especially if the dataset is large. Pipe mode streams the data from S3 to the instance as the training job runs. This can reduce the startup time and improve the I/O throughput, as the data is read in smaller batches. Therefore, to address the performance issues with the current solution, the Specialist should ensure that the input mode for the training job is set to Pipe. This can be done by using the SageMaker Python SDK and setting the input_mode parameter to Pipe when creating the estimator or the fit method12. Alternatively, this can be done by using the AWS CLI and setting the InputMode parameter to Pipe when creating the training job3.

References:

Access Training Data - Amazon SageMaker

Choosing Data Input Mode Using the SageMaker Python SDK - Amazon SageMaker

CreateTrainingJob - Amazon SageMaker Service

 Residual plots are a model evaluation technique that can be used to understand whether a regression model is more frequently overestimating or underestimating the target. Residual plots are graphs that plot the residuals (the difference between the actual and predicted values) against the predicted values or other variables. Residual plots can help the Machine Learning Specialist to identify the patterns and trends in the residuals, such as the direction, shape, and distribution. Residual plots can also reveal the presence of outliers, heteroscedasticity, non-linearity, or other problems in the model12

To determine whether the model is overestimating or underestimating the target, the Machine Learning Specialist can use a residual plot that plots the residuals against the predicted values. This type of residual plot is also known as a prediction error plot. A prediction error plot can show the magnitude and direction of the errors made by the model. If the model is overestimating the target, the residuals will be negative, and the points will be below the zero line. If the model is underestimating the target, the residuals will be positive, and the points will be above the zero line. If the model is accurate, the residuals will be close to zero, and the points will be scattered around the zero line. A prediction error plot can also show the variance and bias of the model. If the model has high variance, the residuals will have a large spread, and the points will be far from the zero line. If the model has high bias, the residuals will have a systematic pattern, such as a curve or a slope, and the points will not be randomly distributed around the zero line. A prediction error plot can help the Machine Learning Specialist to optimize the model by adjusting the complexity, features, or parameters of the model34

The other options are not valid or suitable for determining whether the model is overestimating or underestimating the target. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is a model evaluation metric that measures the average magnitude of the errors made by the model. RMSE is the square root of the mean of the squared residuals. RMSE can indicate the overall accuracy and performance of the model, but it cannot show the direction or distribution of the errors. RMSE can also be influenced by outliers or extreme values, and it may not be comparable across different models or datasets5 Area under the curve (AUC) is a model evaluation metric that measures the ability of the model to distinguish between the positive and negative classes. AUC is the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which plots the true positive rate against the false positive rate for various classification thresholds. AUC can indicate the overall quality and performance of the model, but it is only applicable for binary classification models, not regression models. AUC cannot show the magnitude or direction of the errors made by the model. Confusion matrix is a model evaluation technique that summarizes the number of correct and incorrect predictions made by the model for each class. A confusion matrix is a table that shows the counts of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives for each class. A confusion matrix can indicate the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the model for each class, but it is only applicable for classification models, not regression models. A confusion matrix cannot show the magnitude or direction of the errors made by the model.

The factors that will adversely impact the performance of the forecast model are:

Sales data is aggregated by week. This will reduce the granularity and resolution of the data, and make it harder to capture the daily patterns and variations in sales volume. The data scientist should request daily sales data from the source database to enable building a daily model, which will be more accurate and useful for the prediction task.

Sales data is missing zero entries for item sales. This will introduce bias and incompleteness in the data, and make it difficult to account for the items that have no demand or are out of stock. The data scientist should request that item sales data from the source database include zero entries to enable building the model, which will be more robust and realistic.

The other options are not valid because:

Detecting seasonality for the majority of stores will not be an issue, as sales data is highly consistent from week to week. Requesting categorical data to relate new stores with similar stores that have more historical data may not improve the model performance significantly, and may introduce unnecessary complexity and noise.

The sales data does not need to have more variance, as it reflects the actual demand and behavior of the customers. Requesting external sales data from other industries will not improve the model’s ability to generalize, but may introduce irrelevant and misleading information.

Only 100 MB of sales data is not a problem, as it is sufficient to train a forecast model with Amazon S3 and Amazon Forecast. Requesting 10 years of sales data will not provide much benefit, as it may contain outdated and obsolete information that does not reflect the current market trends and customer preferences.

References:

Amazon Forecast

Forecasting: Principles and Practice

SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Quick Model visualization, which can be used to quickly evaluate the data and produce importance scores for each feature. A feature importance score indicates how useful a feature is at predicting a target label. The feature importance score is between [0, 1] and a higher number indicates that the feature is more important to the whole dataset. The Quick Model visualization uses a random forest model to calculate the feature importance for each feature using the Gini importance method. This method measures the total reduction in node impurity (a measure of how well a node separates the classes) that is attributed to splitting on a particular feature. The ML developer can use the Quick Model visualization to obtain the importance scores for each feature of the dataset and use them to feature engineer the dataset. This solution requires the least development effort compared to the other options.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Detect multicollinearity, target leakage, and feature correlation with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

To detect anomalous transactions, the company can use a combination of Random Cut Forest (RCF) and XGBoost models. RCF is an unsupervised algorithm that can detect outliers in the data by measuring the depth of each data point in a collection of random decision trees. XGBoost is a supervised algorithm that can learn from the labeled data points generated by RCF and classify them as normal or anomalous. RCF can also provide anomaly scores that can be used as features for XGBoost to improve the accuracy of the classification. References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

2: Amazon SageMaker XGBoost Algorithm

3: Anomaly Detection with Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest and Amazon SageMaker XGBoost

A hyperparameter tuning job is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that allows automatically finding the best combination of hyperparameters for a machine learning model. Hyperparameters are high-level parameters that influence the learning process and the performance of the model, such as the learning rate, the number of layers, the regularization factor, etc. A hyperparameter tuning job works by launching multiple training jobs with different hyperparameters, evaluating the results using an objective metric, and choosing the next set of hyperparameters to try based on a search strategy. The objective metric is a measure of the quality of the model, such as accuracy, precision, recall, etc. The search strategy is a method of exploring the hyperparameter space, such as random search, grid search, or Bayesian optimization.

Among the four options, option C is the most repeatable and requires the least amount of effort to use hyperparameter optimization to increase the model’s accuracy. This option involves the following steps:

Create a hyperparameter tuning job: Amazon SageMaker provides an easy-to-use interface for creating a hyperparameter tuning job, either through the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the AWS SDKs. To create a hyperparameter tuning job, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to specify the following information:

The name and type of the algorithm to use, either a built-in algorithm or a custom algorithm.

The ranges and types of the hyperparameters to tune, such as categorical, continuous, or integer.

The name and type of the objective metric to optimize, such as accuracy, and whether to maximize or minimize it.

The resource limits for the tuning job, such as the maximum number of training jobs and the maximum parallel training jobs.

The input data channels and the output data location for the training jobs.

The configuration of the training instances, such as the instance type, the instance count, the volume size, etc.

Set the accuracy as an objective metric: To use accuracy as an objective metric, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to ensure that the training algorithm writes the accuracy value to a file called metric_definitions in JSON format and prints it to stdout or stderr. For example, the file can contain the following content:

This means that the training algorithm prints a line like this:

Amazon SageMaker reads the accuracy value from the line and uses it to evaluate and compare the training jobs.

The other options are not as repeatable and require more effort than option C for the following reasons:

Option A: This option requires manually launching multiple training jobs in parallel with different hyperparameters, which can be tedious and error-prone. It also requires manually monitoring and comparing the results of the training jobs, which can be time-consuming and subjective.

Option B: This option requires writing code to create an AWS Step Functions workflow that monitors the accuracy in Amazon CloudWatch Logs and relaunches the training job with a defined list of hyperparameters, which can be complex and challenging. It also requires maintaining and updating the list of hyperparameters, which can be inefficient and suboptimal.

Option D: This option requires writing code to create a random walk in the parameter space to iterate through a range of values that should be used for each individual hyperparameter, which can be unreliable and unpredictable. It also requires defining and implementing a stopping criterion, which can be arbitrary and inconsistent.

References:

Automatic Model Tuning - Amazon SageMaker

Define Metrics to Monitor Model Performance

A VPC endpoint is a logical device that enables private connections between a VPC and supported AWS services. A VPC endpoint can be either a gateway endpoint or an interface endpoint. A gateway endpoint is a gateway that is a target for a specified route in the route table, used for traffic destined to a supported AWS service. An interface endpoint is an elastic network interface with a private IP address that serves as an entry point for traffic destined to a supported service1

In this case, the Machine Learning Specialist can create a gateway endpoint for Amazon S3, which is a supported service for gateway endpoints. A gateway endpoint for Amazon S3 enables the VPC to access Amazon S3 privately, without requiring an internet gateway, NAT device, VPN connection, or AWS Direct Connect connection. The traffic between the VPC and Amazon S3 does not leave the Amazon network2

To restrict access to the dataset stored in Amazon S3, the Machine Learning Specialist can apply a bucket access policy that allows access only from the given VPC endpoint and the VPC. A bucket access policy is a resource-based policy that defines who can access a bucket and what actions they can perform. A bucket access policy can use various conditions to control access, such as the source IP address, the source VPC, the source VPC endpoint, etc. In this case, the Machine Learning Specialist can use the aws:sourceVpce condition to specify the ID of the VPC endpoint, and the aws:sourceVpc condition to specify the ID of the VPC. This way, only the requests that originate from the VPC endpoint or the VPC can access the bucket that contains the dataset34

The other options are not valid or secure ways to satisfy the requirements. Creating a VPC endpoint and applying a bucket access policy that allows access from the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. An Amazon EC2 instance is a virtual server that runs in the AWS cloud. An Amazon EC2 instance can have a public IP address or a private IP address, depending on the network configuration. Allowing access from an Amazon EC2 instance does not guarantee that the instance is in the same VPC as the VPC endpoint, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access. Creating a VPC endpoint and using Network Access Control Lists (NACLs) to allow traffic between only the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. NACLs are stateless firewalls that can control inbound and outbound traffic at the subnet level. NACLs can use rules to allow or deny traffic based on the protocol, port, and source or destination IP address. However, NACLs do not support VPC endpoints as a source or destination, and cannot filter traffic based on the VPC endpoint ID or the VPC ID. Therefore, using NACLs does not guarantee that the traffic is from the VPC endpoint or the VPC, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access. Creating a VPC endpoint and using security groups to restrict access to the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. Security groups are stateful firewalls that can control inbound and outbound traffic at the instance level. Security groups can use rules to allow or deny traffic based on the protocol, port, and source or destination. However, security groups do not support VPC endpoints as a source or destination, and cannot filter traffic based on the VPC endpoint ID or the VPC ID. Therefore, using security groups does not guarantee that the traffic is from the VPC endpoint or the VPC, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access.

The data sources that the data scientist should use to augment the dataset of reviews are those that contain relevant and diverse customer feedback about the company or its products. Emails exchanged by customers and the company’s customer service agents can provide valuable insights into the issues and complaints that customers have, as well as the solutions and responses that the company offers. Social media posts containing the name of the company or its products can capture the opinions and sentiments of customers and potential customers, as well as their reactions to marketing campaigns and product launches. A publicly available collection of customer reviews can provide a large and varied sample of feedback from different online platforms and marketplaces, which can help to generalize the ML models and avoid bias.

References:

Detect sentiment from customer reviews using Amazon Comprehend | AWS Machine Learning Blog

How to Apply Machine Learning to Customer Feedback

The Hyperband tuning strategy is a multi-fidelity based tuning strategy that dynamically reallocates resources to the most promising hyperparameter configurations. Hyperband uses both intermediate and final results of training jobs to stop under-performing jobs and reallocate epochs to well-utilized hyperparameter configurations. Hyperband can provide up to three times faster hyperparameter tuning compared to other strategies1. Setting a lower value for the MaxNumberOfTrainingJobs parameter can also reduce the computation time for the hyperparameter tuning job by limiting the number of training jobs that the tuning job can launch. This can help avoid unnecessary or redundant training jobs that do not improve the objective metric.

The other options are not effective ways to reduce the computation time for the hyperparameter tuning job. Increasing the number of hyperparameters will increase the complexity and dimensionality of the search space, which can result in longer computation time and lower performance. Using the grid search tuning strategy will also increase the computation time, as grid search methodically searches through every combination of hyperparameter values, which can be very expensive and inefficient for large search spaces. Setting a lower value for the MaxParallelTrainingJobs parameter will reduce the number of training jobs that can run in parallel, which can slow down the tuning process and increase the waiting time.

References:

•How Hyperparameter Tuning Works

•Best Practices for Hyperparameter Tuning

•HyperparameterTuner

•Amazon SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning now provides up to three times faster hyperparameter tuning with Hyperband

 The solution A and C are the most effective in solving the issue while keeping costs to a minimum. The solution A and C involve the following steps:

Configure the endpoint to use Amazon Elastic Inference (EI) accelerators. This will enable the company to reduce the cost and latency of running TensorFlow inference on SageMaker. Amazon EI provides GPU-powered acceleration for deep learning models without requiring the use of GPU instances. Amazon EI can attach to any SageMaker instance type and provide the right amount of acceleration based on the workload1.

Configure the endpoint to automatically scale with the Invocations Per Instance metric. This will enable the company to adjust the number of instances based on the demand and traffic patterns of the website. The Invocations Per Instance metric measures the average number of requests that each instance processes over a period of time. By using this metric, the company can scale out the endpoint when the load increases and scale in when the load decreases. This can improve the response time and availability of the product recommendation engine2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Creating a new endpoint configuration with two production variants will not solve the issue of increasing response time and errors. Production variants are used to split the traffic between different models or versions of the same model. They can be useful for testing, updating, or A/B testing models. However, they do not provide any scaling or acceleration benefits for the inference workload3.

Option D: Deploying a second instance pool to support a blue/green deployment of models will not solve the issue of increasing response time and errors. Blue/green deployment is a technique for updating models without downtime or disruption. It involves creating a new endpoint configuration with a different instance pool and model version, and then shifting the traffic from the old endpoint to the new endpoint gradually. However, this technique does not provide any scaling or acceleration benefits for the inference workload4.

Option E: Reconfiguring the endpoint to use burstable instances will not solve the issue of increasing response time and errors. Burstable instances are instances that provide a baseline level of CPU performance with the ability to burst above the baseline when needed. They can be useful for workloads that have moderate CPU utilization and occasional spikes. However, they are not suitable for workloads that have high and consistent CPU utilization, such as the product recommendation engine. Moreover, burstable instances may incur additional charges when they exceed their CPU credits5.

References:

1: Amazon Elastic Inference

2: How to Scale Amazon SageMaker Endpoints

3: Deploying Models to Amazon SageMaker Hosting Services

4: Updating Models in Amazon SageMaker Hosting Services

5: Burstable Performance Instances

The data scientist should remove the stop words from the blog post data by using the Count Vectorizer function in the scikit-learn library, and replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer. This is because:

The Count Vectorizer function is a tool that can convert a collection of text documents to a matrix of token counts 1. It also enables the pre-processing of text data prior to generating the vector representation, such as removing accents, converting to lowercase, and filtering out stop words 1. By using this function, the data scientist can remove the stop words such as “a,” “an,” and “the” from the blog post data, and obtain a numerical representation of the text that can be used as input for the NTM algorithm.

The NTM algorithm is a neural network-based topic modeling technique that can learn latent topics from a corpus of documents 2. It can be used to recommend tags from blog posts by finding the most probable topics for each document, and ranking the words associated with each topic 3. However, the NTM algorithm does not perform any text pre-processing by itself, so it relies on the quality of the input data. Therefore, the data scientist should replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer, to ensure that the NTM algorithm does not include the stop words in the tag recommendations.

The other options are not suitable for the following reasons:

Option A is not relevant because the Amazon Comprehend entity recognition API operations are used to detect and extract named entities from text, such as people, places, organizations, dates, etc4. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are common words that do not carry much meaning or information. Moreover, removing the detected entities from the blog post data may reduce the quality and diversity of the tag recommendations, as some entities may be relevant and useful as tags.

Option B is not optimal because the SageMaker built-in principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm is used to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset by finding the most important features that capture the maximum amount of variance in the data 5. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are words that have low variance and high frequency in the data. Moreover, replacing the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the PCA algorithm may not be compatible with the input format expected by the NTM algorithm, which requires a bag-of-words representation of the text 2.

Option C is not suitable because the SageMaker built-in Object Detection algorithm is used to detect and localize objects in images 6. This is not related to the task of recommending tags from blog posts, which are text documents. Moreover, using the Object Detection algorithm instead of the NTM algorithm would require a different type of input data (images instead of text), and a different type of output data (bounding boxes and labels instead of topics and words).

References:

Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm

Introduction to the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model

Amazon Comprehend - Entity Recognition

sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm

Object Detection Algorithm

AWS Glue DataBrew provides a no-code data preparation interface that enables business analysts to clean and transform data from various sources, including PostgreSQL databases, without needing programming skills. Amazon SageMaker Canvas offers a no-code interface for machine learning model training and predictions, allowing users to predict future production volume without coding expertise.

This solution meets the requirements efficiently by providing end-to-end data preparation and prediction modeling without requiring coding.

The best option is to use the event tracker in Amazon Personalize to include real-time user interactions. This will allow the model to learn from the feedback of the customers during the marketing campaign and adjust the recommendations accordingly. The event tracker can capture click-through, add-to-cart, purchase, and other types of events that indicate the user’s preferences. By using the event tracker, the company can improve the relevance and freshness of the recommendations and avoid the decrease in sales.

The other options are not as effective as using the event tracker. Adding user metadata and using the HRNN-Metadata recipe in Amazon Personalize can help capture the user’s attributes and preferences, but it will not reflect the changes in user behavior during the marketing campaign. Implementing a new solution using the built-in factorization machines (FM) algorithm in Amazon SageMaker can also provide personalized recommendations, but it will require more time and effort to train and deploy the model. Adding event type and event value fields to the interactions dataset in Amazon Personalize can help capture the importance and context of each interaction, but it will not update the model with the latest user feedback.

References:

Recording events - Amazon Personalize

Using real-time events - Amazon Personalize

 XGBoost is a built-in Amazon SageMaker machine learning algorithm that should be used for modeling the credit card fraud detection problem. XGBoost is an algorithm that implements a scalable and distributed gradient boosting framework, which is a popular and effective technique for supervised learning problems. Gradient boosting is a method of combining multiple weak learners, such as decision trees, into a strong learner, by iteratively fitting new models to the residual errors of the previous models and adding them to the ensemble. XGBoost can handle various types of data, such as numerical, categorical, or text, and can perform both regression and classification tasks. XGBoost also supports various features and optimizations, such as regularization, missing value handling, parallelization, and cross-validation, that can improve the performance and efficiency of the algorithm.

XGBoost is suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem for the following reasons:

The problem is a binary classification problem, where the goal is to predict whether a transaction is fraudulent or not, based on the information from new transactions. XGBoost can perform binary classification by using a logistic regression objective function and outputting the probability of the positive class (fraudulent) for each transaction.

The problem involves a large and imbalanced dataset of historical data labeled as fraudulent. XGBoost can handle large-scale and imbalanced data by using distributed and parallel computing, as well as techniques such as weighted sampling, class weighting, or stratified sampling, to balance the classes and reduce the bias towards the majority class (non-fraudulent).

The problem requires a high accuracy and precision for detecting fraudulent transactions, as well as a low false positive rate for avoiding false alarms. XGBoost can achieve high accuracy and precision by using gradient boosting, which can learn complex and non-linear patterns from the data and reduce the variance and overfitting of the model. XGBoost can also achieve a low false positive rate by using regularization, which can reduce the complexity and noise of the model and prevent it from fitting spurious signals in the data.

The other options are not as suitable as XGBoost for the credit card fraud detection problem for the following reasons:

Seq2seq: Seq2seq is an algorithm that implements a sequence-to-sequence model, which is a type of neural network model that can map an input sequence to an output sequence. Seq2seq is mainly used for natural language processing tasks, such as machine translation, text summarization, or dialogue generation. Seq2seq is not suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem, because the problem is not a sequence-to-sequence task, but a binary classification task. The input and output of the problem are not sequences of words or tokens, but vectors of features and labels.

K-means: K-means is an algorithm that implements a clustering technique, which is a type of unsupervised learning method that can group similar data points into clusters. K-means is mainly used for exploratory data analysis, dimensionality reduction, or anomaly detection. K-means is not suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem, because the problem is not a clustering task, but a classification task. The problem requires using the labeled data to train a model that can predict the labels of new data, not finding the optimal number of clusters or the cluster memberships of the data.

Random Cut Forest (RCF): RCF is an algorithm that implements an anomaly detection technique, which is a type of unsupervised learning method that can identify data points that deviate from the normal behavior or distribution of the data. RCF is mainly used for detecting outliers, frauds, or faults in the data. RCF is not suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem, because the problem is not an anomaly detection task, but a classification task. The problem requires using the labeled data to train a model that can predict the labels of new data, not finding the anomaly scores or the anomalous data points in the data.

References:

XGBoost Algorithm

Use XGBoost for Binary Classification with Amazon SageMaker

Seq2seq Algorithm

K-means Algorithm

[Random Cut Forest Algorithm]

 Amazon Rekognition, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Transcribe are AWS machine learning services that can analyze and extract metadata from images, text, audio, and video content. These services are easy to use, scalable, and do not require any machine learning expertise. They can help the media company to quickly index its assets and enable rapid identification of relevant content by the research team. Using these services is the fastest route to index the assets, compared to the other options that involve human intervention, custom model development, or additional steps. References:

AWS Media Intelligence Solutions

AWS Machine Learning Services

The Best Services For Running Machine Learning Models On AWS

The best visualization for this task is to create a bar plot, faceted by year, of average sales for each region and add a horizontal line in each facet to represent average sales. This way, the data scientist can easily compare the yearly average sales for each region with the overall average sales and see the trends over time. The bar plot also allows the data scientist to see the relative performance of each region within each year and across years. The other options are less effective because they either do not show the yearly trends, do not show the overall average sales, or do not group the data by region.

References:

pandas.DataFrame.groupby — pandas 2.1.4 documentation

pandas.DataFrame.plot.bar — pandas 2.1.4 documentation

Matplotlib - Bar Plot - Online Tutorials Library

The best solution to improve the accuracy of the model and receive notifications for any future performance issues is to perform incremental training to update the model and activate Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor to detect model performance issues and to send notifications. Incremental training is a technique that allows you to update an existing model with new data without retraining the entire model from scratch. This can save time and resources, and help the model adapt to changing data patterns. Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor is a feature that continuously monitors the quality of machine learning models in production and notifies you when there are deviations in the model quality, such as data drift and anomalies. You can set up alerts that trigger actions, such as sending notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topics, when certain conditions are met.

Option B is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Model Governance is a set of tools that help you implement ML responsibly by simplifying access control and enhancing transparency. It does not provide a mechanism to automatically adjust model hyperparameters or improve model accuracy.

Option C is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Debugger is a feature that helps you debug and optimize your model training process by capturing relevant data and providing real-time analysis. However, using Debugger alone does not update the model or monitor its performance in production. Also, retraining the model by using only data from the previous several months may not capture the full range of data variability and may introduce bias or overfitting.

Option D is incorrect because using only data from the previous several months to perform incremental training may not be sufficient to improve the model accuracy, as explained above. Moreover, this option does not specify how to activate Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor or configure the alerts and notifications.

References:

Incremental training

Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor

Amazon SageMaker Model Governance

Amazon SageMaker Debugger

Switching to an instance type that has a CPU: GPU ratio of 6:1 will reduce the training costs by using fewer CPUs and GPUs, while maintaining the same level of performance. The GPU idle time indicates that the CPU is not able to feed the GPU with enough data, so reducing the CPU: GPU ratio will balance the workload and improve the GPU utilization. A lower CPU: GPU ratio also means less overhead for inter-process communication and synchronization between the CPU and GPU processes. References:

Optimizing GPU utilization for AI/ML workloads on Amazon EC2

Analyze CPU vs. GPU Performance for AWS Machine Learning

A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a type of deep learning model that can learn to extract features from images and perform tasks such as classification, segmentation, and detection1. ResNet is a popular CNN architecture that uses residual connections to overcome the problem of vanishing gradients and enable very deep networks2. For the task of predicting product quality based on sensor data, a CNN and ResNet approach can leverage the spatial structure of the data and learn complex patterns that distinguish different quality levels.

References:

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs / ConvNets)

PyTorch ResNet: The Basics and a Quick Tutorial

Feature selection is the process of selecting a subset of extracted features that are relevant and contribute to minimizing the error rate of a trained model. Some techniques for feature selection are:

Correlation plot with heat maps: This technique visualizes the correlation between features using a color-coded matrix. Features that are highly correlated with each other or with the target variable can be identified and removed to reduce redundancy and noise.

Univariate selection: This technique evaluates each feature individually based on a statistical test, such as chi-square, ANOVA, or mutual information, and selects the features that have the highest scores or p-values. This technique is simple and fast, but it does not consider the interactions between features.

Feature importance with a tree-based classifier: This technique uses a tree-based classifier, such as random forest or gradient boosting, to rank the features based on their importance in splitting the nodes. Features that have low importance scores can be dropped from the model. This technique can capture the non-linear relationships and interactions between features.

The other options are not techniques for feature selection, but rather for feature engineering, which is the process of creating, transforming, or extracting features from the original data. Feature engineering can improve the performance and interpretability of the model, but it does not reduce the number of features.

Data scaling with standardization and normalization: This technique transforms the features to have a common scale, such as zero mean and unit variance, or a range between 0 and 1. This technique can help some algorithms, such as k-means or logistic regression, to converge faster and avoid numerical instability, but it does not change the number of features.

Data binning: This technique groups the continuous features into discrete bins or categories based on some criteria, such as equal width, equal frequency, or clustering. This technique can reduce the noise and outliers in the data, and also create ordinal or nominal features that can be used for some algorithms, such as decision trees or naive Bayes, but it does not reduce the number of features.

Data augmentation: This technique generates new data from the existing data by applying some transformations, such as rotation, flipping, cropping, or noise addition. This technique can increase the size and diversity of the data, and help prevent overfitting, but it does not reduce the number of features.

References:

Feature engineering - Machine Learning Lens

Amazon SageMaker Autopilot now provides feature selection and the ability to change data types while creating an AutoML experiment

Feature Selection in Machine Learning | Baeldung on Computer Science

Feature Selection in Machine Learning: An easy Introduction

 The XGBoost model is a supervised machine learning algorithm, which means it requires labeled data to learn from. The customers’ current segmentation is unknown, so there is no label to train the XGBoost model on. Moreover, the XGBoost model is designed for classification or regression tasks, not for clustering. Clustering is a type of unsupervised machine learning, which means it does not require labeled data. Clustering algorithms try to find natural groups or clusters in the data based on their similarity or distance. A common clustering algorithm is k-means, which partitions the data into K clusters, where each data point belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean. To meet the current requirements, the data scientist should train a k-means model with K = 5 on the same dataset to predict a segment for each customer. This way, the data scientist can identify five customer segments based on age, income, and location, without needing any labels. References:

What is XGBoost? - Amazon SageMaker

What is Clustering? - Amazon SageMaker

K-Means Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

The best solution for this scenario is to perform forecasting by using claim IDs and dates to identify the expected number of claims in each outcome category every month. This solution has the following advantages:

It leverages the historical data of claim outcomes and dates to capture the temporal patterns and trends of the claims in each category1.

It does not require the claim contents or any other features to make predictions, which simplifies the data preparation and reduces the impact of missing or incomplete data2.

It can handle the high cardinality of the outcome categories, as forecasting models can output multiple values for each time point3.

It can provide predictions for several months in advance, which is useful for planning and budgeting purposes4.

The other solutions have the following drawbacks:

A: Performing classification every month by using supervised learning of the 200 outcome categories based on claim contents is not suitable, because it assumes that the claim contents are available and complete for all the records, which is not the case in this scenario2. Moreover, classification models usually output a single label for each input, which is not adequate for predicting the number of claims in each category3. Additionally, classification models do not account for the temporal aspect of the data, which is important for forecasting1.

B: Performing reinforcement learning by using claim IDs and dates and instructing the insurance agents who submit the claim records to estimate the expected number of claims in each outcome category every month is not feasible, because it requires a feedback loop between the model and the agents, which might not be available or reliable in this scenario5. Furthermore, reinforcement learning is more suitable for sequential decision making problems, where the model learns from its actions and rewards, rather than forecasting problems, where the model learns from historical data and outputs future values6.

D: Performing classification by using supervised learning of the outcome categories for which partial information on claim contents is provided and performing forecasting by using claim IDs and dates for all other outcome categories is not optimal, because it combines two different methods that might not be consistent or compatible with each other7. Also, this solution suffers from the same limitations as solution A, such as the dependency on claim contents, the inability to handle multiple outputs, and the ignorance of temporal patterns123.

References:

1: Time Series Forecasting - Amazon SageMaker

2: Handling Missing Data for Machine Learning | AWS Machine Learning Blog

3: Forecasting vs Classification: What’s the Difference? | DataRobot

4: Amazon Forecast – Time Series Forecasting Made Easy | AWS News Blog

5: Reinforcement Learning - Amazon SageMaker

6: What is Reinforcement Learning? The Complete Guide | Edureka

7: Combining Machine Learning Models | by Will Koehrsen | Towards Data Science

Parquet is a columnar storage format that can store data in a compressed and efficient way. Parquet files can improve query performance by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned, as only the relevant columns are read from the files. Parquet files can also support predicate pushdown, which means that the filtering conditions are applied at the storage level, further reducing the data that needs to be processed. Parquet files are compatible with Amazon Athena, which can leverage the benefits of the columnar format and provide faster and cheaper queries. Therefore, the records should be stored in Parquet files in Amazon S3 to improve query performance.

References:

Columnar Storage Formats - Amazon Athena

Parquet SerDe - Amazon Athena

Optimizing Amazon Athena Queries - Amazon Athena

Parquet - Apache Software Foundation

 Amazon Forecast requires the input data to be in a specific format. The data scientist should use ETL jobs in AWS Glue to separate the dataset into a target time series dataset and an item metadata dataset. The target time series dataset should contain the timestamp, item_id, and demand columns, while the item metadata dataset should contain the item_id, category, and lead_time columns. Both datasets should be uploaded as .csv files to Amazon S3 . References:

How Amazon Forecast Works - Amazon Forecast

Choosing Datasets - Amazon Forecast

A neural network pre-trained on ImageNet is a deep learning model that has been trained on a large dataset of images containing 1000 classes of objects. The model can learn to extract high-level features from the images that capture the semantic and visual information of the objects. The penultimate layer of the model is the layer before the final output layer, and it contains a feature vector that represents the input image in a lower-dimensional space. By running images through a pre-trained neural network and collecting the feature vectors from the penultimate layer, the Specialist can obtain relevant numerical representations that can be used for nearest-neighbor searches. The feature vectors can capture the similarity between images based on the presence and appearance of similar objects, and they can be compared using distance metrics such as Euclidean distance or cosine similarity. This approach can enable the recommendation engine to show a picture that captures similar objects to a given picture.

References:

ImageNet - Wikipedia

How to use a pre-trained neural network to extract features from images | by Rishabh Anand | Analytics Vidhya | Medium

Image Similarity using Deep Ranking | by Aditya Oke | Towards Data Science

The approach that will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead is to deploy all the models to a single SageMaker endpoint, treat each model as a production variant, configure an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created, and configure the Lambda function to call each production variant and return the results of each model. This approach involves the following steps:

Deploy all the models to a single SageMaker endpoint. Amazon SageMaker is a service that can build, train, and deploy machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker can deploy multiple models to a single endpoint, which is a web service that can serve predictions from the models. Each model can be treated as a production variant, which is a version of the model that runs on one or more instances. Amazon SageMaker can distribute the traffic among the production variants according to the specified weights1.

Treat each model as a production variant. Amazon SageMaker can deploy multiple models to a single endpoint, which is a web service that can serve predictions from the models. Each model can be treated as a production variant, which is a version of the model that runs on one or more instances. Amazon SageMaker can distribute the traffic among the production variants according to the specified weights1.

Configure an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created. Amazon S3 is a service that can store and retrieve any amount of data. Amazon S3 can send event notifications when certain actions occur on the objects in a bucket, such as object creation, deletion, or modification. Amazon S3 can invoke an AWS Lambda function as a destination for the event notifications. AWS Lambda is a service that can run code without provisioning or managing servers2.

Configure the Lambda function to call each production variant and return the results of each model. AWS Lambda can execute the code that can call the SageMaker endpoint and specify the production variant to invoke. AWS Lambda can use the AWS SDK or the SageMaker Runtime API to send requests to the endpoint and receive the predictions from the models. AWS Lambda can return the results of each model as a response to the event notification3.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Configuring an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created, configuring the Lambda function to create three SageMaker batch transform jobs, one batch transform job for each model for each document, will incur more operational overhead than using a single SageMaker endpoint. Amazon SageMaker batch transform is a service that can process large datasets in batches and store the predictions in Amazon S3. Amazon SageMaker batch transform is not suitable for real-time inference, as it introduces a delay between the request and the response. Moreover, creating three batch transform jobs for each document will increase the complexity and cost of the solution4.

Option C: Deploying each model to its own SageMaker endpoint, configuring an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created, configuring the Lambda function to call each endpoint and return the results of each model, will incur more operational overhead than using a single SageMaker endpoint. Deploying each model to its own endpoint will increase the number of resources and endpoints to manage and monitor. Moreover, calling each endpoint separately will increase the latency and network traffic of the solution5.

Option D: Deploying each model to its own SageMaker endpoint, creating three AWS Lambda functions, configuring each Lambda function to call a different endpoint and return the results, configuring three S3 event notifications to invoke the Lambda functions when new documents are created, will incur more operational overhead than using a single SageMaker endpoint and a single Lambda function. Deploying each model to its own endpoint will increase the number of resources and endpoints to manage and monitor. Creating three Lambda functions will increase the complexity and cost of the solution. Configuring three S3 event notifications will increase the number of triggers and destinations to manage and monitor6.

References:

1: Deploying Multiple Models to a Single Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker

2: Configuring Amazon S3 Event Notifications - Amazon Simple Storage Service

3: Invoke an Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker

4: Get Inferences for an Entire Dataset with Batch Transform - Amazon SageMaker

5: Deploy a Model - Amazon SageMaker

6: AWS Lambda

To leverage the NVIDIA GPUs on Amazon EC2 P3 instances, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to build the Docker container to be NVIDIA-Docker compatible. NVIDIA-Docker is a tool that enables GPU-accelerated containers to run on Docker. It automatically configures the container to access the NVIDIA drivers and libraries on the host system. The Specialist does not need to bundle the NVIDIA drivers with the Docker image, as they are already installed on the EC2 P3 instances. The Specialist does not need to organize the Docker container’s file structure to execute on GPU instances, as this is not relevant for GPU compatibility. The Specialist does not need to set the GPU flag in the Amazon SageMaker Create TrainingJob request body, as this is only required for using Elastic Inference accelerators, not EC2 P3 instances. References: NVIDIA-Docker, Using GPU-Accelerated Containers, Using Elastic Inference in Amazon SageMaker

The best way to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB is to add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type. This way, Amazon Lex can resolve the synonyms to the corresponding slot values and pass them to the Lambda function. For example, if the slot type has a value “comedy” with synonyms “funny”, “fun”, and “humor”, then any of these words entered by the user will be resolved to “comedy” and the Lambda function can query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in that category. Adding synonyms to the custom slot type can be done easily using the Amazon Lex console or API, and does not require any code changes.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A: Adding the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type would not fix the problem, because the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table are not aware of these new values. The Lambda function would not be able to query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in the new categories, and the request would still fail. Moreover, adding new values to the slot type would increase the complexity and maintenance of the chatbot, as the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would have to be updated accordingly.

Option B: Creating a new custom slot type, adding the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and using this slot type for the slot would also not fix the problem, for the same reasons as option A. The Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would not be able to handle the new slot type and its values, and the request would still fail. Furthermore, creating a new slot type would require more effort and time than adding synonyms to the existing slot type.

Option C: Using the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database is not a suitable approach for this use case. The AMAZON.SearchQuery slot type is used to capture free-form user input that corresponds to a search query. However, this slot type does not perform any validation or resolution of the user input, and passes the raw input to the Lambda function. This means that the Lambda function would have to handle the logic of parsing and matching the user input to the DynamoDB table, which would require changing the Lambda code and adding more complexity to the solution.

References:

Custom slot type - Amazon Lex

Using Synonyms - Amazon Lex

Built-in Slot Types - Amazon Lex

A private subnet is a subnet that does not have a route to the internet gateway, which means that the resources in the private subnet cannot access the internet or be accessed from the internet. An S3 VPC endpoint is a gateway endpoint that allows the resources in the VPC to access the S3 service without going through the internet. By launching the notebook instances in a private subnet and accessing the data through an S3 VPC endpoint, the company can set up the job in a secure and compliant way, as the data never leaves the AWS network and is not exposed to the internet. This can also improve the performance and reliability of the data transfer, as the traffic does not depend on the internet bandwidth or availability.

References:

Amazon VPC Endpoints - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Endpoints for Amazon S3 - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Working with VPCs and Subnets - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

The solution C will improve the computational efficiency of the models because it uses Amazon SageMaker Debugger and pruning, which are techniques that can reduce the size and complexity of the convolutional neural network (CNN) models. The solution C involves the following steps:

Use Amazon SageMaker Debugger to gain visibility into the training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs. Amazon SageMaker Debugger is a service that can capture and analyze the tensors that are emitted during the training process of machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker Debugger can provide insights into the model performance, quality, and convergence. Amazon SageMaker Debugger can also help to identify and diagnose issues such as overfitting, underfitting, vanishing gradients, and exploding gradients1.

Compute the filter ranks based on the training information. Filter ranking is a technique that can measure the importance of each filter in a convolutional layer based on some criterion, such as the average percentage of zero activations or the L1-norm of the filter weights. Filter ranking can help to identify the filters that have little or no contribution to the model output, and thus can be removed without affecting the model accuracy2.

Apply pruning to remove the low-ranking filters. Pruning is a technique that can reduce the size and complexity of a neural network by removing the redundant or irrelevant parts of the network, such as neurons, connections, or filters. Pruning can help to improve the computational efficiency, memory usage, and inference speed of the model, as well as to prevent overfitting and improve generalization3.

Set the new weights based on the pruned set of filters. After pruning, the model will have a smaller and simpler architecture, with fewer filters in each convolutional layer. The new weights of the model can be set based on the pruned set of filters, either by initializing them randomly or by fine-tuning them from the original weights4.

Run a new training job with the pruned model. The pruned model can be trained again with the same or a different dataset, using the same or a different framework or algorithm. The new training job can use the same or a different configuration of Amazon SageMaker, such as the instance type, the hyperparameters, or the data ingestion mode. The new training job can also use Amazon SageMaker Debugger to monitor and analyze the training process and the model quality5.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Using Amazon CloudWatch metrics to gain visibility into the SageMaker training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs will not be as effective as using Amazon SageMaker Debugger. Amazon CloudWatch is a service that can monitor and observe the operational health and performance of AWS resources and applications. Amazon CloudWatch can provide metrics, alarms, dashboards, and logs for various AWS services, including Amazon SageMaker. However, Amazon CloudWatch does not provide the same level of granularity and detail as Amazon SageMaker Debugger for the tensors that are emitted during the training process of machine learning models. Amazon CloudWatch metrics are mainly focused on the resource utilization and the training progress, not on the model performance, quality, and convergence6.

Option B: Using Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to build and run data labeling workflows and collecting a larger labeled dataset with the labeling workflows will not improve the computational efficiency of the models. Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth is a service that can create high-quality training datasets for machine learning by using human labelers. A larger labeled dataset can help to improve the model accuracy and generalization, but it will not reduce the memory, battery, and hardware consumption of the model. Moreover, a larger labeled dataset may increase the training time and cost of the model7.

Option D: Using Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor to gain visibility into the ModelLatency metric and OverheadLatency metric of the model after the company deploys the model and increasing the model learning rate will not improve the computational efficiency of the models. Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor is a service that can monitor and analyze the quality and performance of machine learning models that are deployed on Amazon SageMaker endpoints. The ModelLatency metric and the OverheadLatency metric can measure the inference latency of the model and the endpoint, respectively. However, these metrics do not provide any information about the training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs of the model, which are needed for pruning. Moreover, increasing the model learning rate will not reduce the size and complexity of the model, but it may affect the model convergence and accuracy.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Debugger

2: Pruning Convolutional Neural Networks for Resource Efficient Inference

3: Pruning Neural Networks: A Survey

4: Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks

5: Amazon SageMaker Training Jobs

6: Amazon CloudWatch Metrics for Amazon SageMaker

7: Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth

: Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor

 Based on the figure provided, a decision tree would have the highest recall with respect to the fraudulent class. Recall is a model evaluation metric that measures the proportion of actual positive instances that are correctly classified by the model. Recall is calculated as follows:

Recall = True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives)

A decision tree is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by splitting the data into smaller and purer subsets based on a series of rules or conditions. A decision tree can handle both linear and non-linear data, and can capture complex patterns and interactions among the features. A decision tree can also be easily visualized and interpreted1

In this case, the data is not linearly separable, and has a clear pattern of seasonality. The fraudulent class forms a large circle in the center of the plot, while the normal class is scattered around the edges. A decision tree can use the transaction month and the age of account as the splitting criteria, and create a circular boundary that separates the fraudulent class from the normal class. A decision tree can achieve a high recall for the fraudulent class, as it can correctly identify most of the black dots as positive instances, and minimize the number of false negatives. A decision tree can also adjust the depth and complexity of the tree to balance the trade-off between recall and precision23

The other options are not valid or suitable for achieving a high recall for the fraudulent class. A linear support vector machine (SVM) is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by finding a linear hyperplane that maximizes the margin between the classes. A linear SVM can handle linearly separable data, but not non-linear data. A linear SVM cannot capture the circular pattern of the fraudulent class, and may misclassify many of the black dots as negative instances, resulting in a low recall4 A naive Bayesian classifier is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by applying the Bayes’ theorem and assuming conditional independence among the features. A naive Bayesian classifier can handle both linear and non-linear data, and can incorporate prior knowledge and probabilities into the model. However, a naive Bayesian classifier may not perform well when the features are correlated or dependent, as in this case. A naive Bayesian classifier may not capture the circular pattern of the fraudulent class, and may misclassify many of the black dots as negative instances, resulting in a low recall5 A single perceptron with sigmoidal activation function is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by applying a weighted linear combination of the features and a non-linear activation function. A single perceptron with sigmoidal activation function can handle linearly separable data, but not non-linear data. A single perceptron with sigmoidal activation function cannot capture the circular pattern of the fraudulent class, and may misclassify many of the black dots as negative instances, resulting in a low recall.

 The best feature engineering technique to speed up the model training time without losing a lot of information from the original dataset is to use an autoencoder or principal component analysis (PCA) to replace original features with new features. An autoencoder is a type of neural network that learns a compressed representation of the input data, called the latent space, by minimizing the reconstruction error between the input and the output. PCA is a statistical technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by finding a set of orthogonal axes, called the principal components, that capture the maximum variance of the data. Both techniques can help reduce the number of features and remove the noise and redundancy in the data, which can improve the model performance and speed up the training process. References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Dimensionality Reduction for Machine Learning

AWS Machine Learning Training - Deep Learning with Amazon SageMaker

The Machine Learning team wants to use its own training algorithm on Amazon SageMaker, and submit both its own algorithm code and algorithm-specific parameters. The best combination of services to build a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker are Amazon ECR and Amazon S3.

Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry service that allows you to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. You can use Amazon ECR to create a Docker image that contains your training algorithm code and any dependencies or libraries that it requires. You can also use Amazon ECR to push, pull, and manage your Docker images securely and reliably.

Amazon S3 is a durable, scalable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount and type of data. You can use Amazon S3 to store your training data, model artifacts, and algorithm-specific parameters. You can also use Amazon S3 to access your data and parameters from your training algorithm code, and to write your model output to a specified location.

Therefore, the Machine Learning team can use the following steps to build a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker:

Write the training algorithm code in Python, using the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK or the Amazon SageMaker Containers library to interact with the Amazon SageMaker service. The code should be able to read the input data and parameters from Amazon S3, and write the model output to Amazon S3.

Create a Dockerfile that defines the base image, the dependencies, the environment variables, and the commands to run the training algorithm code. The Dockerfile should also expose the ports that Amazon SageMaker uses to communicate with the container.

Build the Docker image using the Dockerfile, and tag it with a meaningful name and version.

Push the Docker image to Amazon ECR, and note the registry path of the image.

Upload the training data, model artifacts, and algorithm-specific parameters to Amazon S3, and note the S3 URIs of the objects.

Create an Amazon SageMaker training job, using the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK or the AWS CLI. Specify the registry path of the Docker image, the S3 URIs of the input and output data, the algorithm-specific parameters, and other configuration options, such as the instance type, the number of instances, the IAM role, and the hyperparameters.

Monitor the status and logs of the training job, and retrieve the model output from Amazon S3.

References:

Use Your Own Training Algorithms

Amazon ECR - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 - Amazon Web Services

Principal component analysis (PCA) is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that attempts to reduce the dimensionality (number of features) within a dataset while still retaining as much information as possible. This is done by finding a new set of features called components, which are composites of the original features that are uncorrelated with one another. They are also constrained so that the first component accounts for the largest possible variability in the data, the second component the second most variability, and so on. By using PCA, the impact of having a large number of features that are highly correlated with each other can be reduced, as the new feature space will have fewer dimensions and less redundancy. This can make the linear models more stable and less prone to overfitting. References:

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Perform a large-scale principal component analysis faster using Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

Machine Learning- Prinicipal Component Analysis | i2tutorials

 The business problem of predicting whether a new credit card applicant will default on a credit card payment can be framed as a binary classification problem. Binary classification is the task of predicting a discrete class label output for an example, where the class label can only take one of two possible values. In this case, the class label can be either “default” or “no default”, indicating whether the applicant will or will not default on a credit card payment. A binary classification model can return the probability that a given applicant belongs to each class, and then assign the applicant to the class with the highest probability. For example, if the model predicts that an applicant has a 0.8 probability of defaulting and a 0.2 probability of not defaulting, then the model will classify the applicant as “default”. Binary classification is suitable for this problem because the outcome of interest is categorical and binary, and the model needs to return the probability of each outcome.

References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Classification vs Regression in Machine Learning

The problem described in the question is a case of underfitting, where the neural network model performs poorly on both the training and validation sets. This means that the model has not learned the features of the data well enough and has high bias. To solve this issue, the machine learning specialist should consider the following change:

Add more data to the training set and retrain the model using transfer learning to reduce the bias: Adding more data to the training set can help the model learn more patterns and variations in the data and improve its performance. Transfer learning can also help the model leverage the knowledge from the pre-trained network and adapt it to the new data. This can reduce the bias and increase the accuracy of the model.

References:

Transfer learning for TensorFlow image classification models in Amazon SageMaker

Transfer learning for custom labels using a TensorFlow container and “bring your own algorithm” in Amazon SageMaker

Machine Learning Concepts - AWS Training and Certification

The best approach to address all of the requirements with the least development effort is to create an AWS Glue job, convert the scripts to PySpark, execute the pipeline, and store the results in Amazon S3. This is because:

AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load data for analytics 1. AWS Glue can run Python and Scala scripts to process data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Redshift, and more 2. AWS Glue also provides a serverless Apache Spark environment to run ETL jobs, eliminating the need to provision and manage servers 3.

PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, a unified analytics engine for large-scale data processing 4. PySpark can perform various data transformations and manipulations on structured and unstructured data, such as cleaning, enriching, and compressing 5. PySpark can also leverage the distributed computing power of Spark to handle terabytes of data efficiently and scalably 6.

By creating an AWS Glue job and converting the scripts to PySpark, the company can move the scripts out of Amazon EC2 into a more managed solution that will eliminate the need to maintain servers. The company can also reduce the development effort by using the AWS Glue console, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and run the job 7. Moreover, the company can use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to store and manage the metadata of the data sources and targets 8.

The other options are not as suitable as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because loading the data into an Amazon Redshift cluster and executing the pipeline by using SQL will incur additional costs and complexity for the company. Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehouse service that enables fast and scalable analysis of structured data . However, it is not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, using SQL to perform these tasks may not be as expressive and flexible as using Python scripts. Furthermore, the company will have to provision and configure the Amazon Redshift cluster, and load and unload the data from Amazon S3, which will increase the development effort and time.

Option B is not feasible because loading the data into Amazon DynamoDB and converting the scripts to an AWS Lambda function will not work for the company’s use case. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed key-value and document database service that provides fast and consistent performance at any scale . However, it is not suitable for storing and processing terabytes of data daily, as it has limits on the size and throughput of each table and item . Moreover, using AWS Lambda to execute the pipeline will not be efficient or cost-effective, as Lambda has limits on the memory, CPU, and execution time of each function . Therefore, using Amazon DynamoDB and AWS Lambda will not meet the company’s requirements for processing large amounts of data quickly and reliably.

Option D is not relevant because creating a set of individual AWS Lambda functions to execute each of the scripts and building a step function by using the AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK will not address the main issue of moving the scripts out of Amazon EC2. AWS Step Functions is a fully managed service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows . The AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK is an open source library that allows data scientists to easily create workflows that process and publish machine learning models using Amazon SageMaker and AWS Step Functions . However, these services and tools are not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, as mentioned in option B, using AWS Lambda to execute the scripts will not be efficient or cost-effective for the company’s use case.

References:

What Is AWS Glue?

AWS Glue Components

AWS Glue Serverless Spark ETL

PySpark - Overview

PySpark - RDD

PySpark - SparkContext

Adding Jobs in AWS Glue

Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog

[What Is Amazon Redshift?]

[What Is Amazon DynamoDB?]

[Service, Account, and Table Quotas in DynamoDB]

[AWS Lambda quotas]

[What Is AWS Step Functions?]

[AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK for Python]

The combination of steps that will meet the requirements are to create an IAM role in the development account that the integration account and production account can assume, attach IAM policies to the role that allow access to the feature repository and the S3 buckets, and share the feature repository that is associated with the S3 buckets from the development account to the integration account and the production account by using AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM). This approach will enable cross-account access and sharing of the features stored in Amazon SageMaker Feature Store and Amazon S3.

Amazon SageMaker Feature Store is a fully managed, purpose-built repository to store, update, search, and share curated data used in training and prediction workflows. The service provides feature management capabilities such as enabling easy feature reuse, low latency serving, time travel, and ensuring consistency between features used in training and inference workflows. A feature group is a logical grouping of ML features whose organization and structure is defined by a feature group schema. A feature group schema consists of a list of feature definitions, each of which specifies the name, type, and metadata of a feature. Amazon SageMaker Feature Store stores the features in both an online store and an offline store. The online store is a low-latency, high-throughput store that is optimized for real-time inference. The offline store is a historical store that is backed by an Amazon S3 bucket and is optimized for batch processing and model training1.

AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a web service that helps you securely control access to AWS resources for your users. You use IAM to control who can use your AWS resources (authentication) and what resources they can use and in what ways (authorization). An IAM role is an IAM identity that you can create in your account that has specific permissions. You can use an IAM role to delegate access to users, applications, or services that don’t normally have access to your AWS resources. For example, you can create an IAM role in your development account that allows the integration account and the production account to assume the role and access the resources in the development account. You can attach IAM policies to the role that specify the permissions for the feature repository and the S3 buckets. You can also use IAM conditions to restrict the access based on the source account, IP address, or other factors2.

AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM) is a service that enables you to easily and securely share AWS resources with any AWS account or within your AWS Organization. You can share AWS resources that you own with other accounts using resource shares. A resource share is an entity that defines the resources that you want to share, and the principals that you want to share with. For example, you can share the feature repository that is associated with the S3 buckets from the development account to the integration account and the production account by creating a resource share in AWS RAM. You can specify the feature group ARN and the S3 bucket ARN as the resources, and the integration account ID and the production account ID as the principals. You can also use IAM policies to further control the access to the shared resources3.

The other options are either incorrect or unnecessary. Using AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) from the integration account and the production account to retrieve credentials for the development account is not required, as the IAM role in the development account can provide temporary security credentials for the cross-account access. Setting up S3 replication between the development S3 buckets and the integration and production S3 buckets would introduce redundancy and inconsistency, as the S3 buckets are already shared through AWS RAM. Creating an AWS PrivateLink endpoint in the development account for SageMaker is not relevant, as it is used to securely connect to SageMaker services from a VPC, not from another account.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Feature Store – Amazon Web Services

2: What Is IAM? - AWS Identity and Access Management

3: What Is AWS Resource Access Manager? - AWS Resource Access Manager

 The solution A will meet the requirements with the most operational efficiency because it uses Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler, which is a service that simplifies the process of data preparation and feature engineering for machine learning. The solution A involves the following steps:

Use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler preconfigured transformations to explore feature transformations. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler provides a visual interface that allows data scientists to apply various transformations to their tabular data, such as encoding categorical features, scaling numerical features, imputing missing values, and more. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also supports custom transformations using Python code or SQL queries1.

Use SageMaker Data Wrangler templates for visualization. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also provides a set of templates that can generate visualizations of the data, such as histograms, scatter plots, box plots, and more. These visualizations can help data scientists to understand the distribution and characteristics of the data, and to compare the effects of different feature transformations1.

Export the feature processing workflow to a SageMaker pipeline for automation. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler can export the feature processing workflow as a SageMaker pipeline, which is a service that orchestrates and automates machine learning workflows. A SageMaker pipeline can run the feature processing steps as a preprocessing step, and then feed the output to a training step or an inference step. This can reduce the operational overhead of managing the feature processing workflow and ensure its consistency and reproducibility2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Using an Amazon SageMaker notebook instance to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, and packaging the feature processing steps into an AWS Lambda function for automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. The data scientist will have to write the code for the feature transformations, the data storage, the data visualization, and the Lambda function. Moreover, AWS Lambda has limitations on the execution time, memory size, and package size, which may not be sufficient for complex feature processing tasks3.

Option C: Using AWS Glue Studio with custom code to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, and packaging the feature processing steps into an AWS Lambda function for automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. AWS Glue Studio is a visual interface that allows data engineers to create and run extract, transform, and load (ETL) jobs on AWS Glue. However, AWS Glue Studio does not provide preconfigured transformations or templates for feature engineering or data visualization. The data scientist will have to write custom code for these tasks, as well as for the Lambda function. Moreover, AWS Glue Studio is not integrated with SageMaker pipelines, and it may not be optimized for machine learning workflows4.

Option D: Using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler preconfigured transformations to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, packaging each feature transformation step into a separate AWS Lambda function, and using AWS Step Functions for workflow automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. The data scientist will have to create and manage multiple AWS Lambda functions and AWS Step Functions, which can increase the complexity and cost of the solution. Moreover, AWS Lambda and AWS Step Functions may not be compatible with SageMaker pipelines, and they may not be optimized for machine learning workflows5.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

2: Amazon SageMaker Pipelines

3: AWS Lambda

4: AWS Glue Studio

5: AWS Step Functions

The algorithms that are best suited to this scenario are latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and neural topic modeling (NTM), as they are both unsupervised learning methods that can discover abstract topics from a collection of text documents. LDA and NTM can provide a list of the top words for each topic, as well as the topic distribution for each document, which can help the auditors assess the relevance and priority of the topic12.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: A random forest classifier is a supervised learning method that can perform classification or regression tasks by using an ensemble of decision trees. A random forest classifier is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and predefined classes3.

Option D: A linear support vector machine is a supervised learning method that can perform classification or regression tasks by using a linear function that separates the data into different classes. A linear support vector machine is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and predefined classes4.

Option E: A linear regression is a supervised learning method that can perform regression tasks by using a linear function that models the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. A linear regression is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and a continuous output variable5.

References:

1: Latent Dirichlet Allocation

2: Neural Topic Modeling

3: Random Forest Classifier

4: Linear Support Vector Machine

5: Linear Regression

Regularization is a technique that can be used to prevent overfitting and improve model performance on unseen data. Overfitting occurs when the model learns the training data too well and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. This can be seen in the question, where the validation accuracy is lower than the training accuracy, and both are lower than the human-level performance. Regularization is a way of adding some constraints or penalties to the model to reduce its complexity and prevent it from memorizing the training data. Some common forms of regularization for image classification are:

Weight decay: Adding a term to the loss function that penalizes large weights in the model. This can help reduce the variance and noise in the model and make it more robust to small changes in the input.

Dropout: Randomly dropping out some units or connections in the model during training. This can help reduce the co-dependency among the units and make the model more resilient to missing or corrupted features.

Data augmentation: Artificially increasing the size and diversity of the training data by applying random transformations, such as cropping, flipping, rotating, scaling, etc. This can help the model learn more invariant and generalizable features and reduce the risk of overfitting to specific patterns in the training data.

The other options are not likely to fix the issue of overfitting, and may even worsen it:

A longer training time: This can lead to more overfitting, as the model will have more chances to fit the noise and details in the training data that are not relevant for the validation data.

Making the network larger: This can increase the model capacity and complexity, which can also lead to more overfitting, as the model will have more parameters to learn and adjust to the training data.

Using a different optimizer: This can affect the speed and stability of the training process, but not necessarily the generalization ability of the model. The choice of optimizer depends on the characteristics of the data and the model, and there is no guarantee that a different optimizer will prevent overfitting.

References:

Regularization (machine learning)

Image Classification: Regularization

How to Reduce Overfitting With Dropout Regularization in Keras

The FindMatches transform is a machine learning transform that can identify and match similar records from different datasets, even when the records do not have a common unique identifier or exact field values. The FindMatches transform can also remove duplicate records from a single dataset. The FindMatches transform can be used with AWS Glue crawlers and jobs to process the data from various sources and store it in a data lake. The FindMatches transform can be created and managed using the AWS Glue console, API, or AWS Glue Studio.

The other options are not suitable for this use case because:

Option A: Using an AWS Lambda function to process the data and compare equal strings in the fields from the two datasets is not an efficient or scalable solution. It would require writing custom code and handling the data loading and cleansing logic. It would also not account for variations or inconsistencies in the field values, such as spelling errors, abbreviations, or missing data.

Option B: The AWS Glue SearchTables API operation is used to search for tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog based on a set of criteria. It is not a machine learning transform that can match records across different datasets or remove duplicates. It would also require writing custom code to invoke the API and process the results.

Option D: AWS Lake Formation does not provide a custom transform feature. It provides predefined blueprints for common data ingestion scenarios, such as database snapshot, incremental database, and log file. These blueprints do not support matching records across different datasets or removing duplicates.

The solution C will meet the requirements because it uses Amazon SageMaker Spot Instances, which are unused EC2 instances that are available at up to 90% discount compared to On-Demand prices. Amazon SageMaker Spot Instances can speed up training and lower costs by taking advantage of the spare EC2 capacity. The company does not need to make any code changes to use Spot Instances, as it can simply enable the managed spot training option in the SageMaker training job configuration. The company also does not need to implement model checkpoints, as it is using only one epoch for training, which means the model will not resume from a previous state1.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Configuring the SageMaker training job to use Pipe mode instead of File mode will not speed up training or lower costs significantly. Pipe mode is a data ingestion mode that streams data directly from S3 to the training algorithm, without copying the data to the local storage of the training instance. Pipe mode can reduce the startup time of the training job and the disk space usage, but it does not affect the computation time or the instance price. Moreover, Pipe mode may require some code changes to handle the streaming data, depending on the training algorithm2.

Option B: Configuring the SageMaker training job to use FastFile mode instead of File mode will not speed up training or lower costs significantly. FastFile mode is a data ingestion mode that copies data from S3 to the local storage of the training instance in parallel with the training process. FastFile mode can reduce the startup time of the training job and the disk space usage, but it does not affect the computation time or the instance price. Moreover, FastFile mode is only available for distributed training jobs that use multiple instances, which is not the case for the company3.

Option D: Configuring the SageMaker training job to use Spot Instances and implementing model checkpoints will not meet the requirements without the need to make any code changes. Model checkpoints are a feature that allows the training job to save the model state periodically to S3, and resume from the latest checkpoint if the training job is interrupted. Model checkpoints can help to avoid losing the training progress and ensure the model convergence, but they require some code changes to implement the checkpointing logic and the resuming logic4.

References:

1: Managed Spot Training - Amazon SageMaker

2: Pipe Mode - Amazon SageMaker

3: FastFile Mode - Amazon SageMaker

4: Checkpoints - Amazon SageMaker

 Based on the model evaluation results, this is a viable model for production because the model is 86% accurate and the cost incurred by the company as a result of false positives is less than the false negatives. The accuracy of the model is the proportion of correct predictions out of the total predictions, which can be calculated by adding the true positives and true negatives and dividing by the total number of observations. In this case, the accuracy of the model is (10 + 76) / 100 = 0.86, which means that the model correctly predicted 86% of the customers’ churn status. The cost incurred by the company as a result of false positives and false negatives is the loss or damage that the company suffers when the model makes incorrect predictions. A false positive is when the model predicts that a customer will churn, but the customer actually does not churn. A false negative is when the model predicts that a customer will not churn, but the customer actually churns. In this case, the cost of a false positive is the incentive that the company offers to the customer who is predicted to churn, which is a relatively low cost. The cost of a false negative is the revenue that the company loses when the customer churns, which is a relatively high cost. Therefore, the cost of a false positive is less than the cost of a false negative, and the company would prefer to have more false positives than false negatives. The model has 10 false positives and 4 false negatives, which means that the company’s cost is lower than if the model had more false negatives and fewer false positives.

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a fully managed service that can capture, transform, and load streaming data into AWS data stores, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon Elasticsearch Service, and Splunk. It can also invoke AWS Lambda functions to perform custom transformations on the data. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. It can also use machine learning algorithms, such as Random Cut Forest (RCF), to perform anomaly detection on streaming data. RCF is an unsupervised learning algorithm that assigns an anomaly score to each data point based on how different it is from the rest of the data. By using Kinesis Data Firehose and Kinesis Data Analytics, the cybersecurity company can ingest the data in real time, score the malicious events as anomalies, and stream the results to Amazon S3, which can serve as a data lake for later processing and analysis. This is the most efficient way to accomplish these tasks, as it does not require any additional infrastructure, coding, or training.

References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

Anomaly Detection with Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

[AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions]

Amazon Kinesis and AWS Data Pipeline are two services that can feed data to the Amazon EMR MapReduce jobs. Amazon Kinesis is a service that can ingest, process, and analyze streaming data in real time. Amazon Kinesis can be integrated with Amazon EMR to run MapReduce jobs on streaming data sources, such as web logs, social media, IoT devices, and clickstreams. Amazon Kinesis can handle data that needs to be processed in near-real time, such as for anomaly detection, fraud detection, or dashboarding. AWS Data Pipeline is a service that can orchestrate and automate data movement and transformation across various AWS services and on-premises data sources. AWS Data Pipeline can be integrated with Amazon EMR to run MapReduce jobs on batch data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon DynamoDB, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Data Pipeline can handle data that can be moved hourly, such as for data warehousing, reporting, or machine learning.

AWSDMS is not a valid service name. AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) is a service that can migrate data from various sources to various targets, but it does not support streaming data or MapReduce jobs.

Amazon Athena is a service that can query data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL, but it does not feed data to Amazon EMR or run MapReduce jobs.

Amazon ES is a service that provides a fully managed Elasticsearch cluster, which can be used for search, analytics, and visualization, but it does not feed data to Amazon EMR or run MapReduce jobs. References:

Using Amazon Kinesis with Amazon EMR - Amazon EMR

AWS Data Pipeline - Amazon Web Services

Using AWS Data Pipeline to Run Amazon EMR Jobs - AWS Data Pipeline

 Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are technologies that meet the company’s requirements for a temporary ad hoc solution for machine learning data storage and query. Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena have the following features and benefits:

Amazon S3 is a service that provides scalable, durable, and secure object storage for any type of data. Amazon S3 can store csv and JSON files, as well as other formats, and can handle large volumes of data with high availability and performance. Amazon S3 also integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon Athena, for further processing and analysis of the data.

Amazon Athena is a service that allows querying data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena can query over semi-structured data, such as JSON, as well as structured data, such as csv, without requiring any loading or transformation. Amazon Athena is serverless, meaning that there is no infrastructure to manage and users only pay for the queries they run. Amazon Athena also supports the use of AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository that can store and manage the schema and partition information of the data in Amazon S3.

Using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena, the company can achieve the following high priorities:

Solution simplicity: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are easy to use and require minimal configuration and maintenance. The company can simply upload the csv and JSON files to Amazon S3 and use Amazon Athena to query them using SQL. The company does not need to worry about provisioning, scaling, or managing any servers or clusters.

Fast development time: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena can enable the company to quickly access and analyze the data without any data preparation or loading. The company can use the existing workforce of SQL experts to write and run queries on Amazon Athena and get results in seconds or minutes.

Low cost: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are cost-effective and offer pay-as-you-go pricing models. Amazon S3 charges based on the amount of storage used and the number of requests made. Amazon Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned by the queries. The company can also reduce the costs by using compression, encryption, and partitioning techniques to optimize the data storage and query performance.

High flexibility: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are flexible and can support various data types, formats, and sources. The company can store and query any type of data in Amazon S3, such as csv, JSON, Parquet, ORC, etc. The company can also query data from multiple sources in Amazon S3, such as data lakes, data warehouses, log files, etc.

The other options are not as suitable as option A for the company’s requirements for the following reasons:

Option B: Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue are technologies that can be used for data warehousing and data integration, but they are not ideal for a temporary ad hoc solution. Amazon Redshift is a service that provides a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse that can run complex analytical queries using SQL. AWS Glue is a service that provides a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that can prepare and load data for analytics. However, using Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue would require more effort and cost than using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena. The company would need to load the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue, which can take time and incur additional charges. The company would also need to manage the capacity and performance of the Amazon Redshift cluster, which can be complex and expensive.

Option C: Amazon DynamoDB and DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) are technologies that can be used for fast and scalable NoSQL database and caching, but they are not suitable for the company’s data storage and query needs. Amazon DynamoDB is a service that provides a fully managed, key-value and document database that can deliver single-digit millisecond performance at any scale. DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) is a service that provides a fully managed, in-memory cache for DynamoDB that can improve the read performance by up to 10 times. However, using Amazon DynamoDB and DAX would not allow the company to continue to use SQL as a query language, as Amazon DynamoDB does not support SQL. The company would need to use the DynamoDB API or the AWS SDKs to access and query the data, which can require more coding and learning effort. The company would also need to transform the csv and JSON files into DynamoDB items, which can involve additional processing and complexity.

Option D: Amazon RDS and Amazon ES are technologies that can be used for relational database and search and analytics, but they are not optimal for the company’s data storage and query scenario. Amazon RDS is a service that provides a fully managed, relational database that supports various database engines, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc. Amazon ES is a service that provides a fully managed, Elasticsearch cluster, which is mainly used for search and analytics purposes. However, using Amazon RDS and Amazon ES would not be as simple and cost-effective as using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena. The company would need to load the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS, which can take time and incur additional charges. The company would also need to manage the capacity and performance of the Amazon RDS and Amazon ES clusters, which can be complex and expensive. Moreover, Amazon RDS and Amazon ES are not designed to handle semi-structured data, such as JSON, as well as Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena.

References:

Amazon S3

Amazon Athena

Amazon Redshift

AWS Glue

Amazon DynamoDB

[DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)]

[Amazon RDS]

[Amazon ES]

The best solution for this scenario is to use a multi-model endpoint in Amazon SageMaker, which allows hosting multiple models on the same endpoint and invoking them dynamically at runtime. This way, the company can reduce the operational overhead of managing multiple EC2 instances and model servers, and leverage the scalability, security, and performance of SageMaker hosting services. By using a multi-model endpoint, the company can also save on hosting costs by improving endpoint utilization and paying only for the models that are loaded in memory and the API calls that are made. To use a multi-model endpoint, the company needs to prepare a Docker container based on the open-source multi-model server, which is a framework-agnostic library that supports loading and serving multiple models from Amazon S3. The company can then create a multi-model endpoint in SageMaker, pointing to the S3 bucket containing all the models, and invoke the endpoint from the web client at runtime, specifying the TargetModel parameter according to the city of each request. This solution also enables the company to add or remove models from the S3 bucket without redeploying the endpoint, and to use different versions of the same model for different cities if needed. References:

Use Docker containers to build models

Host multiple models in one container behind one endpoint

Multi-model endpoints using Scikit Learn

Multi-model endpoints using XGBoost

Mini-batch gradient descent is a variant of gradient descent that updates the model parameters using a subset of the training data (called a mini-batch) at each iteration. The learning rate is a hyperparameter that controls how much the model parameters change in response to the gradient. If the learning rate is very high, the model parameters may overshoot the optimal values and oscillate around the minimum of the cost function. This can cause the training accuracy to fluctuate and prevent the model from converging to a stable solution. To avoid this issue, the learning rate should be chosen carefully, such as by using a learning rate decay schedule or an adaptive learning rate algorithm1. Alternatively, the batch size can be increased to reduce the variance of the gradient estimates2. However, the batch size should not be too big, as this can slow down the training process and reduce the generalization ability of the model3. Dataset shuffling and class distribution are not likely to cause oscillations in training accuracy, as they do not affect the gradient updates directly. Dataset shuffling can help avoid getting stuck in local minima and improve the convergence speed of mini-batch gradient descent4. Class distribution can affect the performance and fairness of the model, especially if the dataset is imbalanced, but it does not necessarily cause fluctuations in training accuracy.

The solution that will meet the requirements with the least amount of effort is to use a semantic segmentation algorithm to identify a visitor’s hair in video frames, and pass the identified hair to an ResNet-50 algorithm to determine hair style and hair color. This solution can leverage the existing Amazon SageMaker algorithms and frameworks to perform the tasks of hair segmentation and classification.

Semantic segmentation is a computer vision technique that assigns a class label to every pixel in an image, such that pixels with the same label share certain characteristics. Semantic segmentation can be used to identify and isolate different objects or regions in an image, such as a visitor’s hair in a video frame. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in semantic segmentation algorithm that can train and deploy models for semantic segmentation tasks. The algorithm supports three state-of-the-art network architectures: Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSP), and DeepLab v3. The algorithm can also use pre-trained or randomly initialized ResNet-50 or ResNet-101 as the backbone network. The algorithm can be trained using P2/P3 type Amazon EC2 instances in single machine configurations1.

ResNet-50 is a convolutional neural network that is 50 layers deep and can classify images into 1000 object categories. ResNet-50 is trained on more than a million images from the ImageNet database and can achieve high accuracy on various image recognition tasks. ResNet-50 can be used to determine hair style and hair color from the segmented hair regions in the video frames. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in image classification algorithm that can use ResNet-50 as the network architecture. The algorithm can also perform transfer learning by fine-tuning the pre-trained ResNet-50 model with new data. The algorithm can be trained using P2/P3 type Amazon EC2 instances in single or multiple machine configurations2.

The other options are either less effective or more complex to implement. Using an object detection algorithm to identify a visitor’s hair in video frames would not segment the hair at the pixel level, but only draw bounding boxes around the hair regions. This could result in inaccurate or incomplete hair segmentation, especially if the hair is occluded or has irregular shapes. Using an XGBoost algorithm to determine hair style and hair color would require transforming the segmented hair images into numerical features, which could lose some information or introduce noise. XGBoost is also not designed for image classification tasks, and may not achieve high accuracy or performance.

References:

1: Semantic Segmentation Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

2: Image Classification Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

To log Amazon SageMaker API calls, the team can use AWS CloudTrail, which is a service that provides a record of actions taken by a user, role, or an AWS service in SageMaker1. CloudTrail captures all API calls for SageMaker, with the exception of InvokeEndpoint and InvokeEndpointAsync, as events1. The calls captured include calls from the SageMaker console and code calls to the SageMaker API operations1. The team can create a trail to enable continuous delivery of CloudTrail events to an Amazon S3 bucket, and configure other AWS services to further analyze and act upon the event data collected in CloudTrail logs1. The auditors can view the CloudTrail log activity report in the CloudTrail console or download the log files from the S3 bucket1.

To receive a notification when the model is overfitting, the team can add code to push a custom metric to Amazon CloudWatch, which is a service that provides monitoring and observability for AWS resources and applications2. The team can use the MXNet metric API to define and compute the custom metric, such as the validation accuracy or the validation loss, and use the boto3 CloudWatch client to put the metric data to CloudWatch3 . The team can then create an alarm in CloudWatch with Amazon SNS to receive a notification when the custom metric crosses a threshold that indicates overfitting . For example, the team can set the alarm to trigger when the validation loss increases for a certain number of consecutive periods, which means the model is learning the noise in the training data and not generalizing well to the validation data.

References:

1: Log Amazon SageMaker API Calls with AWS CloudTrail - Amazon SageMaker

2: What Is Amazon CloudWatch? - Amazon CloudWatch

3: Metric API — Apache MXNet documentation

: CloudWatch — Boto 3 Docs 1.20.21 documentation

: Creating Amazon CloudWatch Alarms - Amazon CloudWatch

: What is Amazon Simple Notification Service? - Amazon Simple Notification Service

: Overfitting and Underfitting - Machine Learning Crash Course

The Data Scientist needs to migrate an existing on-premises ETL process to the cloud, using a solution that can combine multiple data sources, reuse existing PySpark logic, run on the existing schedule, and minimize the number of servers that need to be managed. The best architecture for this scenario is to use AWS Glue, which is a serverless data integration service that can create and run ETL jobs on AWS.

AWS Glue can perform the following tasks to meet the requirements:

Combine multiple data sources: AWS Glue can access data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, Amazon DynamoDB, and more. AWS Glue can also crawl the data sources and discover their schemas, formats, and partitions, and store them in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository for all the data assets.

Reuse existing PySpark logic: AWS Glue supports writing ETL scripts in Python or Scala, using Apache Spark as the underlying execution engine. AWS Glue provides a library of built-in transformations and connectors that can simplify the ETL code. The Data Scientist can write the ETL job in PySpark and leverage the existing logic to perform the data processing.

Run the solution on the existing schedule: AWS Glue can create triggers that can start ETL jobs based on a schedule, an event, or a condition. The Data Scientist can create a new AWS Glue trigger to run the ETL job based on the existing schedule, using a cron expression or a relative time interval.

Minimize the number of servers that need to be managed: AWS Glue is a serverless service, which means that it automatically provisions, configures, scales, and manages the compute resources required to run the ETL jobs. The Data Scientist does not need to worry about setting up, maintaining, or monitoring any servers or clusters for the ETL process.

Therefore, the Data Scientist should use the following architecture to build the cloud solution:

Write the raw data to Amazon S3: The Data Scientist can use any method to upload the raw data from the on-premises sources to Amazon S3, such as AWS DataSync, AWS Storage Gateway, AWS Snowball, or AWS Direct Connect. Amazon S3 is a durable, scalable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount and type of data.

Create an AWS Glue ETL job to perform the ETL processing against the input data: The Data Scientist can use the AWS Glue console, AWS Glue API, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and configure an AWS Glue ETL job. The Data Scientist can specify the input and output data sources, the IAM role, the security configuration, the job parameters, and the PySpark script location. The Data Scientist can also use the AWS Glue Studio, which is a graphical interface that can help design, run, and monitor ETL jobs visually.

Write the ETL job in PySpark to leverage the existing logic: The Data Scientist can use a code editor of their choice to write the ETL script in PySpark, using the existing logic to transform the data. The Data Scientist can also use the AWS Glue script editor, which is an integrated development environment (IDE) that can help write, debug, and test the ETL code. The Data Scientist can store the ETL script in Amazon S3 or GitHub, and reference it in the AWS Glue ETL job configuration.

Create a new AWS Glue trigger to trigger the ETL job based on the existing schedule: The Data Scientist can use the AWS Glue console, AWS Glue API, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and configure an AWS Glue trigger. The Data Scientist can specify the name, type, and schedule of the trigger, and associate it with the AWS Glue ETL job. The trigger will start the ETL job according to the defined schedule.

Configure the output target of the ETL job to write to a “processed” location in Amazon S3 that is accessible for downstream use: The Data Scientist can specify the output location of the ETL job in the PySpark script, using the AWS Glue DynamicFrame or Spark DataFrame APIs. The Data Scientist can write the output data to a “processed” location in Amazon S3, using a format such as Parquet, ORC, JSON, or CSV, that is suitable for downstream processing.

References:

What Is AWS Glue?

AWS Glue Components

AWS Glue Studio

AWS Glue Triggers

 The modeling technique that the Machine Learning Specialist should use is binary classification. Binary classification is a type of supervised learning that predicts whether an input belongs to one of two possible classes. In this case, the input is the customer’s recent usage data and the output is whether or not the customer is likely to switch to a competitor in the next 30 days. This is a binary outcome, either yes or no, so binary classification is suitable for this problem. The other options are not appropriate for this problem. Time-series prediction is a type of supervised learning that forecasts future values based on past and present data. Anomaly detection is a type of unsupervised learning that identifies outliers or abnormal patterns in the data. Regression is a type of supervised learning that estimates a continuous numerical value based on the input features. References: Binary Classification, Time Series Prediction, Anomaly Detection, Regression

The solution that the agency should consider is to use a proxy server at each local office and for each camera, and stream the RTSP feed to a unique Amazon Kinesis Video Streams video stream. On each stream, use Amazon Rekognition Video and create a stream processor to detect faces from a collection of known employees, and alert when non-employees are detected.

This solution has the following advantages:

It can handle thousands of video cameras in real time, as Amazon Kinesis Video Streams can scale elastically to support any number of producers and consumers1.

It can leverage the Amazon Rekognition Video API, which is designed and optimized for video analysis, and can detect faces in challenging conditions such as low lighting, occlusions, and different poses2.

It can use a stream processor, which is a feature of Amazon Rekognition Video that allows you to create a persistent application that analyzes streaming video and stores the results in a Kinesis data stream3. The stream processor can compare the detected faces with a collection of known employees, which is a container for persisting faces that you want to search for in the input video stream4. The stream processor can also send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) when non-employees are detected, which can trigger downstream actions such as sending alerts or storing the events in Amazon Elasticsearch Service (Amazon ES)3.

References:

1: What Is Amazon Kinesis Video Streams? - Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

2: Detecting and Analyzing Faces - Amazon Rekognition

3: Using Amazon Rekognition Video Stream Processor - Amazon Rekognition

4: Working with Stored Faces - Amazon Rekognition

Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) is a metric that is best suited to score the model for the given scenario. AUC is a measure of the performance of a binary classifier, such as a model that predicts whether a credit card transaction is valid or fraudulent. AUC is calculated based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which is a plot that shows the trade-off between the true positive rate (TPR) and the false positive rate (FPR) of the classifier as the decision threshold is varied. The TPR, also known as recall or sensitivity, is the proportion of actual positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are correctly predicted as positive by the classifier. The FPR, also known as the fall-out, is the proportion of actual negative cases (valid transactions) that are incorrectly predicted as positive by the classifier. The ROC curve illustrates how well the classifier can distinguish between the two classes, regardless of the class distribution or the error costs. A perfect classifier would have a TPR of 1 and an FPR of 0 for all thresholds, resulting in a ROC curve that goes from the bottom left to the top left and then to the top right of the plot. A random classifier would have a TPR and an FPR that are equal for all thresholds, resulting in a ROC curve that goes from the bottom left to the top right of the plot along the diagonal line. AUC is the area under the ROC curve, and it ranges from 0 to 1. A higher AUC indicates a better classifier, as it means that the classifier has a higher TPR and a lower FPR for all thresholds. AUC is a useful metric for imbalanced classification problems, such as the credit card transaction dataset, because it is insensitive to the class imbalance and the error costs. AUC can capture the overall performance of the classifier across all possible scenarios, and it can be used to compare different classifiers based on their ROC curves.

The other options are not as suitable as AUC for the given scenario for the following reasons:

Precision: Precision is the proportion of predicted positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are actually positive. Precision is a useful metric when the cost of a false positive is high, such as in spam detection or medical diagnosis. However, precision is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it can be misleadingly high when the positive class is rare. For example, a classifier that predicts all transactions as valid would have a precision of 0, but a very high accuracy of 99%. Precision is also dependent on the decision threshold and the error costs, which may vary for different scenarios.

Recall: Recall is the same as the TPR, and it is the proportion of actual positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are correctly predicted as positive by the classifier. Recall is a useful metric when the cost of a false negative is high, such as in fraud detection or cancer diagnosis. However, recall is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it can be misleadingly low when the positive class is rare. For example, a classifier that predicts all transactions as fraudulent would have a recall of 1, but a very low accuracy of 1%. Recall is also dependent on the decision threshold and the error costs, which may vary for different scenarios.

Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): RMSE is a metric that measures the average difference between the predicted and the actual values. RMSE is a useful metric for regression problems, where the goal is to predict a continuous value, such as the price of a house or the temperature of a city. However, RMSE is not a good metric for classification problems, where the goal is to predict a discrete value, such as the class label of a transaction. RMSE is not meaningful for classification problems, because it does not capture the accuracy or the error costs of the predictions.

References:

ROC Curve and AUC

How and When to Use ROC Curves and Precision-Recall Curves for Classification in Python

Precision-Recall

Root Mean Squared Error

The solution C is the most likely to improve the data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 because it increases the number of shards for the data stream. The number of shards determines the throughput capacity of the data stream, which affects the rate of data ingestion. Each shard can support up to 1 MB per second of data input and 2 MB per second of data output. By increasing the number of shards, the company can increase the data ingestion rate proportionally. The company can use the UpdateShardCount API operation to modify the number of shards in the data stream1.

The other options are not likely to improve the data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 because:

Option A: Increasing the number of S3 prefixes for the delivery stream to write to will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the way the data is organized in the S3 bucket. The number of S3 prefixes can help to optimize the performance of downstream applications that read the data from S3, but it does not impact the performance of Kinesis Data Firehose2.

Option B: Decreasing the retention period for the data stream will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the amount of time the data is stored in the data stream. The retention period can help to manage the data availability and durability, but it does not impact the throughput capacity of the data stream3.

Option D: Adding more consumers using the Kinesis Client Library (KCL) will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the way the data is processed by downstream applications. The consumers can help to scale the data processing and handle failures, but they do not impact the data ingestion into S3 by Kinesis Data Firehose4.

References:

1: Resharding - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

2: Amazon S3 Prefixes - Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

3: Data Retention - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

4: Developing Consumers Using the Kinesis Client Library - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

 The best solution to reduce the cost of the notebook instance and the data preprocessing job is to change the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance, stop the notebook when it is not in use, and run data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing. This solution will result in the most cost savings because:

Changing the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance will reduce the hourly cost of running the notebook, since the feature engineering development does not require high CPU and memory resources. For example, an ml.t3.medium instance costs $0.0464 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance costs $0.888 per hour1.

Stopping the notebook when it is not in use will also reduce the cost, since the notebook will only incur charges when it is running. For example, if the notebook is used for 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, then stopping it when it is not in use will save about 76% of the monthly cost compared to leaving it running all the time2.

Running data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the ml.r5 instance is optimized for memory-intensive workloads and has a lower cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 instance. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 128 GB of memory and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Therefore, the ml.r5.4xlarge instance can process the same amount of data in half the time and at a lower cost than the ml.m5.4xlarge instance. Moreover, using Amazon SageMaker Processing will allow the data preprocessing job to run on a separate, fully managed infrastructure that can be scaled up or down as needed, without affecting the notebook instance.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because changing the notebook instance type to a memory optimized instance with the same vCPU number as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance has will not reduce the cost of the notebook, since the memory optimized instances have a higher cost per vCPU than the general-purpose instances. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, running both data preprocessing and feature engineering development on the same instance will not take advantage of the scalability and flexibility of Amazon SageMaker Processing.

Option B is not suitable because running data preprocessing on a P3 instance type with the same memory as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the P3 instance type is optimized for GPU-based workloads and has a higher cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 or ml.r5 instance types. For example, an ml.p3.2xlarge instance has 61 GB of memory and costs $3.06 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, the data preprocessing job does not require GPU, so using a P3 instance type will be wasteful and inefficient.

Option D is not feasible because running data preprocessing on an R5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using the Reserved Instance option will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the Reserved Instance option requires a commitment to a consistent amount of usage for a period of 1 or 3 years3. However, the data preprocessing job only runs once a day on average and completes in only 2 hours, so it does not have a consistent or predictable usage pattern. Therefore, using the Reserved Instance option will not provide any cost savings and may incur additional charges for unused capacity.

References:

Amazon SageMaker Pricing

Manage Notebook Instances - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon EC2 Pricing - Reserved Instances

For a repository containing a large and dynamically scaling collection of images, Amazon S3 is ideal due to its scalability and versioning capabilities. Amazon S3 natively supports automatic scaling to accommodate increasing storage needs and allows versioning, which enables tracking and managing different versions of objects.

To meet the requirement of maintaining multiple, immediately accessible copies of data across AWS Regions, S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) can be enabled. CRR automatically replicates new or updated objects to a specified destination bucket in another AWS Region, ensuring low-latency access and disaster recovery. By setting up CRR with versioning enabled, the data scientist can achieve a multi-Region, scalable, and version-controlled repository in Amazon S3.

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can ingest streaming data and store it in various destinations, including Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon Elasticsearch Service, and Splunk. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can also convert the incoming data to Apache Parquet or Apache ORC format before storing it in Amazon S3. This can reduce the storage cost and improve the performance of analytical queries on the data. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose supports various data sources, such as Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka, AWS IoT, and custom applications. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can also apply data transformation and compression using AWS Lambda functions.

AWSDMS is not a valid service name. AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) is a service that can migrate data from various sources to various targets, but it does not support streaming data or Parquet format.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a service that can ingest and process streaming data in real time, but it does not store the data in any destination. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams can be integrated with Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to store the data in Parquet format.

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data using SQL or Apache Flink, but it does not store the data in any destination. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics can be integrated with Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to store the data in Parquet format. References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose? - Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose FAQs - Amazon Web Services

To fix the incorrectly skewed data, the Data Scientist can apply two feature transformations: numerical value binning and logarithmic transformation. Numerical value binning is a technique that groups continuous values into discrete bins or categories. This can help reduce the skewness of the data by creating more balanced frequency distributions. Logarithmic transformation is a technique that applies the natural logarithm function to each value in the data. This can help reduce the right skewness of the data by compressing the large values and expanding the small values. Both of these transformations can make the data more suitable for machine learning algorithms that assume normality of the data. References:

Data Transformation - Amazon SageMaker

Transforming Skewed Data for Machine Learning

The best solution for encrypting images at rest and in transit, and opting out of data usage for service improvement, is to use the following steps:

Enable server-side encryption on the S3 bucket. This will encrypt the images stored in the bucket using AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer master keys (CMKs). This will protect the data at rest from unauthorized access1

Submit an AWS Support ticket to opt out of allowing images to be used for improving the service, and follow the process provided by AWS Support. This will prevent AWS from storing or using the images processed by Amazon Rekognition for service development or enhancement purposes. This will protect the data privacy and ownership2

Use HTTPS to call the Amazon Rekognition CompareFaces API operation. This will encrypt the data in transit between the client and the server using SSL/TLS protocols. This will protect the data from interception or tampering3

The other options are incorrect because they either do not encrypt the images at rest or in transit, or do not opt out of data usage for service improvement. For example:

Option B switches to using an Amazon Rekognition collection to store the images. A collection is a container for storing face vectors that are calculated by Amazon Rekognition. It does not encrypt the images at rest or in transit, and it does not opt out of data usage for service improvement. It also requires changing the API operations from CompareFaces to IndexFaces and SearchFacesByImage, which may not have the same functionality or performance4

Option C switches to using the AWS GovCloud (US) Region for Amazon S3 and Amazon Rekognition. The AWS GovCloud (US) Region is an isolated AWS Region designed to host sensitive data and regulated workloads in the cloud. It does not automatically encrypt the images at rest or in transit, and it does not opt out of data usage for service improvement. It also requires migrating the data and the application to a different Region, which may incur additional costs and complexity5

Option D enables client-side encryption on the S3 bucket. This means that the client is responsible for encrypting and decrypting the images before uploading or downloading them from the bucket. This adds extra overhead and complexity to the client application, and it does not encrypt the data in transit when calling the Amazon Rekognition API. It also does not opt out of data usage for service improvement.

References:

1: Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with AWS KMS–Managed Keys (SSE-KMS) - Amazon Simple Storage Service

2: Opting Out of Content Storage and Use for Service Improvements - Amazon Rekognition

3: HTTPS - Wikipedia

4: Working with Stored Faces - Amazon Rekognition

5: AWS GovCloud (US) - Amazon Web Services

: Protecting Data Using Client-Side Encryption - Amazon Simple Storage Service

The solution that will meet the requirements with the least development effort is to use Amazon SageMaker Feature Store to set feature groups for the current features that the ML models use, assign the required metadata for each feature, and use Amazon QuickSight to analyze the metadata. This solution can leverage the existing AWS services and features to perform feature-level metadata analysis and reporting.

Amazon SageMaker Feature Store is a fully managed, purpose-built repository to store, update, search, and share machine learning (ML) features. The service provides feature management capabilities such as enabling easy feature reuse, low latency serving, time travel, and ensuring consistency between features used in training and inference workflows. A feature group is a logical grouping of ML features whose organization and structure is defined by a feature group schema. A feature group schema consists of a list of feature definitions, each of which specifies the name, type, and metadata of a feature. The metadata can include information such as data sensitivity, authorship, description, and parameters. The metadata can help make features discoverable, understandable, and traceable. Amazon SageMaker Feature Store allows users to set feature groups for the current features that the ML models use, and assign the required metadata for each feature using the AWS SDK for Python (Boto3), AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI), or Amazon SageMaker Studio1.

Amazon QuickSight is a fully managed, serverless business intelligence service that makes it easy to create and publish interactive dashboards that include ML insights. Amazon QuickSight can connect to various data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon SageMaker Feature Store, and analyze the data using standard SQL or built-in ML-powered analytics. Amazon QuickSight can also create rich visualizations and reports that can be accessed from any device, and securely shared with anyone inside or outside an organization. Amazon QuickSight can be used to analyze the metadata of the features stored in Amazon SageMaker Feature Store, and generate a report that summarizes the metadata analysis2.

The other options are either more complex or less effective than the proposed solution. Using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler to select the features and create a data flow to perform feature-level metadata analysis would require additional steps and resources, and may not capture all the metadata attributes that the company requires. Creating an Amazon DynamoDB table to store feature-level metadata would introduce redundancy and inconsistency, as the metadata is already stored in Amazon SageMaker Feature Store. Using SageMaker Studio to analyze the metadata would not generate a report that can be easily shared and accessed by the company.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Feature Store – Amazon Web Services

2: Amazon QuickSight – Business Intelligence Service - Amazon Web Services

The best solution to verify the suitability of an ARIMA approach is to use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Seasonal-Trend decomposition, which can be used to decompose a time series into its trend, seasonal, and residual components. This analysis can help the developer understand the patterns and characteristics of the time series, such as stationarity, seasonality, and autocorrelation, which are important for choosing an appropriate ARIMA model. Data Wrangler also provides built-in transformations that can help the developer handle missing data, such as imputing with mean, median, mode, or constant values, or dropping rows with missing values. Imputing missing data can help avoid gaps and irregularities in the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model performance. Data Wrangler also allows the developer to export the prepared data and the analysis code to various destinations, such as SageMaker Processing, SageMaker Pipelines, or SageMaker Feature Store, for further processing and modeling.

The other options are not suitable for verifying the suitability of an ARIMA approach. Amazon SageMaker Autopilot is a feature-set that automates key tasks of an automatic machine learning (AutoML) process. It explores the data, selects the algorithms relevant to the problem type, and prepares the data to facilitate model training and tuning. However, Autopilot does not support ARIMA as a machine learning problem type, and it does not provide any visualization or analysis of the time series data. Resampling data by using the aggregate daily total can reduce the granularity and resolution of the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model accuracy and applicability.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Transform and Export

•Amazon SageMaker Autopilot

•ARIMA Model – Complete Guide to Time Series Forecasting in Python

 Transfer learning is a technique that allows us to use a model trained for a certain task as a starting point for a machine learning model for a different task. For image classification, a common practice is to use a pre-trained model that was trained on a large and general dataset, such as ImageNet, and then customize it for the specific task. One way to customize the model is to replace the last fully connected layer, which is responsible for the final classification, with a new layer that has the same number of units as the number of classes in the new task. This way, the model can leverage the features learned by the previous layers, which are generic and useful for many image recognition tasks, and learn to map them to the new classes. The new layer can be initialized with random weights, and the rest of the model can be initialized with the pre-trained weights. This method is also known as feature extraction, as it extracts meaningful features from the pre-trained model and uses them for the new task. References:

Transfer learning and fine-tuning

Deep transfer learning for image classification: a survey

The best option is to use AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) with table mapping to select PostgreSQL tables with no sensitive data through an SSL connection. Replicate data directly into Amazon S3. This option meets the following requirements:

It ensures that only nonsensitive data is transferred to the cloud by using table mapping to filter out the tables that contain sensitive data1.

It uses IPsec to secure the data transfer by enabling SSL encryption for the AWS DMS endpoint2.

It uploads the data to Amazon S3 each day for model retraining by using the ongoing replication feature of AWS DMS3.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as the option above. Creating an AWS Glue job to connect to the PostgreSQL DB instance and ingest data through an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection directly into Amazon S3 is possible, but it requires more steps and resources than using AWS DMS. Also, it does not specify how to filter out the sensitive data from the tables. Creating an AWS Glue job to connect to the PostgreSQL DB instance and ingest all data through an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection into Amazon S3 while removing sensitive data using a PySpark job is also possible, but it is more complex and error-prone than using AWS DMS. Also, it does not use IPsec as required. Using PostgreSQL logical replication to replicate all data to PostgreSQL in Amazon EC2 through AWS Direct Connect with a VPN connection, and then using AWS Glue to move data from Amazon EC2 to Amazon S3 is not feasible, because PostgreSQL logical replication does not support replicating only a subset of data4. Also, it involves unnecessary data movement and additional costs.

References:

Table mapping - AWS Database Migration Service

Using SSL to encrypt a connection to a DB instance - AWS Database Migration Service

Ongoing replication - AWS Database Migration Service

Logical replication - PostgreSQL

The Data Scientist should increase the XGBoost scale_pos_weight parameter to adjust the balance of positive and negative weights and change the XGBoost eval_metric parameter to optimize based on Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). This will help reduce the number of false negative predictions by the model.

The scale_pos_weight parameter controls the balance of positive and negative weights in the XGBoost algorithm. It is useful for imbalanced classification problems, such as fraud detection, where the number of positive examples (fraudulent transactions) is much smaller than the number of negative examples (non-fraudulent transactions). By increasing the scale_pos_weight parameter, the Data Scientist can assign more weight to the positive class and make the model more sensitive to detecting fraudulent transactions.

The eval_metric parameter specifies the metric that is used to measure the performance of the model during training and validation. The default metric for binary classification problems is the error rate, which is the fraction of incorrect predictions. However, the error rate is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it does not take into account the cost of different types of errors. For example, in fraud detection, a false negative (failing to detect a fraudulent transaction) is more costly than a false positive (flagging a non-fraudulent transaction as fraudulent). Therefore, the Data Scientist should use a metric that reflects the trade-off between the true positive rate (TPR) and the false positive rate (FPR), such as the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). The AUC is a measure of how well the model can distinguish between the positive and negative classes, regardless of the classification threshold. A higher AUC means that the model can achieve a higher TPR with a lower FPR, which is desirable for fraud detection.

References:

XGBoost Parameters - Amazon Machine Learning

Using XGBoost with Amazon SageMaker - AWS Machine Learning Blog

 The issue is that the notebook instances’ security group allows inbound traffic from any source IP address, which means that anyone with the authorized URL can access the notebook instances over the internet. To fix this issue, the data science team should modify the security group to allow traffic only from the CIDR ranges of the VPC, which are the IP addresses assigned to the resources within the VPC. This way, only the VPC interface endpoints and the resources within the VPC can communicate with the notebook instances. The data science team should apply this security group to all of the notebook instances’ VPC interfaces, which are the network interfaces that connect the notebook instances to the VPC.

The other options are not correct because:

Option B: Creating an IAM policy that allows the sagemaker:CreatePresignedNotebookInstanceUrl and sagemaker:DescribeNotebookInstance actions from only the VPC endpoints does not prevent individuals outside the VPC from accessing the notebook instances. These actions are used to generate and retrieve the authorized URL for the notebook instances, but they do not control who can use the URL to access the notebook instances. The URL can still be shared or leaked to unauthorized users, who can then access the notebook instances over the internet.

Option C: Adding a NAT gateway to the VPC and converting the subnets where the notebook instances are hosted to private subnets does not solve the issue either. A NAT gateway is used to enable outbound internet access from a private subnet, but it does not affect inbound internet access. The notebook instances can still be accessed over the internet if their security group allows inbound traffic from any source IP address. Moreover, stopping and starting the notebook instances to reassign only private IP addresses is not necessary, because the notebook instances already have private IP addresses assigned by the VPC interface endpoints.

Option D: Changing the network ACL of the subnet the notebook is hosted in to restrict access to anyone outside the VPC is not a good practice, because network ACLs are stateless and apply to the entire subnet. This means that the data science team would have to specify both the inbound and outbound rules for each IP address range that they want to allow or deny. This can be cumbersome and error-prone, especially if the VPC has multiple subnets and resources. It is better to use security groups, which are stateful and apply to individual resources, to control the access to the notebook instances.

References:

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Security Groups for Your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

VPC Interface Endpoints - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Normalization is a data preprocessing technique that can be used to scale the input features to a common range, such as [-1, 1] or [0, 1]. Normalization can help reduce the effect of outliers, improve the convergence of gradient-based algorithms, and prevent variables with a larger magnitude from dominating the model. One common method of normalization is standardization, which transforms each feature to have a mean of 0 and a variance of 1. This can be done by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation of each feature. Standardization can be useful for models that assume the input features are normally distributed, such as linear regression, logistic regression, and support vector machines. References:

Data normalization and standardization: A video that explains the concept and benefits of data normalization and standardization.

Standardize or Normalize?: A blog post that compares different methods of scaling the input features.

A naive Bayesian model assumes that the features are conditionally independent given the class label. This means that the joint probability of the features and the class can be factorized as the product of the class prior and the feature likelihoods. A full Bayesian network, on the other hand, does not make this assumption and allows for modeling arbitrary dependencies between the features and the class using a directed acyclic graph. In this case, the joint probability of the features and the class is given by the product of the conditional probabilities of each node given its parents in the graph. If the features are statistically dependent, meaning that their correlation coefficients are not close to zero, then a naive Bayesian model would not capture these dependencies and would likely perform worse than a full Bayesian network that can account for them. Therefore, a full Bayesian network describes the underlying data better in this situation. References:

Naive Bayes and Text Classification I

Bayesian Networks

Clustering is a machine learning technique that can group data points into clusters based on their similarity or proximity. Clustering can help discover the underlying structure and patterns in the data, as well as identify outliers or anomalies. Clustering can also be used for customer segmentation, which is the process of dividing customers into groups based on their characteristics, behaviors, preferences, or needs. Customer segmentation can help understand the key features and needs of different customer segments, as well as design and implement targeted marketing campaigns for each segment. In this case, the Marketing Manager at a pet insurance company plans to launch a targeted marketing campaign on social media to acquire new customers. To do this, the Manager can use clustering on customer profile data to understand the key characteristics of consumer segments, such as their demographics, pet types, policy preferences, premiums paid, claims made, etc. The Manager can then find similar profiles on social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc., by using the cluster features as filters or keywords. The Manager can then target these potential new customers with personalized and relevant ads or offers that match their segment’s needs and interests. This way, the Manager can implement a machine learning model to identify potential new customers on social media.